“我对社区的定义是社区,他们的定义更多地围绕着球迷参与”:平衡职业运动队社区活动的商业和社会逻辑

IF 3.7 1区 教育学 Q1 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM Sport Management Review Pub Date : 2022-09-08 DOI:10.1080/14413523.2022.2087966
Jonathan Robertson, A. Karg, Katie Rowe, Katherine Raw
{"title":"“我对社区的定义是社区,他们的定义更多地围绕着球迷参与”:平衡职业运动队社区活动的商业和社会逻辑","authors":"Jonathan Robertson, A. Karg, Katie Rowe, Katherine Raw","doi":"10.1080/14413523.2022.2087966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Professional sport teams operate within an increasingly complex institutional environment and are required to often confront incompatible prescriptions from multiple institutional logics, such as performance and commercial goals (i.e., business logics) relative to community development and altruistic goals (i.e., social logics). The aim of this research is to investigate the influence of institutional complexity on managers perceptions of community-oriented practices across 12 professional teams within a single Australian sport league. Using Raynard’s (2016) configurations of institutional complexity, we identify two types of hybrid responses that professional teams utilise to address multiple logics: aligned and segregated. When community managers perceived social logics to be aligned with business logics, community activities were more aligned with commercial organisational outcomes such as brand, fan and sponsorship benefits. Alternatively, when managers perceived social logics to be segregated from business logics, community activities were more autonomous from commercial drivers, allowing a greater focus on community development outcomes including education, health and increased trust. Theoretically, our research adds to institutional logic scholarship by showing that multiple logics can be compatible with each other, central logics influence peripheral logics and organisational responses to institutional complexity can vary within a professional sport league. HIGHLIGHTS Professional sport teams are operating in increasingly complex institutional environments. Organisations responded to institutional complexity by either segregating community activities from, or aligning community activities with commercial goals. Community activities that were directed by business logics focused upon commercial outcomes, such as fans, sponsorships, and branding. Community activities that focused upon social logics targeted community outcomes, such as health, education, engagement, and trust.","PeriodicalId":48057,"journal":{"name":"Sport Management Review","volume":"26 1","pages":"405 - 425"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“My definition of community is community, and their definition is more around fan engagement”: balancing business and social logics of professional sport teams’ community activities\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Robertson, A. Karg, Katie Rowe, Katherine Raw\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14413523.2022.2087966\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Professional sport teams operate within an increasingly complex institutional environment and are required to often confront incompatible prescriptions from multiple institutional logics, such as performance and commercial goals (i.e., business logics) relative to community development and altruistic goals (i.e., social logics). The aim of this research is to investigate the influence of institutional complexity on managers perceptions of community-oriented practices across 12 professional teams within a single Australian sport league. Using Raynard’s (2016) configurations of institutional complexity, we identify two types of hybrid responses that professional teams utilise to address multiple logics: aligned and segregated. When community managers perceived social logics to be aligned with business logics, community activities were more aligned with commercial organisational outcomes such as brand, fan and sponsorship benefits. Alternatively, when managers perceived social logics to be segregated from business logics, community activities were more autonomous from commercial drivers, allowing a greater focus on community development outcomes including education, health and increased trust. Theoretically, our research adds to institutional logic scholarship by showing that multiple logics can be compatible with each other, central logics influence peripheral logics and organisational responses to institutional complexity can vary within a professional sport league. HIGHLIGHTS Professional sport teams are operating in increasingly complex institutional environments. Organisations responded to institutional complexity by either segregating community activities from, or aligning community activities with commercial goals. Community activities that were directed by business logics focused upon commercial outcomes, such as fans, sponsorships, and branding. Community activities that focused upon social logics targeted community outcomes, such as health, education, engagement, and trust.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sport Management Review\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"405 - 425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sport Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2022.2087966\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sport Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14413523.2022.2087966","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要职业运动队在日益复杂的制度环境中运作,往往需要面对多个制度逻辑的不相容处方,如绩效和商业目标(即商业逻辑)相对于社区发展和利他主义目标(即社会逻辑)。本研究的目的是调查制度复杂性对澳大利亚体育联盟内12支职业球队管理者对社区导向实践的看法的影响。使用Raynard(2016)对制度复杂性的配置,我们确定了专业团队用来解决多种逻辑的两种类型的混合反应:一致和分离。当社区管理者认为社会逻辑与商业逻辑一致时,社区活动与商业组织结果(如品牌、粉丝和赞助利益)更为一致。或者,当管理者认为社会逻辑与商业逻辑分离时,社区活动更独立于商业驱动因素,从而更加关注社区发展成果,包括教育、健康和增加信任。从理论上讲,我们的研究增加了制度逻辑的学术性,表明多个逻辑可以相互兼容,中心逻辑影响外围逻辑,组织对制度复杂性的反应在职业体育联盟中可能有所不同。亮点职业运动队在日益复杂的体制环境中运作。组织通过将社区活动与商业目标分离或使社区活动与之相一致来应对制度复杂性。由商业逻辑指导的社区活动侧重于商业成果,如粉丝、赞助和品牌。关注社会逻辑的社区活动以社区成果为目标,如健康、教育、参与和信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“My definition of community is community, and their definition is more around fan engagement”: balancing business and social logics of professional sport teams’ community activities
ABSTRACT Professional sport teams operate within an increasingly complex institutional environment and are required to often confront incompatible prescriptions from multiple institutional logics, such as performance and commercial goals (i.e., business logics) relative to community development and altruistic goals (i.e., social logics). The aim of this research is to investigate the influence of institutional complexity on managers perceptions of community-oriented practices across 12 professional teams within a single Australian sport league. Using Raynard’s (2016) configurations of institutional complexity, we identify two types of hybrid responses that professional teams utilise to address multiple logics: aligned and segregated. When community managers perceived social logics to be aligned with business logics, community activities were more aligned with commercial organisational outcomes such as brand, fan and sponsorship benefits. Alternatively, when managers perceived social logics to be segregated from business logics, community activities were more autonomous from commercial drivers, allowing a greater focus on community development outcomes including education, health and increased trust. Theoretically, our research adds to institutional logic scholarship by showing that multiple logics can be compatible with each other, central logics influence peripheral logics and organisational responses to institutional complexity can vary within a professional sport league. HIGHLIGHTS Professional sport teams are operating in increasingly complex institutional environments. Organisations responded to institutional complexity by either segregating community activities from, or aligning community activities with commercial goals. Community activities that were directed by business logics focused upon commercial outcomes, such as fans, sponsorships, and branding. Community activities that focused upon social logics targeted community outcomes, such as health, education, engagement, and trust.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
7.30%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Sport Management Review is published as a service to sport industries worldwide. It is a multidisciplinary journal concerned with the management, marketing, and governance of sport at all levels and in all its manifestations -- whether as an entertainment, a recreation, or an occupation. The journal encourages collaboration between scholars and practitioners. It welcomes submissions reporting research, new applications, advances in theory, and case studies. The language of publication is English. Submissions are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Pollination, cultivation, and perennialization: creating the amateur logic in collegiate sport Public perception of esports: an examination of esports image and genre differences Leadership development: relationality and temporality in professional sport Musical congruity in sports: enhancing team branding in esports and traditional sports Market demand for metaverse-based sporting events: a mixed-methods approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1