识别和定义与坠落风险评估工具中发现的坠落风险因素事件相关的实体

Fatimah Altuhaifa , Dalal Al Tuhaifa , Eman Al Ribh , Ezdehar Al Rebh
{"title":"识别和定义与坠落风险评估工具中发现的坠落风险因素事件相关的实体","authors":"Fatimah Altuhaifa ,&nbsp;Dalal Al Tuhaifa ,&nbsp;Eman Al Ribh ,&nbsp;Ezdehar Al Rebh","doi":"10.1016/j.cmpbup.2023.100105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The contents of nursing notes play an important role in predicting patient fall risk. Based on data collected from fall risk assessment tools, we aimed to identify and define fall risk factors to support natural language processing, data mining of nursing notes, and automated fall prediction.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PRISMA-ScR guidelines were used to summarize entities associated with the fall risk factors described in fall risk assessment tools. Fall risk factors (concepts) and their related words (entities) were extracted from the tools. In order to clarify the meaning of unclear fall risk factors and classify fall risk factor entities, we searched the websites of the World Health Organization and the governments of Victoria, Australia, and New South Wales (up to 20 December 2021). A nurse and a safety expert reviewed and assessed the extracted concepts and entities for clarity and relevance. Then, the NLPfallRisk tool was developed to extract entities associated with fall risk factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 20 validated fall risk assessment tools appropriate for hospitals and healthcare facilities. Using these tools, we extracted 19 especially significant risk factors as the most significant and identified 151 entities related to them.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We found that fall assessment tools considered a history of falls more frequently than any other risk factor. However, as fall risk tends to be multifaceted, risk assessments must take many factors into account.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72670,"journal":{"name":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying and defining entities associated with fall risk factors events found in fall risk assessment tools\",\"authors\":\"Fatimah Altuhaifa ,&nbsp;Dalal Al Tuhaifa ,&nbsp;Eman Al Ribh ,&nbsp;Ezdehar Al Rebh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cmpbup.2023.100105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The contents of nursing notes play an important role in predicting patient fall risk. Based on data collected from fall risk assessment tools, we aimed to identify and define fall risk factors to support natural language processing, data mining of nursing notes, and automated fall prediction.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PRISMA-ScR guidelines were used to summarize entities associated with the fall risk factors described in fall risk assessment tools. Fall risk factors (concepts) and their related words (entities) were extracted from the tools. In order to clarify the meaning of unclear fall risk factors and classify fall risk factor entities, we searched the websites of the World Health Organization and the governments of Victoria, Australia, and New South Wales (up to 20 December 2021). A nurse and a safety expert reviewed and assessed the extracted concepts and entities for clarity and relevance. Then, the NLPfallRisk tool was developed to extract entities associated with fall risk factors.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We identified 20 validated fall risk assessment tools appropriate for hospitals and healthcare facilities. Using these tools, we extracted 19 especially significant risk factors as the most significant and identified 151 entities related to them.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We found that fall assessment tools considered a history of falls more frequently than any other risk factor. However, as fall risk tends to be multifaceted, risk assessments must take many factors into account.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update\",\"volume\":\"3 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990023000149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer methods and programs in biomedicine update","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666990023000149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的护理笔记内容对预测患者跌倒风险有重要作用。基于从跌倒风险评估工具收集的数据,我们旨在识别和定义跌倒风险因素,以支持自然语言处理、护理笔记数据挖掘和自动跌倒预测。方法采用PRISMA-ScR指南,总结跌倒风险评估工具中描述的与跌倒危险因素相关的实体。从工具中提取跌倒危险因素(概念)及其相关词(实体)。为了澄清不明确的跌倒危险因素的含义并对跌倒危险因素实体进行分类,我们检索了世界卫生组织和维多利亚州、澳大利亚和新南威尔士州政府的网站(截至2021年12月20日)。一名护士和一名安全专家审查和评估了提取的概念和实体的清晰度和相关性。然后,开发了NLPfallRisk工具来提取与跌倒风险因素相关的实体。结果我们确定了适用于医院和医疗机构的20种经过验证的跌倒风险评估工具。使用这些工具,我们提取了19个特别重要的风险因素作为最重要的因素,并确定了151个与之相关的实体。结论:我们发现跌倒评估工具比任何其他危险因素更频繁地考虑跌倒史。然而,由于跌倒风险往往是多方面的,风险评估必须考虑许多因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identifying and defining entities associated with fall risk factors events found in fall risk assessment tools

Purpose

The contents of nursing notes play an important role in predicting patient fall risk. Based on data collected from fall risk assessment tools, we aimed to identify and define fall risk factors to support natural language processing, data mining of nursing notes, and automated fall prediction.

Methods

The PRISMA-ScR guidelines were used to summarize entities associated with the fall risk factors described in fall risk assessment tools. Fall risk factors (concepts) and their related words (entities) were extracted from the tools. In order to clarify the meaning of unclear fall risk factors and classify fall risk factor entities, we searched the websites of the World Health Organization and the governments of Victoria, Australia, and New South Wales (up to 20 December 2021). A nurse and a safety expert reviewed and assessed the extracted concepts and entities for clarity and relevance. Then, the NLPfallRisk tool was developed to extract entities associated with fall risk factors.

Results

We identified 20 validated fall risk assessment tools appropriate for hospitals and healthcare facilities. Using these tools, we extracted 19 especially significant risk factors as the most significant and identified 151 entities related to them.

Conclusion

We found that fall assessment tools considered a history of falls more frequently than any other risk factor. However, as fall risk tends to be multifaceted, risk assessments must take many factors into account.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Fostering digital health literacy to enhance trust and improve health outcomes Machine learning from real data: A mental health registry case study ResfEANet: ResNet-fused External Attention Network for Tuberculosis Diagnosis using Chest X-ray Images Role-playing recovery in social virtual worlds: Adult use of child avatars as PTSD therapy Comparative evaluation of low-cost 3D scanning devices for ear acquisition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1