{"title":"新的黎明:最高法院维护教育中的宗教自由","authors":"C. Russo, William E. Thro","doi":"10.1080/15507394.2023.2169541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Near the end of its 2021–2022 term the Supreme Court ushered in a new dawn by upholding religious freedom in educational environments in two different types of disputes with far-reaching implications. In light of the Supreme Court decisions in Carson v. Makin and Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, this article reflects on their significance, the most important point of which is the latter’s having invalidated its longstanding measure for reviewing disputes under the First Amendment, the tripartite Lemon v. Kurtzman test as well as the endorsement test it enunciated in Lynch v. Donnelly for public schools.","PeriodicalId":43359,"journal":{"name":"Religion & Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Dawn: The Supreme Court Upholds Religious Liberty in Education\",\"authors\":\"C. Russo, William E. Thro\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15507394.2023.2169541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Near the end of its 2021–2022 term the Supreme Court ushered in a new dawn by upholding religious freedom in educational environments in two different types of disputes with far-reaching implications. In light of the Supreme Court decisions in Carson v. Makin and Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, this article reflects on their significance, the most important point of which is the latter’s having invalidated its longstanding measure for reviewing disputes under the First Amendment, the tripartite Lemon v. Kurtzman test as well as the endorsement test it enunciated in Lynch v. Donnelly for public schools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Religion & Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Religion & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2023.2169541\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion & Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15507394.2023.2169541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
A New Dawn: The Supreme Court Upholds Religious Liberty in Education
Abstract Near the end of its 2021–2022 term the Supreme Court ushered in a new dawn by upholding religious freedom in educational environments in two different types of disputes with far-reaching implications. In light of the Supreme Court decisions in Carson v. Makin and Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, this article reflects on their significance, the most important point of which is the latter’s having invalidated its longstanding measure for reviewing disputes under the First Amendment, the tripartite Lemon v. Kurtzman test as well as the endorsement test it enunciated in Lynch v. Donnelly for public schools.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
