超高分子量聚乙烯电缆的接触压力是钛缆的两倍

Rina Sakai , Toki Yada , Kazuhiro Yoshida , Katsufumi Uchiyama , Masanobu Ujihira
{"title":"超高分子量聚乙烯电缆的接触压力是钛缆的两倍","authors":"Rina Sakai ,&nbsp;Toki Yada ,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Yoshida ,&nbsp;Katsufumi Uchiyama ,&nbsp;Masanobu Ujihira","doi":"10.1016/j.jajs.2021.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Metal cables exhibit favorable clinical performance because of their high fixing force. Cables composed of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) are relatively new and were first used for trauma around 2010; only a few cases involving the use of UHMWPE cables have been reported. Surgeons need to know whether the fixing force of UHMWPE cables is higher or lower than that of metal cables. This study aims to compare the fixing forces of UHMWPE cables and a titanium cable using the contact pressure as an index.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p><span>We studied UHMWPE cables with widths of 3 mm and 5 mm and a titanium cable. A thin pressure sensor was set on the femoral diaphysis, and the cables were wrapped on simulated tissues and tightened with clamping forces based on the indication values displayed on the tensioner of each cable. During osteosynthesis, tissues can remain unremoved depending on the fracture site and procedure. </span><em>Sus scrofa</em> domesticus thigh tissues with thicknesses of 2 mm and 5 mm were prepared for simulating tissues, and the contact pressures in cases with and without tissues were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>When no tissues were remained, the contact pressure of the titanium cable with a clamping force of 50 kgf was equal to that of the UHMWPE cables with a clamping force of 30 kgf. When tissues were remained, the contact pressure of the titanium cable with a clamping force of 50 kgf was twice as high as that of the UHMWPE cables with a clamping force of 30 kgf.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>It was revealed that the contact pressure of UHMWPE cables clamped with the maximum force was twice as high as that of metal cables. This result is expected to contribute toward the selection of cables according to a desired clamping force.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38088,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery","volume":"8 3","pages":"Pages 276-281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jajs.2021.04.008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The contact pressure of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene cables is twice as high as that of titanium cables\",\"authors\":\"Rina Sakai ,&nbsp;Toki Yada ,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Yoshida ,&nbsp;Katsufumi Uchiyama ,&nbsp;Masanobu Ujihira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jajs.2021.04.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Metal cables exhibit favorable clinical performance because of their high fixing force. Cables composed of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) are relatively new and were first used for trauma around 2010; only a few cases involving the use of UHMWPE cables have been reported. Surgeons need to know whether the fixing force of UHMWPE cables is higher or lower than that of metal cables. This study aims to compare the fixing forces of UHMWPE cables and a titanium cable using the contact pressure as an index.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p><span>We studied UHMWPE cables with widths of 3 mm and 5 mm and a titanium cable. A thin pressure sensor was set on the femoral diaphysis, and the cables were wrapped on simulated tissues and tightened with clamping forces based on the indication values displayed on the tensioner of each cable. During osteosynthesis, tissues can remain unremoved depending on the fracture site and procedure. </span><em>Sus scrofa</em> domesticus thigh tissues with thicknesses of 2 mm and 5 mm were prepared for simulating tissues, and the contact pressures in cases with and without tissues were compared.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>When no tissues were remained, the contact pressure of the titanium cable with a clamping force of 50 kgf was equal to that of the UHMWPE cables with a clamping force of 30 kgf. When tissues were remained, the contact pressure of the titanium cable with a clamping force of 50 kgf was twice as high as that of the UHMWPE cables with a clamping force of 30 kgf.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>It was revealed that the contact pressure of UHMWPE cables clamped with the maximum force was twice as high as that of metal cables. This result is expected to contribute toward the selection of cables according to a desired clamping force.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery\",\"volume\":\"8 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 276-281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jajs.2021.04.008\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214963521000456\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214963521000456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景金属电缆具有较高的固定力,具有良好的临床应用价值。由超高分子量聚乙烯(UHMWPE)组成的电缆相对较新,于2010年左右首次用于创伤;仅报道了几起涉及使用超高分子量聚乙烯电缆的案件。外科医生需要了解超高分子量聚乙烯电缆的固定力是高于还是低于金属电缆。本研究旨在以接触压力为指标,比较超高分子量聚乙烯电缆与钛缆的固定力。方法研究了直径分别为3mm和5mm的超高分子量聚乙烯(UHMWPE)电缆和钛缆。在股骨干上设置一个薄压力传感器,将电缆包裹在模拟组织上,根据每根电缆张紧器上显示的指示值用夹紧力拧紧。在植骨过程中,根据骨折部位和手术,组织可以保持不变。制备厚度分别为2mm和5mm的家鸡大腿组织作为模拟组织,比较有组织和无组织情况下的接触压力。结果在无组织残留情况下,夹紧力为50 kgf的钛缆与夹紧力为30 kgf的超高分子量聚乙烯(UHMWPE)缆的接触压力相等。在保留组织的情况下,夹紧力为50 kgf的钛缆的接触压力是夹紧力为30 kgf的超高分子量聚乙烯电缆的两倍。结论用最大力夹紧超高分子量聚乙烯电缆的接触压力是金属电缆的2倍。这一结果预计有助于根据所需的夹紧力选择电缆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The contact pressure of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene cables is twice as high as that of titanium cables

Background

Metal cables exhibit favorable clinical performance because of their high fixing force. Cables composed of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) are relatively new and were first used for trauma around 2010; only a few cases involving the use of UHMWPE cables have been reported. Surgeons need to know whether the fixing force of UHMWPE cables is higher or lower than that of metal cables. This study aims to compare the fixing forces of UHMWPE cables and a titanium cable using the contact pressure as an index.

Method

We studied UHMWPE cables with widths of 3 mm and 5 mm and a titanium cable. A thin pressure sensor was set on the femoral diaphysis, and the cables were wrapped on simulated tissues and tightened with clamping forces based on the indication values displayed on the tensioner of each cable. During osteosynthesis, tissues can remain unremoved depending on the fracture site and procedure. Sus scrofa domesticus thigh tissues with thicknesses of 2 mm and 5 mm were prepared for simulating tissues, and the contact pressures in cases with and without tissues were compared.

Results

When no tissues were remained, the contact pressure of the titanium cable with a clamping force of 50 kgf was equal to that of the UHMWPE cables with a clamping force of 30 kgf. When tissues were remained, the contact pressure of the titanium cable with a clamping force of 50 kgf was twice as high as that of the UHMWPE cables with a clamping force of 30 kgf.

Conclusion

It was revealed that the contact pressure of UHMWPE cables clamped with the maximum force was twice as high as that of metal cables. This result is expected to contribute toward the selection of cables according to a desired clamping force.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery
Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Journal of Arthroscopy and Joint Surgery (JAJS) is committed to bring forth scientific manuscripts in the form of original research articles, current concept reviews, meta-analyses, case reports and letters to the editor. The focus of the Journal is to present wide-ranging, multi-disciplinary perspectives on the problems of the joints that are amenable with Arthroscopy and Arthroplasty. Though Arthroscopy and Arthroplasty entail surgical procedures, the Journal shall not restrict itself to these purely surgical procedures and will also encompass pharmacological, rehabilitative and physical measures that can prevent or postpone the execution of a surgical procedure. The Journal will also publish scientific research related to tissues other than joints that would ultimately have an effect on the joint function.
期刊最新文献
Arthroscopically Assisted Technique in the Treatment of Ankle Fractures with Posterior Malleolus Fragment in Adults Trabecular Metal Augments for Reconstruction of Acetabular Bone Defects in Revision Total Hip Replacement: Short-Term Outcomes Is Arthroscopic Management of Synovial Chondromatosis of the Hip Enough? Short-Term Results after Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Functional and Radiological Outcomes of a Newly Introduced Modified Manual Cementation Technique Versus Second-Generation Technique in Primary Cemented Hip Arthroplasty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1