基因编辑:伦理和法律挑战

Q2 Arts and Humanities Medicina e Morale Pub Date : 2023-04-11 DOI:10.4081/mem.2023.1227
{"title":"基因编辑:伦理和法律挑战","authors":"","doi":"10.4081/mem.2023.1227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article focuses on gene-editing as a technology with unprecedented perspectives but also emerging ethical questions. The main general question is the urgency of the progress of science on the one hand and the responsibility of scientists with respect to the value of human life and fundamental human rights on the other. The article analyses the ethical discussion, considering the kind of intervention (on somatic line or on germ line) and purpose (preventivetherapeutic or enhancement), in the context of pluralistic debate. The author discusses the arguments in favor of the libertarians and utilitarians and the objections of the personalist perspective, and then analyses the Opinions of bioethics committee at national, European and international level.","PeriodicalId":36708,"journal":{"name":"Medicina e Morale","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gene-editing: ethical and legal challenges\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/mem.2023.1227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article focuses on gene-editing as a technology with unprecedented perspectives but also emerging ethical questions. The main general question is the urgency of the progress of science on the one hand and the responsibility of scientists with respect to the value of human life and fundamental human rights on the other. The article analyses the ethical discussion, considering the kind of intervention (on somatic line or on germ line) and purpose (preventivetherapeutic or enhancement), in the context of pluralistic debate. The author discusses the arguments in favor of the libertarians and utilitarians and the objections of the personalist perspective, and then analyses the Opinions of bioethics committee at national, European and international level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina e Morale\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina e Morale\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2023.1227\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina e Morale","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2023.1227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章关注的是基因编辑作为一项技术,它有着前所未有的视角,但也出现了伦理问题。主要的一般性问题一方面是科学进步的紧迫性,另一方面是科学家在人的生命价值和基本人权方面的责任。本文分析了在多元辩论的背景下进行的伦理讨论,考虑到干预的类型(体细胞系或生殖系)和目的(预防性治疗或增强)。本文论述了支持自由主义者和功利主义者的论点以及个人主义观点的反对意见,并分析了生物伦理委员会在国家、欧洲和国际层面的意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gene-editing: ethical and legal challenges
The article focuses on gene-editing as a technology with unprecedented perspectives but also emerging ethical questions. The main general question is the urgency of the progress of science on the one hand and the responsibility of scientists with respect to the value of human life and fundamental human rights on the other. The article analyses the ethical discussion, considering the kind of intervention (on somatic line or on germ line) and purpose (preventivetherapeutic or enhancement), in the context of pluralistic debate. The author discusses the arguments in favor of the libertarians and utilitarians and the objections of the personalist perspective, and then analyses the Opinions of bioethics committee at national, European and international level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina e Morale
Medicina e Morale Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Contragestation or hidden abortion Consent in the psychotherapy setting Protection of animal welfare and regulation of animal experimentation Antiandrogens in the treatment of violent sexual behavior: ethical reflections Continuing care unit: new therapeutic and care solution in terminal illness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1