{"title":"Miles Vs Trane:Miles Davis和John Coltrane即兴创作风格的计算与统计比较","authors":"K. Frieler","doi":"10.1080/17494060.2020.1734053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Much has been written about John Coltrane and Miles Davis, from autobiographical works to detailed musicological analyses and cultural/sociological accounts of their lives, work, and legacy. Fewer publications are concerned with a direct comparison of both artists' approach to improvisation. I introduce a new analytical perspective, developed in the context of the Jazzomat Research Project, by using computational and statistical methods. Based on a large set of solo transcriptions taken from the Weimar Jazz Database spanning different stylistic phases for both artists (20 solos by Coltrane and 19 solos by Davis), I identify common and differing stylistic traits. This approach utilizes a set of 143 musical features extracted from the solos. Results indicate that both players differ in quite many aspects. Clichés of the “extroverted” style of Coltrane and the “introverted” style of Davis are evidenced by vastly different note densities and overall spacing of phrases. Some surprising and subtle differences also showed up. For instance, Davis has a tendency to avoid the third of the underlying chord and also major and minor third intervals, whereas Coltrane has a preference for playing out chords. Furthermore, both players seem to have no large overlap in their respective pattern vocabularies.","PeriodicalId":39826,"journal":{"name":"Jazz Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17494060.2020.1734053","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Miles Vs. Trane: Computational and Statistical Comparison of the Improvisatory Styles of Miles Davis and John Coltrane\",\"authors\":\"K. Frieler\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17494060.2020.1734053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Much has been written about John Coltrane and Miles Davis, from autobiographical works to detailed musicological analyses and cultural/sociological accounts of their lives, work, and legacy. Fewer publications are concerned with a direct comparison of both artists' approach to improvisation. I introduce a new analytical perspective, developed in the context of the Jazzomat Research Project, by using computational and statistical methods. Based on a large set of solo transcriptions taken from the Weimar Jazz Database spanning different stylistic phases for both artists (20 solos by Coltrane and 19 solos by Davis), I identify common and differing stylistic traits. This approach utilizes a set of 143 musical features extracted from the solos. Results indicate that both players differ in quite many aspects. Clichés of the “extroverted” style of Coltrane and the “introverted” style of Davis are evidenced by vastly different note densities and overall spacing of phrases. Some surprising and subtle differences also showed up. For instance, Davis has a tendency to avoid the third of the underlying chord and also major and minor third intervals, whereas Coltrane has a preference for playing out chords. Furthermore, both players seem to have no large overlap in their respective pattern vocabularies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jazz Perspectives\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17494060.2020.1734053\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jazz Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17494060.2020.1734053\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jazz Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17494060.2020.1734053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
关于约翰·科尔特兰和迈尔斯·戴维斯的著作很多,从自传到详细的音乐学分析,再到对他们的生活、工作和遗产的文化/社会学描述。很少有出版物直接比较两位艺术家的即兴创作方式。我介绍了一个新的分析视角,在Jazzomat研究项目的背景下,通过使用计算和统计方法。基于从魏玛爵士数据库(Weimar Jazz Database)中获取的大量独奏转录,涵盖了两位艺术家的不同风格阶段(Coltrane的20首独奏和Davis的19首独奏),我确定了共同和不同的风格特征。这种方法利用了从独奏中提取的143个音乐特征。结果表明,双方在很多方面存在差异。Coltrane的“外向”风格和Davis的“内向”风格的差异可以从音符密度和短语的整体间隔上得到证明。一些令人惊讶和微妙的差异也出现了。例如,戴维斯倾向于避免三度和弦以及大调和小调三度音程,而科尔特兰则倾向于演奏和弦。此外,这两个玩家在各自的模式词汇表中似乎没有太多的重叠。
Miles Vs. Trane: Computational and Statistical Comparison of the Improvisatory Styles of Miles Davis and John Coltrane
ABSTRACT Much has been written about John Coltrane and Miles Davis, from autobiographical works to detailed musicological analyses and cultural/sociological accounts of their lives, work, and legacy. Fewer publications are concerned with a direct comparison of both artists' approach to improvisation. I introduce a new analytical perspective, developed in the context of the Jazzomat Research Project, by using computational and statistical methods. Based on a large set of solo transcriptions taken from the Weimar Jazz Database spanning different stylistic phases for both artists (20 solos by Coltrane and 19 solos by Davis), I identify common and differing stylistic traits. This approach utilizes a set of 143 musical features extracted from the solos. Results indicate that both players differ in quite many aspects. Clichés of the “extroverted” style of Coltrane and the “introverted” style of Davis are evidenced by vastly different note densities and overall spacing of phrases. Some surprising and subtle differences also showed up. For instance, Davis has a tendency to avoid the third of the underlying chord and also major and minor third intervals, whereas Coltrane has a preference for playing out chords. Furthermore, both players seem to have no large overlap in their respective pattern vocabularies.