社论:非殖民化而非分散“欧洲”

J. Orbie, Anissa Bougrea, Antonio Salvador M. Alcazar III, Szilvia Nagy, Á. Oleart, Jonalyn C. Paz, Rahel W. Sebhatu, Tiffany G. Williams, I. Wodzka
{"title":"社论:非殖民化而非分散“欧洲”","authors":"J. Orbie, Anissa Bougrea, Antonio Salvador M. Alcazar III, Szilvia Nagy, Á. Oleart, Jonalyn C. Paz, Rahel W. Sebhatu, Tiffany G. Williams, I. Wodzka","doi":"10.54648/eerr2023001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Josep Borrell’s infamous 13 October 2022 speech, where he described the European Union (EU) in terms of a ‘garden’ versus the ‘jungle’ outside, has received an unprecedented amount of scrutiny. Yet the metaphor used by the HighRepresentative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and European Commission Vice-President in charge of ‘a stronger Europe in the world’was not new, nor was its underlying logic a surprise. Various analysts have pointed out the colonial tropes in European policymakers’ discourses over the past decades. In an influential essay that came out in 2000, Sir Robert Cooper, who would later also become an advisor to the Council of the EU, the European External Action Service, and the European Commission, pitched the ‘postmodern’ EU where the rule of law is reigning versus ‘premodern’ states where the ‘law of the jungle’ prevails. This illustrates how mainstream EU political discourse has been, and remains, highly colonial in the way in which relations between the EU and its presumed ‘others’ in world politics are conceived. More notable is the intensity of the debate and condemnation that Borrell’s speech has generated within policy and scholarly circles. This reflects a growing realization that the EU should be more modest about its so-called civilizational achievements and acknowledge the long and dark shadow of its colonial past. Against the background of clear challenges to (western) European dominance in the world system, critical observers are ardently questioning Europe’s alleged moral and sociopolitical superiority. Issues of racism within Europe have been increasingly discussed in the wake of ‘Black Lives Matter’ protests. Recent research has revealed","PeriodicalId":84710,"journal":{"name":"European foreign affairs review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial: Decolonizing Rather than Decentring ‘Europe’\",\"authors\":\"J. Orbie, Anissa Bougrea, Antonio Salvador M. Alcazar III, Szilvia Nagy, Á. Oleart, Jonalyn C. Paz, Rahel W. Sebhatu, Tiffany G. Williams, I. Wodzka\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/eerr2023001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Josep Borrell’s infamous 13 October 2022 speech, where he described the European Union (EU) in terms of a ‘garden’ versus the ‘jungle’ outside, has received an unprecedented amount of scrutiny. Yet the metaphor used by the HighRepresentative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and European Commission Vice-President in charge of ‘a stronger Europe in the world’was not new, nor was its underlying logic a surprise. Various analysts have pointed out the colonial tropes in European policymakers’ discourses over the past decades. In an influential essay that came out in 2000, Sir Robert Cooper, who would later also become an advisor to the Council of the EU, the European External Action Service, and the European Commission, pitched the ‘postmodern’ EU where the rule of law is reigning versus ‘premodern’ states where the ‘law of the jungle’ prevails. This illustrates how mainstream EU political discourse has been, and remains, highly colonial in the way in which relations between the EU and its presumed ‘others’ in world politics are conceived. More notable is the intensity of the debate and condemnation that Borrell’s speech has generated within policy and scholarly circles. This reflects a growing realization that the EU should be more modest about its so-called civilizational achievements and acknowledge the long and dark shadow of its colonial past. Against the background of clear challenges to (western) European dominance in the world system, critical observers are ardently questioning Europe’s alleged moral and sociopolitical superiority. Issues of racism within Europe have been increasingly discussed in the wake of ‘Black Lives Matter’ protests. Recent research has revealed\",\"PeriodicalId\":84710,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European foreign affairs review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European foreign affairs review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2023001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European foreign affairs review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2023001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

Josep Borrell在2022年10月13日发表的臭名昭著的演讲中,将欧盟(EU)描述为“花园”与“丛林”,这一演讲受到了前所未有的审视。然而,欧盟外交和安全政策高级代表兼欧盟委员会负责“世界上更强大的欧洲”的副主席所使用的比喻并不新鲜,其潜在的逻辑也并不令人惊讶。许多分析人士指出,在过去几十年里,欧洲政策制定者的话语中充斥着殖民主义色彩。在2000年发表的一篇有影响力的文章中,后来成为欧盟理事会、欧洲对外行动署和欧盟委员会顾问的罗伯特·库珀爵士,将法治主导的“后现代”欧盟与“弱肉强食”盛行的“前现代”欧盟进行了对比。这说明了欧盟主流政治话语是如何在欧盟和世界政治中假定的“其他国家”之间的关系中,以一种高度殖民的方式被构想出来的。更值得注意的是,博雷尔的演讲在政策和学术圈内引发了激烈的辩论和谴责。这反映出人们越来越意识到,欧盟应该对其所谓的文明成就更加谦虚,并承认其殖民历史的漫长而黑暗的阴影。在(西方)欧洲在世界体系中的主导地位明显受到挑战的背景下,批评人士正强烈质疑欧洲所谓的道德和社会政治优势。在“黑人的命也是命”抗议活动之后,欧洲内部的种族主义问题得到了越来越多的讨论。最近的研究表明
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editorial: Decolonizing Rather than Decentring ‘Europe’
Josep Borrell’s infamous 13 October 2022 speech, where he described the European Union (EU) in terms of a ‘garden’ versus the ‘jungle’ outside, has received an unprecedented amount of scrutiny. Yet the metaphor used by the HighRepresentative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and European Commission Vice-President in charge of ‘a stronger Europe in the world’was not new, nor was its underlying logic a surprise. Various analysts have pointed out the colonial tropes in European policymakers’ discourses over the past decades. In an influential essay that came out in 2000, Sir Robert Cooper, who would later also become an advisor to the Council of the EU, the European External Action Service, and the European Commission, pitched the ‘postmodern’ EU where the rule of law is reigning versus ‘premodern’ states where the ‘law of the jungle’ prevails. This illustrates how mainstream EU political discourse has been, and remains, highly colonial in the way in which relations between the EU and its presumed ‘others’ in world politics are conceived. More notable is the intensity of the debate and condemnation that Borrell’s speech has generated within policy and scholarly circles. This reflects a growing realization that the EU should be more modest about its so-called civilizational achievements and acknowledge the long and dark shadow of its colonial past. Against the background of clear challenges to (western) European dominance in the world system, critical observers are ardently questioning Europe’s alleged moral and sociopolitical superiority. Issues of racism within Europe have been increasingly discussed in the wake of ‘Black Lives Matter’ protests. Recent research has revealed
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Fast and Furious? A Quick Digest of a Plan for the Accelerated Integration of Candidate Countries into the EU The EU’s Vaccine Diplomacy in the WHO The Compatibility of the ISDS Mechanism under the Energy Charter Treaty With the Autonomy of the EU Legal Order European Defence Union ASAP: The Act in Support of Ammunition Production and the development of EU defence capabilities in response to the war in Ukraine Who is really affected by European Union terrorist sanctions? A Critical Study on ‘Proximity’ in EU Case Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1