英语之外的语言模式公平:差距与挑战

Krithika Ramesh, Sunayana Sitaram, M. Choudhury
{"title":"英语之外的语言模式公平:差距与挑战","authors":"Krithika Ramesh, Sunayana Sitaram, M. Choudhury","doi":"10.48550/arXiv.2302.12578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With language models becoming increasingly ubiquitous, it has become essential to address their inequitable treatment of diverse demographic groups and factors. Most research on evaluating and mitigating fairness harms has been concentrated on English, while multilingual models and non-English languages have received comparatively little attention. In this paper, we survey different aspects of fairness in languages beyond English and multilingual contexts. This paper presents a survey of fairness in multilingual and non-English contexts, highlighting the shortcomings of current research and the difficulties faced by methods designed for English. We contend that the multitude of diverse cultures and languages across the world makes it infeasible to achieve comprehensive coverage in terms of constructing fairness datasets. Thus, the measurement and mitigation of biases must evolve beyond the current dataset-driven practices that are narrowly focused on specific dimensions and types of biases and, therefore, impossible to scale across languages and cultures.","PeriodicalId":73025,"journal":{"name":"Findings (Sydney (N.S.W.)","volume":"1 1","pages":"2061-2074"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fairness in Language Models Beyond English: Gaps and Challenges\",\"authors\":\"Krithika Ramesh, Sunayana Sitaram, M. Choudhury\",\"doi\":\"10.48550/arXiv.2302.12578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With language models becoming increasingly ubiquitous, it has become essential to address their inequitable treatment of diverse demographic groups and factors. Most research on evaluating and mitigating fairness harms has been concentrated on English, while multilingual models and non-English languages have received comparatively little attention. In this paper, we survey different aspects of fairness in languages beyond English and multilingual contexts. This paper presents a survey of fairness in multilingual and non-English contexts, highlighting the shortcomings of current research and the difficulties faced by methods designed for English. We contend that the multitude of diverse cultures and languages across the world makes it infeasible to achieve comprehensive coverage in terms of constructing fairness datasets. Thus, the measurement and mitigation of biases must evolve beyond the current dataset-driven practices that are narrowly focused on specific dimensions and types of biases and, therefore, impossible to scale across languages and cultures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Findings (Sydney (N.S.W.)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"2061-2074\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Findings (Sydney (N.S.W.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.12578\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Findings (Sydney (N.S.W.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2302.12578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

随着语言模型变得越来越普遍,解决它们对不同人口群体和因素的不公平对待变得至关重要。评估和减轻公平损害的研究大多集中在英语领域,而多语言模型和非英语语言受到的关注相对较少。在本文中,我们调查了英语和多语言语境之外的语言中公平的不同方面。本文对多语言和非英语环境下的公平进行了调查,强调了当前研究的不足和为英语设计的方法所面临的困难。我们认为,世界各地的多种文化和语言使得在构建公平数据集方面实现全面覆盖是不可能的。因此,衡量和减轻偏见必须超越目前数据集驱动的做法,这些做法狭隘地关注特定的维度和类型的偏见,因此不可能跨语言和文化进行扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fairness in Language Models Beyond English: Gaps and Challenges
With language models becoming increasingly ubiquitous, it has become essential to address their inequitable treatment of diverse demographic groups and factors. Most research on evaluating and mitigating fairness harms has been concentrated on English, while multilingual models and non-English languages have received comparatively little attention. In this paper, we survey different aspects of fairness in languages beyond English and multilingual contexts. This paper presents a survey of fairness in multilingual and non-English contexts, highlighting the shortcomings of current research and the difficulties faced by methods designed for English. We contend that the multitude of diverse cultures and languages across the world makes it infeasible to achieve comprehensive coverage in terms of constructing fairness datasets. Thus, the measurement and mitigation of biases must evolve beyond the current dataset-driven practices that are narrowly focused on specific dimensions and types of biases and, therefore, impossible to scale across languages and cultures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring Pedestrian Injury Severity by Incorporating Spatial Information in Machine Learning Darkness and Death in the U.S.: Walking Distances Across the Nation by Time of Day and Time of Year Activity Reduction as Resilience Indicator: Evidence with Filomena Data The Lifestyle and Mobility Connection of Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) Users Transit Fleet Electrification Barriers, Resolutions and Costs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1