两个测试的方法论-认识论框架,构建和调整测试,不可避免的参考,但不幸的是,很大程度上被忽视了。插图来自五家法国心理学杂志

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY Pratiques Psychologiques Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.prps.2021.01.001
N.E Boudouda , G. Broc , N. Calcagni , S. Ben Youssef , K. Gana
{"title":"两个测试的方法论-认识论框架,构建和调整测试,不可避免的参考,但不幸的是,很大程度上被忽视了。插图来自五家法国心理学杂志","authors":"N.E Boudouda ,&nbsp;G. Broc ,&nbsp;N. Calcagni ,&nbsp;S. Ben Youssef ,&nbsp;K. Gana","doi":"10.1016/j.prps.2021.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this article is to present two current methodo-epistemological frameworks for test and testing procedures, namely the Standards for Education and Psychological Testing (AERA, APA, NCME, 2014), and the ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (2017). These two frameworks were designed to serve as “universal” references shaping the construction and adaptation of psychological tests and scales. However, a review of articles published in five French journals shows that these two frameworks are largely ignored. Their dissemination could improve good practices in construction and cross-cultural adaptation of psychological tests and scales.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54590,"journal":{"name":"Pratiques Psychologiques","volume":"27 3","pages":"Pages 209-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.prps.2021.01.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deux cadres méthodo-épistémologiques du testing structurant la construction et l’adaptation de tests, références incontournables mais, hélas, largement ignorées. Illustration à partir de cinq revues françaises de psychologie\",\"authors\":\"N.E Boudouda ,&nbsp;G. Broc ,&nbsp;N. Calcagni ,&nbsp;S. Ben Youssef ,&nbsp;K. Gana\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prps.2021.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The purpose of this article is to present two current methodo-epistemological frameworks for test and testing procedures, namely the Standards for Education and Psychological Testing (AERA, APA, NCME, 2014), and the ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (2017). These two frameworks were designed to serve as “universal” references shaping the construction and adaptation of psychological tests and scales. However, a review of articles published in five French journals shows that these two frameworks are largely ignored. Their dissemination could improve good practices in construction and cross-cultural adaptation of psychological tests and scales.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pratiques Psychologiques\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 209-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.prps.2021.01.001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pratiques Psychologiques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1269176321000183\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pratiques Psychologiques","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1269176321000183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是介绍目前两种测试和测试程序的方法-认识论框架,即教育和心理测试标准(AERA, APA, NCME, 2014)和ITC翻译和改编测试指南(2017)。这两个框架旨在作为“通用”参考,塑造心理测试和量表的构建和适应。然而,对五家法国期刊上发表的文章的回顾表明,这两个框架在很大程度上被忽视了。它们的传播可以改进心理测试和量表在构建和跨文化适应方面的良好做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Deux cadres méthodo-épistémologiques du testing structurant la construction et l’adaptation de tests, références incontournables mais, hélas, largement ignorées. Illustration à partir de cinq revues françaises de psychologie

The purpose of this article is to present two current methodo-epistemological frameworks for test and testing procedures, namely the Standards for Education and Psychological Testing (AERA, APA, NCME, 2014), and the ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (2017). These two frameworks were designed to serve as “universal” references shaping the construction and adaptation of psychological tests and scales. However, a review of articles published in five French journals shows that these two frameworks are largely ignored. Their dissemination could improve good practices in construction and cross-cultural adaptation of psychological tests and scales.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: Pratiques psychologiques is an official publication of the ''Société française de psychologie''. It publishes thematic issues, and concentrates on the applications in the psychological practice. It covers all fields of psychology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board L’evidence-based practice en psychologie : une approche tripartite souvent mal comprise Difficultés et dispositifs d’aide en lecture à la fin du CP dans la cohorte ELFE. Quelques pistes de réflexion pour la pratique du psychologue de l’Éducation nationale Épidaure Market : développement d’un serious game sur l’alimentation durable, une intervention menée en milieu scolaire pour les collégiens Remerciements aux lecteurs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1