反思排便姿势和练习的有效性：这不是你做什么，而是你做的方式！

Q4 Environmental Science Waterlines Pub Date : 2017-10-01 DOI:10.3362/1756-3488.17-00019

C. Edgar, M. Sohail, S. Cavill

{"title":"反思排便姿势和练习的有效性：这不是你做什么，而是你做的方式！","authors":"C. Edgar, M. Sohail, S. Cavill","doi":"10.3362/1756-3488.17-00019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reports on a piece of research to investigate the effectiveness of defecation postures and anal cleansing method. The research compared how long each bowel movement took on a pedestal toilet with and without a footstool. Volunteers were asked to compare the two positions for speed as well as stress/strain on the body. The effectiveness of the method of anal cleansing was also rated by a subset of the volunteers. Although the study was conducted using volunteers in the UK, the findings have international relevance for sanitation marketing and hygiene promotion programmes.","PeriodicalId":39265,"journal":{"name":"Waterlines","volume":"36 1","pages":"367-374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking the effectiveness of defecation postures and practices: it’s not what you do it’s the way that you do it!\",\"authors\":\"C. Edgar, M. Sohail, S. Cavill\",\"doi\":\"10.3362/1756-3488.17-00019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper reports on a piece of research to investigate the effectiveness of defecation postures and anal cleansing method. The research compared how long each bowel movement took on a pedestal toilet with and without a footstool. Volunteers were asked to compare the two positions for speed as well as stress/strain on the body. The effectiveness of the method of anal cleansing was also rated by a subset of the volunteers. Although the study was conducted using volunteers in the UK, the findings have international relevance for sanitation marketing and hygiene promotion programmes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39265,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Waterlines\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"367-374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Waterlines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.17-00019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waterlines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3362/1756-3488.17-00019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

本文报道了一项研究，探讨排便姿势和肛门清洁方法的有效性。该研究比较了在有脚凳和没有脚凳的坐便器上每次排便所需的时间。志愿者们被要求比较这两种姿势的速度以及对身体的压力/张力。一部分志愿者还对肛门清洁方法的有效性进行了评估。虽然这项研究是在英国进行的，但研究结果对卫生营销和卫生促进计划具有国际相关性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Rethinking the effectiveness of defecation postures and practices: it’s not what you do it’s the way that you do it!

This paper reports on a piece of research to investigate the effectiveness of defecation postures and anal cleansing method. The research compared how long each bowel movement took on a pedestal toilet with and without a footstool. Volunteers were asked to compare the two positions for speed as well as stress/strain on the body. The effectiveness of the method of anal cleansing was also rated by a subset of the volunteers. Although the study was conducted using volunteers in the UK, the findings have international relevance for sanitation marketing and hygiene promotion programmes.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Waterlines Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Published since 1982 Waterlines is a refereed journal providing a forum for those involved in extending water supply, sanitation, hygiene and waste management to all in developing countries. Waterlines aims to bridge the gap between research and practice: it encourages papers written by researchers for the benefit of practice and those written by practitioners to inform research and policy. It highlights information sources and promotes debate between different perspectives. Waterlines considers the key challenges facing those in the water and sanitation sector–engineers, health professionals.