弗拉姆海峡声学层析成像测量的距离和深度平均声速数据同化

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q2 ENGINEERING, OCEAN Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology Pub Date : 2023-07-07 DOI:10.1175/jtech-d-22-0132.1
F. Geyer, G. Gopalakrishnan, H. Sagen, B. Cornuelle, F. Challet, M. Mazloff
{"title":"弗拉姆海峡声学层析成像测量的距离和深度平均声速数据同化","authors":"F. Geyer, G. Gopalakrishnan, H. Sagen, B. Cornuelle, F. Challet, M. Mazloff","doi":"10.1175/jtech-d-22-0132.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe 2010-2012 Acoustic Technology for Observing the Interior of the Arctic Ocean (ACOBAR) experiment provided acoustic tomography data along three 167-301 km long sections in Fram Strait between Greenland and Spitsbergen. Ocean sound speed data were assimilated into a regional numerical ocean model using the Massachusetts Institute of Technology General Circulation Model-Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean four-dimensional variational (MITgcm-ECCO 4DVAR) assimilation system. The resulting state estimate matched the assimilated sound speed time series, the root mean squared (RMS) error of the sound speed estimate (~0.4 m s−1) is smaller than the uncertainty of the measurement (~0.8 m s−1). Data assimilation improved modeled range-and-depth-averaged ocean temperatures at the 78°50’N oceanographic mooring section in Fram Strait. The RMS error of the state estimate (0.21°C) is comparable to the uncertainty of the interpolated mooring section (0.23°C). Lack of depth information in the assimilated ocean sound speed measurements caused an increased temperature bias in the upper ocean (0-500 m). The correlations with the mooring section were not improved as short-term variations in the mooring measurements and the ocean state estimate do not always coincide in time. This is likely due to the small-scale eddying and non-linearity of the ocean circulation in Fram Strait. Furthermore, the horizontal resolution of the state estimate (4.5 km) is eddy-permitting, rather than eddy resolving. Thus, the state estimate cannot represent the full ocean dynamics of the region. This study is the first to demonstrate the usefulness of large-scale acoustic measurements for improving ocean state estimates at high latitudes.","PeriodicalId":15074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data assimilation of range-and-depth-averaged sound speed from acoustic tomography measurements in Fram Strait\",\"authors\":\"F. Geyer, G. Gopalakrishnan, H. Sagen, B. Cornuelle, F. Challet, M. Mazloff\",\"doi\":\"10.1175/jtech-d-22-0132.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe 2010-2012 Acoustic Technology for Observing the Interior of the Arctic Ocean (ACOBAR) experiment provided acoustic tomography data along three 167-301 km long sections in Fram Strait between Greenland and Spitsbergen. Ocean sound speed data were assimilated into a regional numerical ocean model using the Massachusetts Institute of Technology General Circulation Model-Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean four-dimensional variational (MITgcm-ECCO 4DVAR) assimilation system. The resulting state estimate matched the assimilated sound speed time series, the root mean squared (RMS) error of the sound speed estimate (~0.4 m s−1) is smaller than the uncertainty of the measurement (~0.8 m s−1). Data assimilation improved modeled range-and-depth-averaged ocean temperatures at the 78°50’N oceanographic mooring section in Fram Strait. The RMS error of the state estimate (0.21°C) is comparable to the uncertainty of the interpolated mooring section (0.23°C). Lack of depth information in the assimilated ocean sound speed measurements caused an increased temperature bias in the upper ocean (0-500 m). The correlations with the mooring section were not improved as short-term variations in the mooring measurements and the ocean state estimate do not always coincide in time. This is likely due to the small-scale eddying and non-linearity of the ocean circulation in Fram Strait. Furthermore, the horizontal resolution of the state estimate (4.5 km) is eddy-permitting, rather than eddy resolving. Thus, the state estimate cannot represent the full ocean dynamics of the region. This study is the first to demonstrate the usefulness of large-scale acoustic measurements for improving ocean state estimates at high latitudes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-22-0132.1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, OCEAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/jtech-d-22-0132.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, OCEAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2010-2012年北冰洋内部观测声学技术(ACOBAR)实验提供了格陵兰岛和斯匹次卑尔根岛之间的弗拉姆海峡三个167-301公里长的剖面的声学层析成像数据。利用麻省理工学院环流模式-估算海洋环流和气候四维变分(MITgcm-ECCO 4DVAR)同化系统,将海洋声速数据同化为区域数值海洋模式。所得状态估计与同化的声速时间序列相匹配,声速估计的均方根误差(~0.4 m s−1)小于测量的不确定度(~0.8 m s−1)。数据同化改善了Fram海峡78°50′n海洋系泊段的距离和深度平均海洋温度模型。状态估计的均方根误差(0.21°C)与内插系泊段的不确定性(0.23°C)相当。在同化的海洋声速测量中缺乏深度信息导致上层海洋(0-500 m)的温度偏差增加。由于系泊测量的短期变化和海洋状态估计并不总是在时间上一致,因此与系泊段的相关性没有得到改善。这可能是由于弗拉姆海峡的小尺度涡旋和海洋环流的非线性。此外,状态估计(4.5 km)的水平分辨率是允许涡流的,而不是涡流分辨率。因此,状态估计不能代表该地区的全部海洋动态。这项研究首次证明了大规模声学测量对改善高纬度地区海洋状态估计的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Data assimilation of range-and-depth-averaged sound speed from acoustic tomography measurements in Fram Strait
The 2010-2012 Acoustic Technology for Observing the Interior of the Arctic Ocean (ACOBAR) experiment provided acoustic tomography data along three 167-301 km long sections in Fram Strait between Greenland and Spitsbergen. Ocean sound speed data were assimilated into a regional numerical ocean model using the Massachusetts Institute of Technology General Circulation Model-Estimating the Circulation and Climate of the Ocean four-dimensional variational (MITgcm-ECCO 4DVAR) assimilation system. The resulting state estimate matched the assimilated sound speed time series, the root mean squared (RMS) error of the sound speed estimate (~0.4 m s−1) is smaller than the uncertainty of the measurement (~0.8 m s−1). Data assimilation improved modeled range-and-depth-averaged ocean temperatures at the 78°50’N oceanographic mooring section in Fram Strait. The RMS error of the state estimate (0.21°C) is comparable to the uncertainty of the interpolated mooring section (0.23°C). Lack of depth information in the assimilated ocean sound speed measurements caused an increased temperature bias in the upper ocean (0-500 m). The correlations with the mooring section were not improved as short-term variations in the mooring measurements and the ocean state estimate do not always coincide in time. This is likely due to the small-scale eddying and non-linearity of the ocean circulation in Fram Strait. Furthermore, the horizontal resolution of the state estimate (4.5 km) is eddy-permitting, rather than eddy resolving. Thus, the state estimate cannot represent the full ocean dynamics of the region. This study is the first to demonstrate the usefulness of large-scale acoustic measurements for improving ocean state estimates at high latitudes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
135
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology (JTECH) publishes research describing instrumentation and methods used in atmospheric and oceanic research, including remote sensing instruments; measurements, validation, and data analysis techniques from satellites, aircraft, balloons, and surface-based platforms; in situ instruments, measurements, and methods for data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation and assimilation in numerical models; and information systems and algorithms.
期刊最新文献
Synergistic retrievals of ice in high clouds from elastic backscatter lidar, Ku-band radar and submillimeter wave radiometer observations A Versatile Calibration Method for Rotary-Wing UAS as Wind Measurement Systems A Case of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension/Pseudotumor Cerebri Syndrome Cured by Myomectomy. Optimum Estimation of Coastal Currents Using Moving Vehicles Evaluation and Intercomparison of Small Uncrewed Aircraft Systems Used for Atmospheric Research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1