消费者的错误和广告:抵押贷款再融资案例

IF 1.3 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Qme-Quantitative Marketing and Economics Pub Date : 2017-06-27 DOI:10.17016/FEDS.2017.067
Serafin Grundl, You Suk Kim
{"title":"消费者的错误和广告:抵押贷款再融资案例","authors":"Serafin Grundl, You Suk Kim","doi":"10.17016/FEDS.2017.067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Does advertising help consumers to find the products they need or push them to buy products they don’t need? In this paper we study the heterogeneous effects of advertising on consumer mistakes in the market for mortgage refinancing and quantify the resulting overall effect on the net present value of mortgage debt. Mortgage borrowers frequently make costly refinancing mistakes by either refinancing when they should wait, or by waiting when they should refinance. We assemble a novel data set that combines a borrower’s exposure to direct mail refinance advertising and their subsequent refinancing decisions. Even though borrowers would lose on average $1229 by refinancing, the average monthly exposure of 0.13 refinancing direct mail advertisements reduces the expected net present value of mortgage payments on average by $7 each month, because borrowers who should refinance are targeted by advertisers and more responsive to advertising. A counterfactual advertising policy that redirects all advertising to borrowers who should refinance would increase the gain in borrower welfare to $36.","PeriodicalId":46425,"journal":{"name":"Qme-Quantitative Marketing and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consumer mistakes and advertising: The case of mortgage refinancing\",\"authors\":\"Serafin Grundl, You Suk Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.17016/FEDS.2017.067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Does advertising help consumers to find the products they need or push them to buy products they don’t need? In this paper we study the heterogeneous effects of advertising on consumer mistakes in the market for mortgage refinancing and quantify the resulting overall effect on the net present value of mortgage debt. Mortgage borrowers frequently make costly refinancing mistakes by either refinancing when they should wait, or by waiting when they should refinance. We assemble a novel data set that combines a borrower’s exposure to direct mail refinance advertising and their subsequent refinancing decisions. Even though borrowers would lose on average $1229 by refinancing, the average monthly exposure of 0.13 refinancing direct mail advertisements reduces the expected net present value of mortgage payments on average by $7 each month, because borrowers who should refinance are targeted by advertisers and more responsive to advertising. A counterfactual advertising policy that redirects all advertising to borrowers who should refinance would increase the gain in borrower welfare to $36.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qme-Quantitative Marketing and Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qme-Quantitative Marketing and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2017.067\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qme-Quantitative Marketing and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2017.067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

广告是帮助消费者找到他们需要的产品,还是促使他们购买他们不需要的产品?在本文中,我们研究了广告对抵押贷款再融资市场中消费者错误的异质性影响,并量化了由此产生的对抵押贷款债务净现值的总体影响。抵押贷款借款人经常犯下代价高昂的再融资错误,要么在该等待的时候再融资,要么在应该再融资的时候等待。我们收集了一个新颖的数据集,将借款人对直接邮件再融资广告的敞口与其随后的再融资决策相结合。尽管借款人通过再融资平均会损失1229美元,但0.13个再融资直邮广告的平均每月风险敞口使抵押贷款付款的预期净现值平均每月减少7美元,因为应该再融资的借款人是广告商的目标,对广告的反应更高。一项反事实的广告政策将所有广告重定向给应该再融资的借款人,这将使借款人的福利收益增加到36美元。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consumer mistakes and advertising: The case of mortgage refinancing
Does advertising help consumers to find the products they need or push them to buy products they don’t need? In this paper we study the heterogeneous effects of advertising on consumer mistakes in the market for mortgage refinancing and quantify the resulting overall effect on the net present value of mortgage debt. Mortgage borrowers frequently make costly refinancing mistakes by either refinancing when they should wait, or by waiting when they should refinance. We assemble a novel data set that combines a borrower’s exposure to direct mail refinance advertising and their subsequent refinancing decisions. Even though borrowers would lose on average $1229 by refinancing, the average monthly exposure of 0.13 refinancing direct mail advertisements reduces the expected net present value of mortgage payments on average by $7 each month, because borrowers who should refinance are targeted by advertisers and more responsive to advertising. A counterfactual advertising policy that redirects all advertising to borrowers who should refinance would increase the gain in borrower welfare to $36.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Quantitative Marketing and Economics (QME) publishes research in the intersection of Marketing, Economics and Statistics. Our focus is on important applied problems of relevance to marketing using a quantitative approach. We define marketing broadly as the study of the interface between firms, competitors and consumers. This includes but is not limited to consumer preferences, consumer demand and decision-making, strategic interaction of firms, pricing, promotion, targeting, product design/positioning, and channel issues. We embrace a wide variety of research methods including applied economic theory, econometrics and statistical methods. Empirical research using primary, secondary or experimental data is also encouraged. Officially cited as: Quant Mark Econ
期刊最新文献
A high-performance turnkey system for customer lifetime value prediction in retail brands Is first- or third-party audience data more effective for reaching the ‘right’ customers? The case of IT decision-makers Counter-cyclical price promotion: Capturing seasonal changes in stockpiling and endogenous consumption From uniform to bespoke prices: Hotel pricing during EURO 2016 Price commitment and the strategic launch of a fighter brand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1