协调安全的地球目标和地球正义:为什么社会科学家应该参与地球目标?

IF 4.4 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Earth System Governance Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.esg.2021.100122
J. Gupta , D. Liverman , X. Bai , C. Gordon , M. Hurlbert , C.Y.A. Inoue , L. Jacobson , N. Kanie , T.M. Lenton , D. Obura , I.M. Otto , C. Okereke , L. Pereira , K. Prodani , C. Rammelt , J. Scholtens , J.D. Tàbara , P.H. Verburg , L. Gifford , D. Ciobanu
{"title":"协调安全的地球目标和地球正义:为什么社会科学家应该参与地球目标?","authors":"J. Gupta ,&nbsp;D. Liverman ,&nbsp;X. Bai ,&nbsp;C. Gordon ,&nbsp;M. Hurlbert ,&nbsp;C.Y.A. Inoue ,&nbsp;L. Jacobson ,&nbsp;N. Kanie ,&nbsp;T.M. Lenton ,&nbsp;D. Obura ,&nbsp;I.M. Otto ,&nbsp;C. Okereke ,&nbsp;L. Pereira ,&nbsp;K. Prodani ,&nbsp;C. Rammelt ,&nbsp;J. Scholtens ,&nbsp;J.D. Tàbara ,&nbsp;P.H. Verburg ,&nbsp;L. Gifford ,&nbsp;D. Ciobanu","doi":"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As human activity threatens to make the planet unsafe for humanity and other life forms, scholars are identifying planetary targets set at a safe distance from biophysical thresholds beyond which critical Earth systems may collapse. Yet despite the profound implications that both meeting and transgressing such targets may have for human wellbeing, including the potential for negative trade-offs, there is limited social science analysis that systematically considers the justice dimensions of such targets. Here we assess a range of views on planetary justice and present three arguments associated with why social scientists should engage with the scholarship on safe targets. We argue that complementing safe targets with just targets offers a fruitful approach for considering synergies and trade-offs between environmental and social aspirations and can inform inclusive deliberation on these important issues.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":33685,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Governance","volume":"10 ","pages":"Article 100122"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811621000264/pdfft?md5=19c6c615c77374e7366d2cfd4b353e43&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811621000264-main.pdf","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconciling safe planetary targets and planetary justice: Why should social scientists engage with planetary targets?\",\"authors\":\"J. Gupta ,&nbsp;D. Liverman ,&nbsp;X. Bai ,&nbsp;C. Gordon ,&nbsp;M. Hurlbert ,&nbsp;C.Y.A. Inoue ,&nbsp;L. Jacobson ,&nbsp;N. Kanie ,&nbsp;T.M. Lenton ,&nbsp;D. Obura ,&nbsp;I.M. Otto ,&nbsp;C. Okereke ,&nbsp;L. Pereira ,&nbsp;K. Prodani ,&nbsp;C. Rammelt ,&nbsp;J. Scholtens ,&nbsp;J.D. Tàbara ,&nbsp;P.H. Verburg ,&nbsp;L. Gifford ,&nbsp;D. Ciobanu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esg.2021.100122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>As human activity threatens to make the planet unsafe for humanity and other life forms, scholars are identifying planetary targets set at a safe distance from biophysical thresholds beyond which critical Earth systems may collapse. Yet despite the profound implications that both meeting and transgressing such targets may have for human wellbeing, including the potential for negative trade-offs, there is limited social science analysis that systematically considers the justice dimensions of such targets. Here we assess a range of views on planetary justice and present three arguments associated with why social scientists should engage with the scholarship on safe targets. We argue that complementing safe targets with just targets offers a fruitful approach for considering synergies and trade-offs between environmental and social aspirations and can inform inclusive deliberation on these important issues.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth System Governance\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811621000264/pdfft?md5=19c6c615c77374e7366d2cfd4b353e43&pid=1-s2.0-S2589811621000264-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth System Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811621000264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811621000264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

由于人类活动威胁到地球对人类和其他生命形式的安全,学者们正在确定与生物物理阈值保持安全距离的行星目标,超过这些阈值,关键的地球系统可能会崩溃。然而,尽管达到和超越这些目标可能对人类福祉产生深远影响,包括潜在的负面权衡,但系统地考虑这些目标的正义维度的社会科学分析有限。在这里,我们评估了一系列关于行星正义的观点,并提出了三个与社会科学家为什么应该参与安全目标奖学金相关的论点。我们认为,将安全目标与公正目标相辅相成,为考虑环境和社会愿望之间的协同作用和权衡提供了一种富有成效的方法,并可以为这些重要问题的包容性审议提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reconciling safe planetary targets and planetary justice: Why should social scientists engage with planetary targets?

As human activity threatens to make the planet unsafe for humanity and other life forms, scholars are identifying planetary targets set at a safe distance from biophysical thresholds beyond which critical Earth systems may collapse. Yet despite the profound implications that both meeting and transgressing such targets may have for human wellbeing, including the potential for negative trade-offs, there is limited social science analysis that systematically considers the justice dimensions of such targets. Here we assess a range of views on planetary justice and present three arguments associated with why social scientists should engage with the scholarship on safe targets. We argue that complementing safe targets with just targets offers a fruitful approach for considering synergies and trade-offs between environmental and social aspirations and can inform inclusive deliberation on these important issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
31
审稿时长
35 weeks
期刊最新文献
Diversifying climate policy advice: Research agenda on the expertise of national climate councils Jurisdictional approaches to sustainable agro-commodity governance: The state of knowledge and future research directions Towards sustainable governance of freshwater sand – A resource regime approach Exploring the rights of nature in freshwater and marine ecosystems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1