学校参观科学博物馆:教师实践分析的框架

IF 2.1 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Science Teacher Education Pub Date : 2022-09-06 DOI:10.1080/1046560X.2022.2103010
Vanessa M. Souza, V. Bonifácio, A. Rodrigues
{"title":"学校参观科学博物馆:教师实践分析的框架","authors":"Vanessa M. Souza, V. Bonifácio, A. Rodrigues","doi":"10.1080/1046560X.2022.2103010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT School visits to science museums are recognized educational resources that provide students with unique learning experiences, if teachers intentionally plan these. Surprisingly one finds that investigations analyzing teachers adopted practices by systematic monitoring, without researcher intervention, are almost non-existent in the literature. We developed the School Visits Articulated Framework (SVAF) to identify and classify (through levels’ scale) the school visits planning practices. The mainly objective was to reach a characterization of teachers’ practices in a perspective of articulations formal education and non-formal education contexts may then be defined. In this article, we describe how we applied the SVAF on five case studies configured as school visits to a science museum, simultaneously we test the framework efficiency. The analysis of the visit plan from the perspective of the SVAF allowed us to identify moments in which the teachers’ practices did not meet expectations according to the literature in the area. Likewise, it revealed the predominance of activities carried out in the steps before the visit to the museum and emphasized the lack of activities carried out in the museum and on returning to school after the visit. These results allow us to better outline the objectives and needs to be met in the initial and continuous training courses for teachers and museum educators, aiming at the best use of this resource for student learning. The SVAF is a framework capable of to identify and classify the teachers’ practices, since the instruments it integrates provided important and detailed information.","PeriodicalId":47326,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science Teacher Education","volume":"34 1","pages":"329 - 351"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"School Visits to Science Museums: A Framework for Analyzing Teacher Practices\",\"authors\":\"Vanessa M. Souza, V. Bonifácio, A. Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1046560X.2022.2103010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT School visits to science museums are recognized educational resources that provide students with unique learning experiences, if teachers intentionally plan these. Surprisingly one finds that investigations analyzing teachers adopted practices by systematic monitoring, without researcher intervention, are almost non-existent in the literature. We developed the School Visits Articulated Framework (SVAF) to identify and classify (through levels’ scale) the school visits planning practices. The mainly objective was to reach a characterization of teachers’ practices in a perspective of articulations formal education and non-formal education contexts may then be defined. In this article, we describe how we applied the SVAF on five case studies configured as school visits to a science museum, simultaneously we test the framework efficiency. The analysis of the visit plan from the perspective of the SVAF allowed us to identify moments in which the teachers’ practices did not meet expectations according to the literature in the area. Likewise, it revealed the predominance of activities carried out in the steps before the visit to the museum and emphasized the lack of activities carried out in the museum and on returning to school after the visit. These results allow us to better outline the objectives and needs to be met in the initial and continuous training courses for teachers and museum educators, aiming at the best use of this resource for student learning. The SVAF is a framework capable of to identify and classify the teachers’ practices, since the instruments it integrates provided important and detailed information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Science Teacher Education\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"329 - 351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Science Teacher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2022.2103010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science Teacher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2022.2103010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要学校参观科学博物馆是公认的教育资源,如果老师有意计划的话,它可以为学生提供独特的学习体验。令人惊讶的是,在没有研究人员干预的情况下,通过系统监测来分析教师所采取的做法的调查在文献中几乎不存在。我们开发了学校访问衔接框架(SVAF),以识别和分类(通过等级量表)学校访问规划实践。主要目标是从阐明的角度来描述教师的实践,然后可以定义正规教育和非正规教育的背景。在这篇文章中,我们描述了我们如何将SVAF应用于五个案例研究,这些案例研究被配置为学校参观科学博物馆,同时我们测试了框架的效率。根据该领域的文献,从SVAF的角度对访问计划进行分析,使我们能够确定教师的实践没有达到预期的时刻。同样,它揭示了在参观博物馆之前的步骤中开展的活动占主导地位,并强调在博物馆和参观结束后返回学校时缺乏开展的活动。这些结果使我们能够更好地概述教师和博物馆教育工作者的初始和持续培训课程中需要满足的目标和需求,旨在最大限度地利用这一资源进行学生学习。SVAF是一个能够识别和分类教师实践的框架,因为它集成的工具提供了重要而详细的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
School Visits to Science Museums: A Framework for Analyzing Teacher Practices
ABSTRACT School visits to science museums are recognized educational resources that provide students with unique learning experiences, if teachers intentionally plan these. Surprisingly one finds that investigations analyzing teachers adopted practices by systematic monitoring, without researcher intervention, are almost non-existent in the literature. We developed the School Visits Articulated Framework (SVAF) to identify and classify (through levels’ scale) the school visits planning practices. The mainly objective was to reach a characterization of teachers’ practices in a perspective of articulations formal education and non-formal education contexts may then be defined. In this article, we describe how we applied the SVAF on five case studies configured as school visits to a science museum, simultaneously we test the framework efficiency. The analysis of the visit plan from the perspective of the SVAF allowed us to identify moments in which the teachers’ practices did not meet expectations according to the literature in the area. Likewise, it revealed the predominance of activities carried out in the steps before the visit to the museum and emphasized the lack of activities carried out in the museum and on returning to school after the visit. These results allow us to better outline the objectives and needs to be met in the initial and continuous training courses for teachers and museum educators, aiming at the best use of this resource for student learning. The SVAF is a framework capable of to identify and classify the teachers’ practices, since the instruments it integrates provided important and detailed information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Science Teacher Education
Journal of Science Teacher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Journal of Science Teacher Education (JSTE) is the flagship journal of the Association for Science Teacher Education. It serves as a forum for disseminating high quality research and theoretical position papers concerning preservice and inservice education of science teachers. The Journal features pragmatic articles that offer ways to improve classroom teaching and learning, professional development, and teacher recruitment and retention at pre K-16 levels.
期刊最新文献
Where’s the Peanut Butter? Journaling about Science Practices in Everyday Life Integrating Text Structure Instruction in Science Education: A Design-Based Study What Makes this Lesson Engineering? What Makes it Science? Examining the Thought Processes of Pre-Service Elementary Teachers Science Teacher Action Research in Top Tier Science Education Journals: A Review of the Literature Integrated Language and Science & Technology Instruction: A Cognitive Task Analysis of the Required Teacher Expertise
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1