谁对谁做了什么,我们已经知道了什么?

IF 1.8 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism Pub Date : 2021-08-20 DOI:10.1075/lab.20045.ion
T. Ionin, M. Goldshtein, T. Luchkina, Sofya Styrina
{"title":"谁对谁做了什么,我们已经知道了什么?","authors":"T. Ionin, M. Goldshtein, T. Luchkina, Sofya Styrina","doi":"10.1075/lab.20045.ion","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper reports on an experimental investigation of what second language (L2) learners and heritage speakers of\n Russian know about the relationship between word order and information structure in Russian. The participants completed a bimodal\n acceptability judgment task, rating the acceptability of SVO and OVS word orders in narrow-focus contexts, under neutral prosody.\n Heritage speakers behaved like the control group of baseline speakers, preferring SVO order in answer to object questions, and OVS\n order in answer to subject questions. In contrast, L2 learners preferred SVO order regardless of the context. While the heritage\n speaker group was more proficient than the L2 group, proficiency alone cannot account for differences in performance:\n specifically, with regard to acceptance of OVS order for subject narrow focus, heritage speakers improved with proficiency, but L2\n learners did not. It is proposed that heritage speakers have an advantage in this domain due to early age of acquisition (cf.\n Montrul, 2008). This finding is consistent with prior literature on narrow focus\n with heritage speakers of other languages, and suggests that this phenomenon is not particularly vulnerable in heritage\n languages.","PeriodicalId":48664,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who did what to whom, and what did we already know?\",\"authors\":\"T. Ionin, M. Goldshtein, T. Luchkina, Sofya Styrina\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/lab.20045.ion\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper reports on an experimental investigation of what second language (L2) learners and heritage speakers of\\n Russian know about the relationship between word order and information structure in Russian. The participants completed a bimodal\\n acceptability judgment task, rating the acceptability of SVO and OVS word orders in narrow-focus contexts, under neutral prosody.\\n Heritage speakers behaved like the control group of baseline speakers, preferring SVO order in answer to object questions, and OVS\\n order in answer to subject questions. In contrast, L2 learners preferred SVO order regardless of the context. While the heritage\\n speaker group was more proficient than the L2 group, proficiency alone cannot account for differences in performance:\\n specifically, with regard to acceptance of OVS order for subject narrow focus, heritage speakers improved with proficiency, but L2\\n learners did not. It is proposed that heritage speakers have an advantage in this domain due to early age of acquisition (cf.\\n Montrul, 2008). This finding is consistent with prior literature on narrow focus\\n with heritage speakers of other languages, and suggests that this phenomenon is not particularly vulnerable in heritage\\n languages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.20045.ion\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.20045.ion","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文对第二语言学习者和俄语传统使用者对俄语语序与信息结构之间关系的了解进行了实验研究。参与者完成了一项双峰可接受性判断任务,在中性韵律下,对窄焦点上下文中SVO和OVS语序的可接受性进行评级。传统说话者的行为与基线说话者的对照组相似,在回答对象问题时更倾向于SVO顺序,在回答主题问题时则倾向于OVS顺序。相比之下,二语学习者更喜欢SVO顺序,而不考虑上下文。虽然传统说话者组比第二语言组更熟练,但仅凭熟练程度并不能解释成绩的差异:特别是,在接受OVS顺序进行主题狭窄聚焦方面,传统说话者的熟练程度有所提高,但第二语言学习者没有。有人提出,由于获得遗产的年龄较早,讲遗产的人在这一领域具有优势(参见Montrul,2008)。这一发现与先前文献中对其他语言的传统使用者的狭隘关注一致,并表明这种现象在传统语言中并不特别容易受到影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Who did what to whom, and what did we already know?
This paper reports on an experimental investigation of what second language (L2) learners and heritage speakers of Russian know about the relationship between word order and information structure in Russian. The participants completed a bimodal acceptability judgment task, rating the acceptability of SVO and OVS word orders in narrow-focus contexts, under neutral prosody. Heritage speakers behaved like the control group of baseline speakers, preferring SVO order in answer to object questions, and OVS order in answer to subject questions. In contrast, L2 learners preferred SVO order regardless of the context. While the heritage speaker group was more proficient than the L2 group, proficiency alone cannot account for differences in performance: specifically, with regard to acceptance of OVS order for subject narrow focus, heritage speakers improved with proficiency, but L2 learners did not. It is proposed that heritage speakers have an advantage in this domain due to early age of acquisition (cf. Montrul, 2008). This finding is consistent with prior literature on narrow focus with heritage speakers of other languages, and suggests that this phenomenon is not particularly vulnerable in heritage languages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism
Linguistic Approaches To Bilingualism Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: LAB provides an outlet for cutting-edge, contemporary studies on bilingualism. LAB assumes a broad definition of bilingualism, including: adult L2 acquisition, simultaneous child bilingualism, child L2 acquisition, adult heritage speaker competence, L1 attrition in L2/Ln environments, and adult L3/Ln acquisition. LAB solicits high quality articles of original research assuming any cognitive science approach to understanding the mental representation of bilingual language competence and performance, including cognitive linguistics, emergentism/connectionism, generative theories, psycholinguistic and processing accounts, and covering typical and atypical populations.
期刊最新文献
Heritage speaker pragmatics Prediction during spoken language processing in monolingual and multilingual children The acquisition of consonant clusters and word stress by early second language learners of German Reviewers for Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism in 2022 and 2023 Inter-generational attrition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1