德国能源转型和气候政策背景下的抗议和两极分化:心态和集体认同

IF 1.9 3区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE German Politics Pub Date : 2022-04-10 DOI:10.1080/09644008.2022.2059469
J. Zilles, Stine Marg
{"title":"德国能源转型和气候政策背景下的抗议和两极分化:心态和集体认同","authors":"J. Zilles, Stine Marg","doi":"10.1080/09644008.2022.2059469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The policy field of energy and climate policy has been shaped by a profound polarisation in recent years. On the one hand, young people in urban centres across Germany and beyond are protesting in the streets, demanding more effective political action and greater responsibility regarding climate change. On the other hand, citizens in rural areas are increasingly rejecting specific projects to implement the energy transition. These distinct poles are diametrically opposed and form clusters of people sharing the same mindsets regarding the issue of climate and energy policy. We conduct a qualitative analysis to describe these shared mindsets and collective identities of these clusters and their specific conceptualisation of the ‘others’. Although the shared mindsets of the clusters are distinct, some narratives overlap, e.g. the ambition to serve the common good, the strong reliance on science and experts and the attachment to nature and the environment. Both poles recognise each other as their respective counterpart, but the external perception is mostly negative and distorted thus leading to additional tension. Finally, we conclude that it is worthwhile for future research to investigate if this polarisation integrates into existing cleavages or whether it should be discussed beyond this.","PeriodicalId":46640,"journal":{"name":"German Politics","volume":"32 1","pages":"495 - 516"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protest and Polarisation in the Context of Energy Transition and Climate Policy in Germany: Mindsets and Collective Identities\",\"authors\":\"J. Zilles, Stine Marg\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09644008.2022.2059469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The policy field of energy and climate policy has been shaped by a profound polarisation in recent years. On the one hand, young people in urban centres across Germany and beyond are protesting in the streets, demanding more effective political action and greater responsibility regarding climate change. On the other hand, citizens in rural areas are increasingly rejecting specific projects to implement the energy transition. These distinct poles are diametrically opposed and form clusters of people sharing the same mindsets regarding the issue of climate and energy policy. We conduct a qualitative analysis to describe these shared mindsets and collective identities of these clusters and their specific conceptualisation of the ‘others’. Although the shared mindsets of the clusters are distinct, some narratives overlap, e.g. the ambition to serve the common good, the strong reliance on science and experts and the attachment to nature and the environment. Both poles recognise each other as their respective counterpart, but the external perception is mostly negative and distorted thus leading to additional tension. Finally, we conclude that it is worthwhile for future research to investigate if this polarisation integrates into existing cleavages or whether it should be discussed beyond this.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"German Politics\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"495 - 516\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"German Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2022.2059469\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"German Politics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2022.2059469","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

近年来,能源和气候政策领域出现了深刻的两极分化。一方面,德国各地城市中心和其他地区的年轻人正在街头抗议,要求采取更有效的政治行动,对气候变化承担更大的责任。另一方面,农村地区的公民越来越多地拒绝实施能源转型的具体项目。这些截然不同的两极截然相反,形成了一群在气候和能源政策问题上有着相同心态的人。我们进行了定性分析,以描述这些集群的共同心态和集体身份,以及它们对“他人”的具体概念化。尽管集群的共同心态是不同的,但有些叙述是重叠的,例如为共同利益服务的雄心、对科学和专家的强烈依赖以及对自然和环境的依恋。两极都认为对方是各自的对手,但外部感知大多是负面的和扭曲的,从而导致额外的紧张。最后,我们得出结论,未来的研究值得调查这种两极分化是否与现有的解理相结合,或者是否应该对此进行讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Protest and Polarisation in the Context of Energy Transition and Climate Policy in Germany: Mindsets and Collective Identities
The policy field of energy and climate policy has been shaped by a profound polarisation in recent years. On the one hand, young people in urban centres across Germany and beyond are protesting in the streets, demanding more effective political action and greater responsibility regarding climate change. On the other hand, citizens in rural areas are increasingly rejecting specific projects to implement the energy transition. These distinct poles are diametrically opposed and form clusters of people sharing the same mindsets regarding the issue of climate and energy policy. We conduct a qualitative analysis to describe these shared mindsets and collective identities of these clusters and their specific conceptualisation of the ‘others’. Although the shared mindsets of the clusters are distinct, some narratives overlap, e.g. the ambition to serve the common good, the strong reliance on science and experts and the attachment to nature and the environment. Both poles recognise each other as their respective counterpart, but the external perception is mostly negative and distorted thus leading to additional tension. Finally, we conclude that it is worthwhile for future research to investigate if this polarisation integrates into existing cleavages or whether it should be discussed beyond this.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
German Politics
German Politics POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Against All Odds? A Discourse Network Analysis of the Political Debate About the German Passenger Car Toll Act German Legislators’ Conceptions of Democracy and Process Preferences: Results from a New Survey Germany’s Triangular Relations with the United States and China in the Era of the Zeitenwende The Effects of Federalism, Corporatism and Legislative Power on Health System Transformation in Germany Erythrocyte fatty acid aberrations in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Correlation with disease duration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1