对斐济食糖生产商的援助增长可持续性如何?

IF 0.8 Q3 ECONOMICS New Zealand Economic Papers Pub Date : 2022-11-10 DOI:10.1080/00779954.2022.2138518
K. Anderson
{"title":"对斐济食糖生产商的援助增长可持续性如何?","authors":"K. Anderson","doi":"10.1080/00779954.2022.2138518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Following the loss of preferential access to the European Union’s previously highly protected sugar market, Fiji’s Government has been increasingly supporting its producers since 2010. That support is now much higher than most other countries’ assistance to the sugar sector. This study summarizes estimates of the changing extent of those transfers to producers from taxpayers and consumers. It does so by expressing them as nominal rates of assistance to producers and consumer tax equivalent rates (NRAs and CTEs). Those NRA and CTE estimates may well now exceed 100%. The level of support is around 5% of the government’s consolidated revenue. The nature of the support is not only economically inefficient and inequitable but also environmentally damaging and fiscally unsustainable given foreseeable market prospects. This suggests the need for that support to be re-purposed to provide better economic, social and environmental outcomes. Several suggestions as to how to do that conclude the paper.","PeriodicalId":38921,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand Economic Papers","volume":"57 1","pages":"114 - 118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How sustainable is the growth of assistance to Fijian sugar producers?\",\"authors\":\"K. Anderson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00779954.2022.2138518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Following the loss of preferential access to the European Union’s previously highly protected sugar market, Fiji’s Government has been increasingly supporting its producers since 2010. That support is now much higher than most other countries’ assistance to the sugar sector. This study summarizes estimates of the changing extent of those transfers to producers from taxpayers and consumers. It does so by expressing them as nominal rates of assistance to producers and consumer tax equivalent rates (NRAs and CTEs). Those NRA and CTE estimates may well now exceed 100%. The level of support is around 5% of the government’s consolidated revenue. The nature of the support is not only economically inefficient and inequitable but also environmentally damaging and fiscally unsustainable given foreseeable market prospects. This suggests the need for that support to be re-purposed to provide better economic, social and environmental outcomes. Several suggestions as to how to do that conclude the paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Zealand Economic Papers\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"114 - 118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Zealand Economic Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00779954.2022.2138518\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand Economic Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00779954.2022.2138518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在失去了对欧盟先前高度保护的食糖市场的优惠准入后,斐济政府自2010年以来一直在越来越多地支持其生产商。现在,这种支持远远高于大多数其他国家对糖业的援助。这项研究总结了对纳税人和消费者向生产者转移的变化程度的估计。它通过将其表示为对生产者的名义援助率和消费者税等值率(NRA和CTE)来实现这一点。NRA和CTE的估计值现在可能会超过100%。支持水平约为政府综合收入的5%。鉴于可预见的市场前景,这种支持的性质不仅在经济上效率低下和不公平,而且对环境造成破坏,在财政上不可持续。这表明有必要重新调整这种支持的目的,以提供更好的经济、社会和环境成果。关于如何做到这一点,本文提出了几点建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How sustainable is the growth of assistance to Fijian sugar producers?
ABSTRACT Following the loss of preferential access to the European Union’s previously highly protected sugar market, Fiji’s Government has been increasingly supporting its producers since 2010. That support is now much higher than most other countries’ assistance to the sugar sector. This study summarizes estimates of the changing extent of those transfers to producers from taxpayers and consumers. It does so by expressing them as nominal rates of assistance to producers and consumer tax equivalent rates (NRAs and CTEs). Those NRA and CTE estimates may well now exceed 100%. The level of support is around 5% of the government’s consolidated revenue. The nature of the support is not only economically inefficient and inequitable but also environmentally damaging and fiscally unsustainable given foreseeable market prospects. This suggests the need for that support to be re-purposed to provide better economic, social and environmental outcomes. Several suggestions as to how to do that conclude the paper.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
New Zealand Economic Papers
New Zealand Economic Papers Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Community-level ethnic diversity and community-level socio-economic development: evidence from 20 African countries The wage cost of a lack of access to affordable childcare in Aotearoa New Zealand Distinguished fellow lecture: monetary policy and the benefits and limits of central bank independence Differences between NZ and U.S. individual investor sentiment: more noise or more information? Citation for Bob Buckle to mark his Distinguished Fellow Award
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1