{"title":"性别与教育中的土著宇宙论与黑人本体认识论","authors":"Tuija Huuki, V. Pacini-Ketchabaw","doi":"10.1080/09540253.2023.2170334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This issue of Gender and Education explores the relationship of Indigenous and Black ontoepistemologies, cosmologies and practices to gender and education in the broadest sense. It serves as an instance of how to rethink the colonial underpinnings of our contemporary understandings of gender and education. It is not news that feminisms have been confined to colonial logics and settler colonialist ideals. As Shari Huhndorf and Cheryl Suzack (2010, 1) wrote more than a decade ago, ‘despite [important] interventions and the urgency of gender analysis specific to Indigenous communities, Indigenous women and feminist issues remain unexamined in contemporary feminist theory’. Black feminist writer bell hooks also warned long ago ‘that many women have appropriated feminism to serve their own ends, especially those white women who have been at the forefront of the movement’ (hooks 1981). Drawing on Indigenous feminist and gender theories and Black feminisms, this special issue is a crucial (yet minor) step towards decolonial and anticolonial knowledge production in gender and education. The collection of articles, taking seriously this journal’s feminist commitment, challenges the dominance of colonial thought practices in educational academic work. Without a doubt, the authors in this issue push the field of gender and education studies in unique directions, recognizing both the indebtedness of feminist research to Indigenous and Black onto-epistemologies, cosmologies and practices, as well as the knowledges from the margins that have been ‘developed, in a wide range of forms, over thousands of years, prior to and outside of the creation of universities’ (Coburn 2020, 430). As guest coeditors, we enter into this special issue from different locations and position (alitie)s. Veronica is a settler in (what is for now called) Canada; she grew up in Argentina under military coups, from which she inherited a process of whitening the nation state. Veronica’s work in early childhood education seeks to unsettle the violent colonial acts of child development always already embedded within pedagogy (e.g. Pacini-Ketchabaw and Montpetit 2019; Vintimilla and Pacini-Ketchabaw 2020). Tuija is a feminist Indigenous scholar coming from educational gender studies. Originally from a small village in the northernmost part of Finland, she is an Inari Sámi Indigenous person from a workingclass background. The strengths, positionalities and vulnerabilities of that mixture have","PeriodicalId":12486,"journal":{"name":"Gender and Education","volume":"35 1","pages":"119 - 128"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indigenous cosmologies and black onto-epistemologies in gender and education\",\"authors\":\"Tuija Huuki, V. Pacini-Ketchabaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09540253.2023.2170334\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This issue of Gender and Education explores the relationship of Indigenous and Black ontoepistemologies, cosmologies and practices to gender and education in the broadest sense. It serves as an instance of how to rethink the colonial underpinnings of our contemporary understandings of gender and education. It is not news that feminisms have been confined to colonial logics and settler colonialist ideals. As Shari Huhndorf and Cheryl Suzack (2010, 1) wrote more than a decade ago, ‘despite [important] interventions and the urgency of gender analysis specific to Indigenous communities, Indigenous women and feminist issues remain unexamined in contemporary feminist theory’. Black feminist writer bell hooks also warned long ago ‘that many women have appropriated feminism to serve their own ends, especially those white women who have been at the forefront of the movement’ (hooks 1981). Drawing on Indigenous feminist and gender theories and Black feminisms, this special issue is a crucial (yet minor) step towards decolonial and anticolonial knowledge production in gender and education. The collection of articles, taking seriously this journal’s feminist commitment, challenges the dominance of colonial thought practices in educational academic work. Without a doubt, the authors in this issue push the field of gender and education studies in unique directions, recognizing both the indebtedness of feminist research to Indigenous and Black onto-epistemologies, cosmologies and practices, as well as the knowledges from the margins that have been ‘developed, in a wide range of forms, over thousands of years, prior to and outside of the creation of universities’ (Coburn 2020, 430). As guest coeditors, we enter into this special issue from different locations and position (alitie)s. Veronica is a settler in (what is for now called) Canada; she grew up in Argentina under military coups, from which she inherited a process of whitening the nation state. Veronica’s work in early childhood education seeks to unsettle the violent colonial acts of child development always already embedded within pedagogy (e.g. Pacini-Ketchabaw and Montpetit 2019; Vintimilla and Pacini-Ketchabaw 2020). Tuija is a feminist Indigenous scholar coming from educational gender studies. Originally from a small village in the northernmost part of Finland, she is an Inari Sámi Indigenous person from a workingclass background. The strengths, positionalities and vulnerabilities of that mixture have\",\"PeriodicalId\":12486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender and Education\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"119 - 128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2023.2170334\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender and Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2023.2170334","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Indigenous cosmologies and black onto-epistemologies in gender and education
This issue of Gender and Education explores the relationship of Indigenous and Black ontoepistemologies, cosmologies and practices to gender and education in the broadest sense. It serves as an instance of how to rethink the colonial underpinnings of our contemporary understandings of gender and education. It is not news that feminisms have been confined to colonial logics and settler colonialist ideals. As Shari Huhndorf and Cheryl Suzack (2010, 1) wrote more than a decade ago, ‘despite [important] interventions and the urgency of gender analysis specific to Indigenous communities, Indigenous women and feminist issues remain unexamined in contemporary feminist theory’. Black feminist writer bell hooks also warned long ago ‘that many women have appropriated feminism to serve their own ends, especially those white women who have been at the forefront of the movement’ (hooks 1981). Drawing on Indigenous feminist and gender theories and Black feminisms, this special issue is a crucial (yet minor) step towards decolonial and anticolonial knowledge production in gender and education. The collection of articles, taking seriously this journal’s feminist commitment, challenges the dominance of colonial thought practices in educational academic work. Without a doubt, the authors in this issue push the field of gender and education studies in unique directions, recognizing both the indebtedness of feminist research to Indigenous and Black onto-epistemologies, cosmologies and practices, as well as the knowledges from the margins that have been ‘developed, in a wide range of forms, over thousands of years, prior to and outside of the creation of universities’ (Coburn 2020, 430). As guest coeditors, we enter into this special issue from different locations and position (alitie)s. Veronica is a settler in (what is for now called) Canada; she grew up in Argentina under military coups, from which she inherited a process of whitening the nation state. Veronica’s work in early childhood education seeks to unsettle the violent colonial acts of child development always already embedded within pedagogy (e.g. Pacini-Ketchabaw and Montpetit 2019; Vintimilla and Pacini-Ketchabaw 2020). Tuija is a feminist Indigenous scholar coming from educational gender studies. Originally from a small village in the northernmost part of Finland, she is an Inari Sámi Indigenous person from a workingclass background. The strengths, positionalities and vulnerabilities of that mixture have
期刊介绍:
Gender and Education grew out of feminist politics and a social justice agenda and is committed to developing multi-disciplinary and critical discussions of gender and education. The journal is particularly interested in the place of gender in relation to other key differences and seeks to further feminist knowledge, philosophies, theory, action and debate. The Editors are actively committed to making the journal an interactive platform that includes global perspectives on education, gender and culture. Submissions to the journal should examine and theorize the interrelated experiences of gendered subjects including women, girls, men, boys, and gender-diverse individuals. Papers should consider how gender shapes and is shaped by other social, cultural, discursive, affective and material dimensions of difference. Gender and Education expects articles to engage in feminist debate, to draw upon a range of theoretical frameworks and to go beyond simple descriptions. Education is interpreted in a broad sense to cover both formal and informal aspects, including pre-school, primary, and secondary education; families and youth cultures inside and outside schools; adult, community, further and higher education; vocational education and training; media education; and parental education.