{"title":"不确定时期扫盲研究的方法论要求与困惑","authors":"Claire Lee, Chris Bailey, C. Burnett, J. Rowsell","doi":"10.1080/09620214.2021.2008806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When we began the journey to edit this special issue on methodological imperatives and perplexities for literacy research in uncertain times, it was the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. At the time, we recognised that methodological approaches we held dear required rethinking, but we could not see far enough ahead to appreciate how profoundly methods and reflexivities would transform, shift, and even face a reckoning of sorts. Two years into the pandemic, it is clear now that comfortable research practices like ‘collecting data’ and ‘entering the field’ are not only unhelpful constructs but are also riddled with ethical perplexities. Haraway’s notion of ‘staying with the trouble’ (Haraway, 2016) may be helpful here in that, as literacy researchers, we need to stay with the trouble of the moment to recognise where it moves us and how we must change and shape our methodological orientations and practices around the contours of trouble, uncertainty, and reckonings. Sensitising ourselves to the reality that the world is not, cannot, should not be the same after George Floyd was murdered; after wildfires enveloped communities across the world; after the multitude of deaths due to Covid-19; and after governments have been toppled and threatened by insurgents. Given these changed and changing global circumstances, we need to interrogate and reimagine how we do literacy research, who we are as literacy researchers, and the role of literacy research in troubling how literacy is defined and understood, as well as its interface with precarity. These challenges – methodological and epistemological, but also ethical, emotional and deeply personal – lie at the heart of this special issue. The vivid instances of ethical moments set out within the articles we bring together in this special issue collectively signal ways that we as researchers must raise our heads above university and institutional parapets, to intensify our gaze onto ethical imperatives and think long and hard about contemporary research methods and methodologies. From the opening article, which explores the boundaries and processes of justice-oriented literacy research as a conduit to healing, the special issue moves through some of the healing work that needs to take place. The articles challenge us as researchers to interrogate the ways in which literacy practices – and, indeed, INTERNATIONAL STUDIES IN SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION 2022, VOL. 31, NOS. 1–2, 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2021.2008806","PeriodicalId":45706,"journal":{"name":"International Studies in Sociology of Education","volume":"31 1","pages":"1 - 4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodological imperatives and perplexities for literacy research in uncertain times\",\"authors\":\"Claire Lee, Chris Bailey, C. Burnett, J. Rowsell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09620214.2021.2008806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When we began the journey to edit this special issue on methodological imperatives and perplexities for literacy research in uncertain times, it was the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. At the time, we recognised that methodological approaches we held dear required rethinking, but we could not see far enough ahead to appreciate how profoundly methods and reflexivities would transform, shift, and even face a reckoning of sorts. Two years into the pandemic, it is clear now that comfortable research practices like ‘collecting data’ and ‘entering the field’ are not only unhelpful constructs but are also riddled with ethical perplexities. Haraway’s notion of ‘staying with the trouble’ (Haraway, 2016) may be helpful here in that, as literacy researchers, we need to stay with the trouble of the moment to recognise where it moves us and how we must change and shape our methodological orientations and practices around the contours of trouble, uncertainty, and reckonings. Sensitising ourselves to the reality that the world is not, cannot, should not be the same after George Floyd was murdered; after wildfires enveloped communities across the world; after the multitude of deaths due to Covid-19; and after governments have been toppled and threatened by insurgents. Given these changed and changing global circumstances, we need to interrogate and reimagine how we do literacy research, who we are as literacy researchers, and the role of literacy research in troubling how literacy is defined and understood, as well as its interface with precarity. These challenges – methodological and epistemological, but also ethical, emotional and deeply personal – lie at the heart of this special issue. The vivid instances of ethical moments set out within the articles we bring together in this special issue collectively signal ways that we as researchers must raise our heads above university and institutional parapets, to intensify our gaze onto ethical imperatives and think long and hard about contemporary research methods and methodologies. From the opening article, which explores the boundaries and processes of justice-oriented literacy research as a conduit to healing, the special issue moves through some of the healing work that needs to take place. The articles challenge us as researchers to interrogate the ways in which literacy practices – and, indeed, INTERNATIONAL STUDIES IN SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION 2022, VOL. 31, NOS. 1–2, 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2021.2008806\",\"PeriodicalId\":45706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Studies in Sociology of Education\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Studies in Sociology of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2021.2008806\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Studies in Sociology of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2021.2008806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
当我们开始编辑本期关于不确定时期扫盲研究的方法论必要性和困惑的特刊时,正值COVID-19大流行的早期。当时,我们认识到,我们所珍视的方法论方法需要重新思考,但我们无法看到足够远的未来,无法理解方法和反身性将如何深刻地转变、转变,甚至面临各种清算。大流行爆发两年后,现在很明显,“收集数据”和“进入研究领域”等舒适的研究实践不仅是无益的构想,而且充满了伦理困惑。Haraway的“与麻烦为伴”的概念(Haraway, 2016)在这里可能会有所帮助,因为作为扫盲研究人员,我们需要与当前的麻烦为伴,认识到它将我们推向何处,以及我们必须如何改变和塑造我们的方法论取向和实践,围绕麻烦、不确定性和估算的轮廓。让我们意识到,在乔治·弗洛伊德被谋杀后,这个世界已经、不可能、也不应该和以前一样了;野火笼罩了世界各地的社区;在Covid-19造成大量死亡之后;在政府被叛乱分子推翻和威胁之后。鉴于这些变化和不断变化的全球环境,我们需要询问和重新思考我们如何进行扫盲研究,我们作为扫盲研究人员是谁,扫盲研究在如何定义和理解扫盲方面的作用,以及它与不稳定的关系。这些挑战——方法论的和认识论的,还有伦理的、情感的和深刻的个人的——是这个特殊问题的核心。我们在本期特刊中汇集的文章中列出的道德时刻的生动例子,共同表明我们作为研究人员必须从大学和机构的围墙上抬起头来,加强对道德要求的关注,并对当代研究方法和方法进行长期而认真的思考。开篇文章探讨了以正义为导向的扫盲研究作为一种治愈途径的界限和过程,从这篇文章开始,本期特刊探讨了一些需要进行的治愈工作。这些文章挑战我们作为研究人员来询问识字实践的方式-事实上,教育社会学的国际研究2022,VOL. 31, no .1 - 2,1 - 4 https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2021.2008806
Methodological imperatives and perplexities for literacy research in uncertain times
When we began the journey to edit this special issue on methodological imperatives and perplexities for literacy research in uncertain times, it was the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic. At the time, we recognised that methodological approaches we held dear required rethinking, but we could not see far enough ahead to appreciate how profoundly methods and reflexivities would transform, shift, and even face a reckoning of sorts. Two years into the pandemic, it is clear now that comfortable research practices like ‘collecting data’ and ‘entering the field’ are not only unhelpful constructs but are also riddled with ethical perplexities. Haraway’s notion of ‘staying with the trouble’ (Haraway, 2016) may be helpful here in that, as literacy researchers, we need to stay with the trouble of the moment to recognise where it moves us and how we must change and shape our methodological orientations and practices around the contours of trouble, uncertainty, and reckonings. Sensitising ourselves to the reality that the world is not, cannot, should not be the same after George Floyd was murdered; after wildfires enveloped communities across the world; after the multitude of deaths due to Covid-19; and after governments have been toppled and threatened by insurgents. Given these changed and changing global circumstances, we need to interrogate and reimagine how we do literacy research, who we are as literacy researchers, and the role of literacy research in troubling how literacy is defined and understood, as well as its interface with precarity. These challenges – methodological and epistemological, but also ethical, emotional and deeply personal – lie at the heart of this special issue. The vivid instances of ethical moments set out within the articles we bring together in this special issue collectively signal ways that we as researchers must raise our heads above university and institutional parapets, to intensify our gaze onto ethical imperatives and think long and hard about contemporary research methods and methodologies. From the opening article, which explores the boundaries and processes of justice-oriented literacy research as a conduit to healing, the special issue moves through some of the healing work that needs to take place. The articles challenge us as researchers to interrogate the ways in which literacy practices – and, indeed, INTERNATIONAL STUDIES IN SOCIOLOGY OF EDUCATION 2022, VOL. 31, NOS. 1–2, 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1080/09620214.2021.2008806
期刊介绍:
International Studies in Sociology of Education is an international journal and publishes papers in the sociology of education which critically engage with theoretical and empirical issues, drawn from as wide a range of perspectives as possible. It aims to move debates forward. The journal is international in outlook and readership and receives papers from around the world. The journal publishes four issues a year; the first three are devoted to a particular theme while the fourth is an "open" issue.