承认基督教霸权比基督教特权更广泛:批判宗教学者对格兰泽的回应(2022)

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION Religion & Education Pub Date : 2022-10-02 DOI:10.1080/15507394.2022.2139996
Jenny L. Small, S. Edwards, Matthew Sayers, Renee L. Bowling, Julia R. Collett, Simran Kaur-Colbert, J. Nielsen
{"title":"承认基督教霸权比基督教特权更广泛:批判宗教学者对格兰泽的回应(2022)","authors":"Jenny L. Small, S. Edwards, Matthew Sayers, Renee L. Bowling, Julia R. Collett, Simran Kaur-Colbert, J. Nielsen","doi":"10.1080/15507394.2022.2139996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article, members of the Critical Religious Studies in Higher Education (CRSHE) network respond to Glanzer’s Recognizing Christian Complexity and Secular Privilege in Higher Education. We aim for the following goals: making explicit our fundamental assumption about Christian privilege and Christian hegemony, and their relationship to secular privilege; detailing our thinking about definitions, historical influences, social phenomena, and higher education practices related to critical theories of religion; and welcoming scholars from outside the CRSHE network into conversation about the topics of Christian privilege and critical theories of religion, so that we may, in community, move the theories forward.","PeriodicalId":43359,"journal":{"name":"Religion & Education","volume":"49 1","pages":"355 - 373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recognizing Christian Hegemony as Broader than Christian Privilege: Critical Religion Scholars Respond to Glanzer (2022)\",\"authors\":\"Jenny L. Small, S. Edwards, Matthew Sayers, Renee L. Bowling, Julia R. Collett, Simran Kaur-Colbert, J. Nielsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15507394.2022.2139996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this article, members of the Critical Religious Studies in Higher Education (CRSHE) network respond to Glanzer’s Recognizing Christian Complexity and Secular Privilege in Higher Education. We aim for the following goals: making explicit our fundamental assumption about Christian privilege and Christian hegemony, and their relationship to secular privilege; detailing our thinking about definitions, historical influences, social phenomena, and higher education practices related to critical theories of religion; and welcoming scholars from outside the CRSHE network into conversation about the topics of Christian privilege and critical theories of religion, so that we may, in community, move the theories forward.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Religion & Education\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"355 - 373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Religion & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2022.2139996\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2022.2139996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要在本文中,高等教育批判宗教研究(CRSHE)网络的成员回应了格兰泽对高等教育中基督教复杂性和世俗特权的认识。我们的目标是:明确我们对基督教特权和基督教霸权的基本假设,以及它们与世俗特权的关系;详细阐述了我们对宗教批判理论的定义、历史影响、社会现象和高等教育实践的思考;欢迎来自CRSHE网络之外的学者就基督教特权和宗教批判理论进行对话,以便我们在社区中推动这些理论的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recognizing Christian Hegemony as Broader than Christian Privilege: Critical Religion Scholars Respond to Glanzer (2022)
Abstract In this article, members of the Critical Religious Studies in Higher Education (CRSHE) network respond to Glanzer’s Recognizing Christian Complexity and Secular Privilege in Higher Education. We aim for the following goals: making explicit our fundamental assumption about Christian privilege and Christian hegemony, and their relationship to secular privilege; detailing our thinking about definitions, historical influences, social phenomena, and higher education practices related to critical theories of religion; and welcoming scholars from outside the CRSHE network into conversation about the topics of Christian privilege and critical theories of religion, so that we may, in community, move the theories forward.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
50 Years of Religion & Education: The Origins of the Journal and the Interdisciplinary Study of Religion and Education Religion, Education, and the Future of Democratic Pluralism Review: Spirituality That Makes a Difference, by Charles R. Kniker, Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2022; ISBN: 978-1-6667-1789-1 “One More Thing”: Clarifying the Evidence Around Christian Privilege in Higher Education Catholic and Public Schools Compared: Examining Achievement Growth in an Urban Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1