住院病人睡眠和睡眠干扰因素的医护协议

Q1 Medicine Sleep Medicine: X Pub Date : 2022-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sleepx.2022.100047
Eva S. van den Ende , Pia Burger , Marjolein Keesenberg , Hanneke Merten , Reinoud J.B.J. Gemke , Prabath W.B. Nanayakkara
{"title":"住院病人睡眠和睡眠干扰因素的医护协议","authors":"Eva S. van den Ende ,&nbsp;Pia Burger ,&nbsp;Marjolein Keesenberg ,&nbsp;Hanneke Merten ,&nbsp;Reinoud J.B.J. Gemke ,&nbsp;Prabath W.B. Nanayakkara","doi":"10.1016/j.sleepx.2022.100047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Sleep is vital for recovery during hospital stay. Many sleep-promoting interventions have been investigated in the past. Nurses seem to overestimate their patients sleep and their perspective is needed for these interventions to be successfully implemented.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the patient's and nurse's agreement on the patient's sleep and factors disturbing sleep.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The instruments used included 1) five Richard-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) items plus a rating of nighttime noise and 2) the Consensus Sleep Diary (CSD). The mean of the five RCSQ items comprised a total score, which reflects sleep quality. Once a week, unannounced, nurses and patients were asked to fill in questionnaires concerning last night's sleep. Neither nurses nor patients knew the others' ratings. Patient-nurse agreement was evaluated by using median differences and Bland-Altman plots. Reliability was evaluated by using intraclass correlation coefficients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fifty-five paired patient-nurse assessments have been completed. For all RCSQ subitems, nurses' scores were higher (indicating “better” sleep) than patients’ scores, with a significantly higher rating for sleep depth (median [IQR], 70 [40] vs 50 [40], P = .012). The Bland-Altman plots for the RSCQ Total Score (r = 0.0593, P = .008) revealed a significant amount of variation (bias). The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) indicated poor reliability for all 7 measures (range −0.278 – 0.435). Nurses were relatively overestimating their own role in causing sleep disturbances and underestimating patient-related factors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Nurses tend to overestimate patients’ sleep quality as well as their own role in causing sleep disturbances.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37065,"journal":{"name":"Sleep Medicine: X","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100047"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590142722000064/pdfft?md5=b2581f051493608ce6a566e719e9ae97&pid=1-s2.0-S2590142722000064-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-nurse agreement on inpatient sleep and sleep disturbing factors\",\"authors\":\"Eva S. van den Ende ,&nbsp;Pia Burger ,&nbsp;Marjolein Keesenberg ,&nbsp;Hanneke Merten ,&nbsp;Reinoud J.B.J. Gemke ,&nbsp;Prabath W.B. Nanayakkara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sleepx.2022.100047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Sleep is vital for recovery during hospital stay. Many sleep-promoting interventions have been investigated in the past. Nurses seem to overestimate their patients sleep and their perspective is needed for these interventions to be successfully implemented.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To assess the patient's and nurse's agreement on the patient's sleep and factors disturbing sleep.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The instruments used included 1) five Richard-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) items plus a rating of nighttime noise and 2) the Consensus Sleep Diary (CSD). The mean of the five RCSQ items comprised a total score, which reflects sleep quality. Once a week, unannounced, nurses and patients were asked to fill in questionnaires concerning last night's sleep. Neither nurses nor patients knew the others' ratings. Patient-nurse agreement was evaluated by using median differences and Bland-Altman plots. Reliability was evaluated by using intraclass correlation coefficients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fifty-five paired patient-nurse assessments have been completed. For all RCSQ subitems, nurses' scores were higher (indicating “better” sleep) than patients’ scores, with a significantly higher rating for sleep depth (median [IQR], 70 [40] vs 50 [40], P = .012). The Bland-Altman plots for the RSCQ Total Score (r = 0.0593, P = .008) revealed a significant amount of variation (bias). The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) indicated poor reliability for all 7 measures (range −0.278 – 0.435). Nurses were relatively overestimating their own role in causing sleep disturbances and underestimating patient-related factors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Nurses tend to overestimate patients’ sleep quality as well as their own role in causing sleep disturbances.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep Medicine: X\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100047\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590142722000064/pdfft?md5=b2581f051493608ce6a566e719e9ae97&pid=1-s2.0-S2590142722000064-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep Medicine: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590142722000064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep Medicine: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590142722000064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:睡眠对住院期间的康复至关重要。过去已经研究了许多促进睡眠的干预措施。护士似乎高估了他们的病人的睡眠和他们的观点是需要这些干预措施的成功实施。目的了解患者与护士对患者睡眠及影响睡眠的因素的认同情况。方法使用的工具包括:(1)5个Richard-Campbell睡眠问卷(RCSQ)外加夜间噪音评分;(2)共识睡眠日记(CSD)。五个RCSQ项目的平均值构成了一个总分,反映了睡眠质量。每周有一次,没有事先通知,护士和病人被要求填写关于昨晚睡眠的问卷。护士和病人都不知道对方的评分。采用中位数差异和Bland-Altman图评估患者-护士协议。采用类内相关系数评价信度。结果共完成55例患者-护士配对评估。在所有RCSQ分项中,护士的得分均高于患者(表明睡眠“较好”),睡眠深度评分显著高于患者(中位数[IQR], 70[40]对50 [40],P = 0.012)。RSCQ总分的Bland-Altman图(r = 0.0593, P = 0.008)显示了显著的变异(偏差)。类内相关系数(ICC)表明所有7个测量值的可靠性都很差(范围为- 0.278 - 0.435)。护士相对高估了自己在引起睡眠障碍中的作用,而低估了患者相关因素。结论护士容易高估患者的睡眠质量以及自身在睡眠障碍中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient-nurse agreement on inpatient sleep and sleep disturbing factors

Background

Sleep is vital for recovery during hospital stay. Many sleep-promoting interventions have been investigated in the past. Nurses seem to overestimate their patients sleep and their perspective is needed for these interventions to be successfully implemented.

Objectives

To assess the patient's and nurse's agreement on the patient's sleep and factors disturbing sleep.

Methods

The instruments used included 1) five Richard-Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) items plus a rating of nighttime noise and 2) the Consensus Sleep Diary (CSD). The mean of the five RCSQ items comprised a total score, which reflects sleep quality. Once a week, unannounced, nurses and patients were asked to fill in questionnaires concerning last night's sleep. Neither nurses nor patients knew the others' ratings. Patient-nurse agreement was evaluated by using median differences and Bland-Altman plots. Reliability was evaluated by using intraclass correlation coefficients.

Results

Fifty-five paired patient-nurse assessments have been completed. For all RCSQ subitems, nurses' scores were higher (indicating “better” sleep) than patients’ scores, with a significantly higher rating for sleep depth (median [IQR], 70 [40] vs 50 [40], P = .012). The Bland-Altman plots for the RSCQ Total Score (r = 0.0593, P = .008) revealed a significant amount of variation (bias). The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) indicated poor reliability for all 7 measures (range −0.278 – 0.435). Nurses were relatively overestimating their own role in causing sleep disturbances and underestimating patient-related factors.

Conclusions

Nurses tend to overestimate patients’ sleep quality as well as their own role in causing sleep disturbances.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sleep Medicine: X
Sleep Medicine: X Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mind at rest, mind at risk: A prospective population-based study of sleep and subsequent mental disorders Determinants of variations in sleep patterns across Brazil: Exploring geographic influences Comparative efficacy of sodium oxybate versus placebo on improvement of nighttime sleep in adult patients with narcolepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis Erratum to “Sleep body position correlates with cognitive performance in middle-old obstructive sleep apnea subjects” [Sleep Med: X 4 (2022) 100050] Erratum to “The importance of sleep studies in improving the health indices of a nation” [Sleep Med: X 4 (2022) 100049]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1