N.E Boudouda , G. Broc , N. Calcagni , S. Ben Youssef , K. Gana
{"title":"两个测试的方法论-认识论框架,构建和调整测试,不可避免的参考,但不幸的是,很大程度上被忽视了。插图来自五家法国心理学杂志","authors":"N.E Boudouda , G. Broc , N. Calcagni , S. Ben Youssef , K. Gana","doi":"10.1016/j.prps.2021.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this article is to present two current methodo-epistemological frameworks for test and testing procedures, namely the Standards for Education and Psychological Testing (AERA, APA, NCME, 2014), and the ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (2017). These two frameworks were designed to serve as “universal” references shaping the construction and adaptation of psychological tests and scales. However, a review of articles published in five French journals shows that these two frameworks are largely ignored. Their dissemination could improve good practices in construction and cross-cultural adaptation of psychological tests and scales.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54590,"journal":{"name":"Pratiques Psychologiques","volume":"27 3","pages":"Pages 209-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.prps.2021.01.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deux cadres méthodo-épistémologiques du testing structurant la construction et l’adaptation de tests, références incontournables mais, hélas, largement ignorées. Illustration à partir de cinq revues françaises de psychologie\",\"authors\":\"N.E Boudouda , G. Broc , N. Calcagni , S. Ben Youssef , K. Gana\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prps.2021.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The purpose of this article is to present two current methodo-epistemological frameworks for test and testing procedures, namely the Standards for Education and Psychological Testing (AERA, APA, NCME, 2014), and the ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (2017). These two frameworks were designed to serve as “universal” references shaping the construction and adaptation of psychological tests and scales. However, a review of articles published in five French journals shows that these two frameworks are largely ignored. Their dissemination could improve good practices in construction and cross-cultural adaptation of psychological tests and scales.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pratiques Psychologiques\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 209-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.prps.2021.01.001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pratiques Psychologiques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1269176321000183\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pratiques Psychologiques","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1269176321000183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Deux cadres méthodo-épistémologiques du testing structurant la construction et l’adaptation de tests, références incontournables mais, hélas, largement ignorées. Illustration à partir de cinq revues françaises de psychologie
The purpose of this article is to present two current methodo-epistemological frameworks for test and testing procedures, namely the Standards for Education and Psychological Testing (AERA, APA, NCME, 2014), and the ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (2017). These two frameworks were designed to serve as “universal” references shaping the construction and adaptation of psychological tests and scales. However, a review of articles published in five French journals shows that these two frameworks are largely ignored. Their dissemination could improve good practices in construction and cross-cultural adaptation of psychological tests and scales.
期刊介绍:
Pratiques psychologiques is an official publication of the ''Société française de psychologie''.
It publishes thematic issues, and concentrates on the applications in the psychological practice. It covers all fields of psychology.