增材制造材料与动物血管的摩擦比较

Juliane Kuhl, Johann Hauschild, Dieter Krause
{"title":"增材制造材料与动物血管的摩擦比较","authors":"Juliane Kuhl,&nbsp;Johann Hauschild,&nbsp;Dieter Krause","doi":"10.1016/j.stlm.2022.100061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The replication of blood vessels for training and research purposes is possible with the help of additively manufactured (AM) models. However, a meaningful evaluation of the quality of the haptics, here concentrating on friction characteristics, of additively manufactured blood vessel models compared to human vessels is difficult and often only based on subjective assessments. To enable an objective comparison of friction of different AM materials, tests were performed in which a braided stent was pulled through straight test tubes. The force required to do so was measured. The same test setup was used to examine animal blood vessels so that these results could be compared with the findings of the AM materials. In addition, physicians were asked for their assessment of the haptics concerning friction of different materials. Summarizing the results, for the tested Formlabs materials <em>Flexible 80A</em> and <em>Elastic 50A, i</em>t can be stated that <em>Flexible 80A</em> is strongly recommended for the replication of blood vessels - even though it is comparatively smooth. The <em>Elastic 50A</em> should only be used for training with increased difficulty since the models are stickier and a flipping of instruments is possible. Coating the materials only involve effort that is not reflected in the benefits.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72210,"journal":{"name":"Annals of 3D printed medicine","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100061"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964122000170/pdfft?md5=324acc601bd1278f6535042befe377c2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666964122000170-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing friction of additively manufactured materials with animal blood vessels\",\"authors\":\"Juliane Kuhl,&nbsp;Johann Hauschild,&nbsp;Dieter Krause\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stlm.2022.100061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The replication of blood vessels for training and research purposes is possible with the help of additively manufactured (AM) models. However, a meaningful evaluation of the quality of the haptics, here concentrating on friction characteristics, of additively manufactured blood vessel models compared to human vessels is difficult and often only based on subjective assessments. To enable an objective comparison of friction of different AM materials, tests were performed in which a braided stent was pulled through straight test tubes. The force required to do so was measured. The same test setup was used to examine animal blood vessels so that these results could be compared with the findings of the AM materials. In addition, physicians were asked for their assessment of the haptics concerning friction of different materials. Summarizing the results, for the tested Formlabs materials <em>Flexible 80A</em> and <em>Elastic 50A, i</em>t can be stated that <em>Flexible 80A</em> is strongly recommended for the replication of blood vessels - even though it is comparatively smooth. The <em>Elastic 50A</em> should only be used for training with increased difficulty since the models are stickier and a flipping of instruments is possible. Coating the materials only involve effort that is not reflected in the benefits.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of 3D printed medicine\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100061\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964122000170/pdfft?md5=324acc601bd1278f6535042befe377c2&pid=1-s2.0-S2666964122000170-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of 3D printed medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964122000170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of 3D printed medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964122000170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在增材制造(AM)模型的帮助下,用于训练和研究目的的血管复制成为可能。然而,对增材制造血管模型的触觉质量进行有意义的评估是困难的,并且通常只基于主观评估,这里主要集中在摩擦特性上。为了客观比较不同AM材料的摩擦,进行了将编织支架拉过直试管的测试。测量了这样做所需的力。同样的测试装置用于检查动物血管,以便这些结果可以与AM材料的结果进行比较。此外,医生被要求对不同材料的摩擦触觉进行评估。综上所述,对于测试的Formlabs材料Flexible 80A和Elastic 50A,可以声明,尽管柔性80A相对光滑,但强烈推荐用于血管复制。弹性50A应该只用于训练增加难度,因为模型是粘性和翻转仪器是可能的。涂覆材料只需要付出努力,而没有反映在收益中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing friction of additively manufactured materials with animal blood vessels

The replication of blood vessels for training and research purposes is possible with the help of additively manufactured (AM) models. However, a meaningful evaluation of the quality of the haptics, here concentrating on friction characteristics, of additively manufactured blood vessel models compared to human vessels is difficult and often only based on subjective assessments. To enable an objective comparison of friction of different AM materials, tests were performed in which a braided stent was pulled through straight test tubes. The force required to do so was measured. The same test setup was used to examine animal blood vessels so that these results could be compared with the findings of the AM materials. In addition, physicians were asked for their assessment of the haptics concerning friction of different materials. Summarizing the results, for the tested Formlabs materials Flexible 80A and Elastic 50A, it can be stated that Flexible 80A is strongly recommended for the replication of blood vessels - even though it is comparatively smooth. The Elastic 50A should only be used for training with increased difficulty since the models are stickier and a flipping of instruments is possible. Coating the materials only involve effort that is not reflected in the benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of 3D printed medicine
Annals of 3D printed medicine Medicine and Dentistry (General), Materials Science (General)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
131 days
期刊最新文献
Voluminous fronto-parietal osteomas: Guided resection with patient-specific cutting guides and reconstruction with a 3D printed hydroxyapatite implant A bibliometric analysis of publications in 3D printing in surgery from the web of science database Scalable direct manufacturing of a functional multipurpose wrist-hand orthosis using 3D printing Multi-resin 3D printing of radiopaque customized artificial tooth for revolutionizing preclinical training on root canal treatment Pelvic osteotomies for correction of sagittal imbalance of the spine: An in-silico study comparing four different osteotomies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1