有酬就业法规导致大学和项目关闭吗?

IF 1.7 3区 教育学 Q2 ECONOMICS Education Finance and Policy Pub Date : 2021-02-11 DOI:10.1162/edfp_a_00340
Robert Kelchen, Zhuoyao Liu
{"title":"有酬就业法规导致大学和项目关闭吗?","authors":"Robert Kelchen, Zhuoyao Liu","doi":"10.1162/edfp_a_00340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract For decades, the federal government has expected vocationally focused programs in higher education, especially among for-profit colleges, to lead to gainful employment in a profession. In the mid-2010s, the U.S. Department of Education developed gainful employment (GE) regulations that sought to tie a program's federal financial aid eligibility to graduates’ debt-to-earnings ratios. We use a regression discontinuity design to examine whether for-profit programs’ performance on GE was associated with the likelihood of closing the program or college. Although the regulations were repealed before any program lost federal funding, we find that passing GE regulations was associated with a lower likelihood of program and college closures.","PeriodicalId":46870,"journal":{"name":"Education Finance and Policy","volume":"17 1","pages":"454-478"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Did Gainful Employment Regulations Result in College and Program Closures?\",\"authors\":\"Robert Kelchen, Zhuoyao Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/edfp_a_00340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract For decades, the federal government has expected vocationally focused programs in higher education, especially among for-profit colleges, to lead to gainful employment in a profession. In the mid-2010s, the U.S. Department of Education developed gainful employment (GE) regulations that sought to tie a program's federal financial aid eligibility to graduates’ debt-to-earnings ratios. We use a regression discontinuity design to examine whether for-profit programs’ performance on GE was associated with the likelihood of closing the program or college. Although the regulations were repealed before any program lost federal funding, we find that passing GE regulations was associated with a lower likelihood of program and college closures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education Finance and Policy\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"454-478\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education Finance and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00340\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Finance and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp_a_00340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

几十年来,联邦政府一直期望高等教育,特别是营利性大学的职业重点课程能够带来有收入的职业就业。在2010年代中期,美国教育部制定了有酬就业(GE)法规,试图将一个项目的联邦财政援助资格与毕业生的债务与收入比率联系起来。我们使用回归不连续设计来检验营利性项目在GE上的表现是否与关闭项目或大学的可能性有关。尽管这些法规在任何项目失去联邦资助之前就被废除了,但我们发现,通过通用电气法规与项目和大学关闭的可能性较低有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Did Gainful Employment Regulations Result in College and Program Closures?
Abstract For decades, the federal government has expected vocationally focused programs in higher education, especially among for-profit colleges, to lead to gainful employment in a profession. In the mid-2010s, the U.S. Department of Education developed gainful employment (GE) regulations that sought to tie a program's federal financial aid eligibility to graduates’ debt-to-earnings ratios. We use a regression discontinuity design to examine whether for-profit programs’ performance on GE was associated with the likelihood of closing the program or college. Although the regulations were repealed before any program lost federal funding, we find that passing GE regulations was associated with a lower likelihood of program and college closures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Making the (Letter) Grade: The Incentive Effects of Mandatory Pass/Fail Courses How Well Do Professional Reference Ratings Predict Teacher Performance? The Academic and Behavioral Impacts of an Autism Health Insurance Mandate: Evidence from Massachusetts A Bridge to Graduation: Post-Secondary Effects of an Alternative Pathway for Students Who Fail High School Exit Exams At What Cost? Is Technical Education Worth the Investment?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1