Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne, Karletta Chief, Perry H Charley, Mae-Gilene Begay, Nathan Lothrop, Robert A Canales, Paloma I Beamer
{"title":"金矿山泄漏后基于社区的健康风险评估:金矿山泄漏Diné暴露项目的结果","authors":"Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne, Karletta Chief, Perry H Charley, Mae-Gilene Begay, Nathan Lothrop, Robert A Canales, Paloma I Beamer","doi":"10.1007/s12403-023-00583-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Gold King Mine Spill (GKMS) disaster resulted in three million gallons of acid mine drainage-containing arsenic and lead being released into a tributary of the San Juan River. The San Juan River flows through the Navajo Nation and the Diné (Navajo) rely on this river for a variety of purposes lending to unique exposure pathways. We administered questionnaires in three Navajo communities in collaboration with the Navajo Nation Community Health Representatives to obtain frequency and duration data on 43 activities (e.g., praying with river water, fishing from the river). These activities were utilized to conduct a community-based probabilistic risk assessment from exposure to arsenic (As) and lead at three different time points (i.e., pre-GKMS, peak-GKMS, and post-GKMS) for four different exposure scenarios: 1) recreational, 2) cultural, 3) dietary, and 4) aggregate. The aggregate scenario combines exposure from engaging in recreational, cultural, and dietary related activities. Utilizing the Lifeline Community-Based Assessment Software <sup>™</sup> distributions were incorporated for different exposure factors (e.g., hand-to-mouth contacts, transfer efficiency) along with Diné-specific activities (e.g., using the sediment as sunscreen) to estimate dose. The estimated lead and arsenic (As) hazard quotients (HQs) for the recreational, cultural, and dietary scenario for all time points were less than one, indicating no excess non-cancer risks. Only the dietary scenario resulted in an excess cancer risk, with less than 1% of the simulated estimates exceeding the 1 × 10<sup>-04</sup> cancer risk guideline from exposure to arsenic through the dietary scenario (e.g., consuming fish from the San Juan River) at all time points. This risk assessment is the first to incorporate the unique exposure pathways of the Diné people following the GKMS and highlights the need to incorporate community-specific pathways during the risk analysis process.</p>","PeriodicalId":12116,"journal":{"name":"Exposure and Health","volume":" ","pages":"643-660"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12536480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A community-based health risk assessment following the Gold King Mine Spill: Results from the Gold King Mine Spill Diné Exposure Project.\",\"authors\":\"Yoshira Ornelas Van Horne, Karletta Chief, Perry H Charley, Mae-Gilene Begay, Nathan Lothrop, Robert A Canales, Paloma I Beamer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12403-023-00583-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Gold King Mine Spill (GKMS) disaster resulted in three million gallons of acid mine drainage-containing arsenic and lead being released into a tributary of the San Juan River. The San Juan River flows through the Navajo Nation and the Diné (Navajo) rely on this river for a variety of purposes lending to unique exposure pathways. We administered questionnaires in three Navajo communities in collaboration with the Navajo Nation Community Health Representatives to obtain frequency and duration data on 43 activities (e.g., praying with river water, fishing from the river). These activities were utilized to conduct a community-based probabilistic risk assessment from exposure to arsenic (As) and lead at three different time points (i.e., pre-GKMS, peak-GKMS, and post-GKMS) for four different exposure scenarios: 1) recreational, 2) cultural, 3) dietary, and 4) aggregate. The aggregate scenario combines exposure from engaging in recreational, cultural, and dietary related activities. Utilizing the Lifeline Community-Based Assessment Software <sup>™</sup> distributions were incorporated for different exposure factors (e.g., hand-to-mouth contacts, transfer efficiency) along with Diné-specific activities (e.g., using the sediment as sunscreen) to estimate dose. The estimated lead and arsenic (As) hazard quotients (HQs) for the recreational, cultural, and dietary scenario for all time points were less than one, indicating no excess non-cancer risks. Only the dietary scenario resulted in an excess cancer risk, with less than 1% of the simulated estimates exceeding the 1 × 10<sup>-04</sup> cancer risk guideline from exposure to arsenic through the dietary scenario (e.g., consuming fish from the San Juan River) at all time points. This risk assessment is the first to incorporate the unique exposure pathways of the Diné people following the GKMS and highlights the need to incorporate community-specific pathways during the risk analysis process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exposure and Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"643-660\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12536480/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exposure and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-023-00583-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/6 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exposure and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-023-00583-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
金王矿泄漏(GKMS)灾难导致300万加仑含砷和铅的酸性矿井污水被排放到圣胡安河的一条支流中。圣胡安河(San Juan River)流经纳瓦霍部落(Navajo Nation),纳瓦霍人依靠这条河来实现各种目的,从而形成了独特的暴露路径。我们与纳瓦霍民族社区卫生代表合作,在三个纳瓦霍社区进行问卷调查,以获得43项活动(例如,用河水祈祷,从河里钓鱼)的频率和持续时间数据。利用这些活动开展基于社区的砷和铅暴露概率风险评估,在三个不同的时间点(即gkms前、gkms峰和gkms后)针对四种不同的暴露情景:1)娱乐、2)文化、3)饮食和4)聚集。总体情况包括参与娱乐、文化和饮食相关活动的暴露。利用生命线社区评估软件™,将不同暴露因素(例如,手-口接触,传递效率)的分布与din(或其他)特定活动(例如,使用沉积物作为防晒霜)相结合,以估计剂量。所有时间点的娱乐、文化和饮食情景的铅和砷(As)危害商(hq)估计值均小于1,表明没有过量的非癌症风险。只有饮食情景导致了过量的癌症风险,在所有时间点,只有不到1%的模拟估计值超过了通过饮食情景(例如,食用圣胡安河的鱼)暴露于砷的1 × 10-04癌症风险指南。这项风险评估首次纳入了遵循GKMS的din人的独特暴露途径,并强调了在风险分析过程中纳入社区特定途径的必要性。
A community-based health risk assessment following the Gold King Mine Spill: Results from the Gold King Mine Spill Diné Exposure Project.
The Gold King Mine Spill (GKMS) disaster resulted in three million gallons of acid mine drainage-containing arsenic and lead being released into a tributary of the San Juan River. The San Juan River flows through the Navajo Nation and the Diné (Navajo) rely on this river for a variety of purposes lending to unique exposure pathways. We administered questionnaires in three Navajo communities in collaboration with the Navajo Nation Community Health Representatives to obtain frequency and duration data on 43 activities (e.g., praying with river water, fishing from the river). These activities were utilized to conduct a community-based probabilistic risk assessment from exposure to arsenic (As) and lead at three different time points (i.e., pre-GKMS, peak-GKMS, and post-GKMS) for four different exposure scenarios: 1) recreational, 2) cultural, 3) dietary, and 4) aggregate. The aggregate scenario combines exposure from engaging in recreational, cultural, and dietary related activities. Utilizing the Lifeline Community-Based Assessment Software ™ distributions were incorporated for different exposure factors (e.g., hand-to-mouth contacts, transfer efficiency) along with Diné-specific activities (e.g., using the sediment as sunscreen) to estimate dose. The estimated lead and arsenic (As) hazard quotients (HQs) for the recreational, cultural, and dietary scenario for all time points were less than one, indicating no excess non-cancer risks. Only the dietary scenario resulted in an excess cancer risk, with less than 1% of the simulated estimates exceeding the 1 × 10-04 cancer risk guideline from exposure to arsenic through the dietary scenario (e.g., consuming fish from the San Juan River) at all time points. This risk assessment is the first to incorporate the unique exposure pathways of the Diné people following the GKMS and highlights the need to incorporate community-specific pathways during the risk analysis process.
期刊介绍:
It is a multidisciplinary journal focused on global human health consequences of exposure to water pollution in natural and engineered environments. The journal provides a unique platform for scientists in this field to exchange ideas and share information on research for the solution of health effects of exposure to water pollution.
Coverage encompasses Engineering sciences; Biogeochemical sciences; Health sciences; Exposure analysis and Epidemiology; Social sciences and public policy; Mathematical, numerical and statistical methods; Experimental, data collection and data analysis methods and more.
Research topics include local, regional and global water pollution, exposure and health problems; health risk analysis of water pollution, methods of quantification and analysis of risk under uncertainty; aquatic biogeochemical processes in natural and engineered systems and health effects; analysis of pollution, exposure and health data; and more.