{"title":"医学一年级学生不同教学方法的比较:主观上与客观上的比较","authors":"Dr Madhura V. Motagi","doi":"10.37506/ijop.v8i3.1330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Our study was to compare three different teaching method in first year medical students. Objectives: To assess the outcome and perception of students towards teaching method. Method: 150 students were divided randomly in to 3 different groups as group A (attended Lecture), group B (attended demonstration) group C [attended small group discussion (SGD)], topic was Introduction to BP. As a pretest all the groups had answered a set of structured 25 MCQs, after attending their respective teaching sessions, immediately post test I and after 1 month post-test II was conducted. For subjective assessment likert scale was used. Statistical Analysis: Paired t test was used for comparison. “P”<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: There was a significant difference between pre-test and post-test I, pre-test and post-test II in all the groups (P<0.001). When we compared post-test I and II, group A and B showed the significant difference (P<0.05), as their performance in post-test II has reduced, but there was no significant difference showed by group C between post-test I and II, as their performance in post-test II has not reduced. Subjectively also Students preferred SGD as better teaching method. Concussion: Looking at results, clearly states that the SGD is better compared to other two method, both subjectively and objectively.","PeriodicalId":92916,"journal":{"name":"International journal of physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Different Teaching Method in First Year Medical Students: Both Subjectively and Objectively\",\"authors\":\"Dr Madhura V. Motagi\",\"doi\":\"10.37506/ijop.v8i3.1330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: Our study was to compare three different teaching method in first year medical students. Objectives: To assess the outcome and perception of students towards teaching method. Method: 150 students were divided randomly in to 3 different groups as group A (attended Lecture), group B (attended demonstration) group C [attended small group discussion (SGD)], topic was Introduction to BP. As a pretest all the groups had answered a set of structured 25 MCQs, after attending their respective teaching sessions, immediately post test I and after 1 month post-test II was conducted. For subjective assessment likert scale was used. Statistical Analysis: Paired t test was used for comparison. “P”<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: There was a significant difference between pre-test and post-test I, pre-test and post-test II in all the groups (P<0.001). When we compared post-test I and II, group A and B showed the significant difference (P<0.05), as their performance in post-test II has reduced, but there was no significant difference showed by group C between post-test I and II, as their performance in post-test II has not reduced. Subjectively also Students preferred SGD as better teaching method. Concussion: Looking at results, clearly states that the SGD is better compared to other two method, both subjectively and objectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37506/ijop.v8i3.1330\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37506/ijop.v8i3.1330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of Different Teaching Method in First Year Medical Students: Both Subjectively and Objectively
Aim: Our study was to compare three different teaching method in first year medical students. Objectives: To assess the outcome and perception of students towards teaching method. Method: 150 students were divided randomly in to 3 different groups as group A (attended Lecture), group B (attended demonstration) group C [attended small group discussion (SGD)], topic was Introduction to BP. As a pretest all the groups had answered a set of structured 25 MCQs, after attending their respective teaching sessions, immediately post test I and after 1 month post-test II was conducted. For subjective assessment likert scale was used. Statistical Analysis: Paired t test was used for comparison. “P”<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: There was a significant difference between pre-test and post-test I, pre-test and post-test II in all the groups (P<0.001). When we compared post-test I and II, group A and B showed the significant difference (P<0.05), as their performance in post-test II has reduced, but there was no significant difference showed by group C between post-test I and II, as their performance in post-test II has not reduced. Subjectively also Students preferred SGD as better teaching method. Concussion: Looking at results, clearly states that the SGD is better compared to other two method, both subjectively and objectively.