作为一个有机消费者的预算含义

Q2 Business, Management and Accounting Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing Pub Date : 2020-12-06 DOI:10.1080/08974438.2020.1846654
S. Denver, Jonas Nordström, T. Christensen
{"title":"作为一个有机消费者的预算含义","authors":"S. Denver, Jonas Nordström, T. Christensen","doi":"10.1080/08974438.2020.1846654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract It has repeatedly been shown that consumers consider the higher price of organic produce to be a barrier to buying organic food products. The present paper therefore asks whether organic consumption affects consumers’ actual total food expenditures. Food purchase data for a panel of Danish households during 2006–2014 were used to compare the total food expenditures of different organic household segments. A fixed effects model and a cross-section model both indicated that although food expenditures rose slightly with organic consumption, the increase was considerably less than had been suggested by organic price premiums at product level.","PeriodicalId":35464,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08974438.2020.1846654","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Budgetary Implications of Being an Organic Consumer\",\"authors\":\"S. Denver, Jonas Nordström, T. Christensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08974438.2020.1846654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract It has repeatedly been shown that consumers consider the higher price of organic produce to be a barrier to buying organic food products. The present paper therefore asks whether organic consumption affects consumers’ actual total food expenditures. Food purchase data for a panel of Danish households during 2006–2014 were used to compare the total food expenditures of different organic household segments. A fixed effects model and a cross-section model both indicated that although food expenditures rose slightly with organic consumption, the increase was considerably less than had been suggested by organic price premiums at product level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08974438.2020.1846654\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08974438.2020.1846654\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08974438.2020.1846654","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要一再表明,消费者认为有机产品的价格较高是购买有机食品的障碍。因此,本文询问有机消费是否会影响消费者的实际食品总支出。2006-2014年丹麦家庭的食品购买数据用于比较不同有机家庭的食品总支出。固定效应模型和横截面模型都表明,尽管食品支出随着有机消费略有增加,但增幅远小于产品层面有机价格溢价所表明的增幅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Budgetary Implications of Being an Organic Consumer
Abstract It has repeatedly been shown that consumers consider the higher price of organic produce to be a barrier to buying organic food products. The present paper therefore asks whether organic consumption affects consumers’ actual total food expenditures. Food purchase data for a panel of Danish households during 2006–2014 were used to compare the total food expenditures of different organic household segments. A fixed effects model and a cross-section model both indicated that although food expenditures rose slightly with organic consumption, the increase was considerably less than had been suggested by organic price premiums at product level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing
Journal of International Food and Agribusiness Marketing Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: The Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing is a timely journal that serves as a forum for the exchange and dissemination of food and agribusiness marketing knowledge and experiences on an international scale. Designed to study the characteristics and workings of food and agribusiness marketing systems around the world, the journal critically examines marketing issues in the total food business chain prevailing in different parts of the globe by using a systems and cross-cultural/national approach to explain the many facets of food marketing in a range of socioeconomic and political systems.
期刊最新文献
Consumption Trends and Perspectives for Milk and Dairy Products in Slovakia Consumers’ Perspectives Regarding the Nutraceutical Nature of Spirulina: Perceptions of the Nourishing-Naturalness and Tastiness Tablets Vs Flakes Do Consumer Values Affect the Effectiveness of Print Ads? An Experimental Study in Dairy Industry The Effect of Nutrition Label Type and Consumer Characteristics on the Identification of Healthy Foods in Finland Exploring the longevity of global foodservice brands; top CEO’s reveal how their companies have survived and thrived for over 50 years
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1