持续评估是否符合目的?分析南非一所科技大学学者的经验

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Education Inquiry Pub Date : 2021-10-29 DOI:10.1080/20004508.2021.1994687
A. Vahed, M. Walters, A. Ross
{"title":"持续评估是否符合目的?分析南非一所科技大学学者的经验","authors":"A. Vahed, M. Walters, A. Ross","doi":"10.1080/20004508.2021.1994687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Despite the expanding literature in the last three decades on modes of implementation and the various forms of formal and informal assessments, there is limited evidence of academics’ knowledge and understanding of continuous assessment practice. Using a mixed methods sequential explanatory research design, this paper aimed to investigate academics’ knowledge and understanding of the structure of continuous assessment and its application in supporting students’ learning experiences at a South African University of Technology. The results of this study provide the basis to initiate deeper discussions on developing shared understandings of assessment literacy, assessment bunching, and assessment validity and reliability. These elements are all required for the enhancement of quality assurance and monitoring of fit for purpose continuous assessment practices.","PeriodicalId":37203,"journal":{"name":"Education Inquiry","volume":"14 1","pages":"267 - 283"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous assessment fit for purpose? Analysing the experiences of academics from a South African university of technology\",\"authors\":\"A. Vahed, M. Walters, A. Ross\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20004508.2021.1994687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Despite the expanding literature in the last three decades on modes of implementation and the various forms of formal and informal assessments, there is limited evidence of academics’ knowledge and understanding of continuous assessment practice. Using a mixed methods sequential explanatory research design, this paper aimed to investigate academics’ knowledge and understanding of the structure of continuous assessment and its application in supporting students’ learning experiences at a South African University of Technology. The results of this study provide the basis to initiate deeper discussions on developing shared understandings of assessment literacy, assessment bunching, and assessment validity and reliability. These elements are all required for the enhancement of quality assurance and monitoring of fit for purpose continuous assessment practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education Inquiry\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"267 - 283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1994687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2021.1994687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要尽管在过去三十年中,关于实施模式以及各种形式的正式和非正式评估的文献不断增加,但关于学术界对持续评估实践的了解和理解的证据有限。本文采用混合方法顺序解释研究设计,旨在调查学术界对持续评估结构的知识和理解,以及它在支持南非理工大学学生学习体验中的应用。本研究的结果为深入讨论发展对评估素养、评估集群以及评估有效性和可靠性的共同理解提供了基础。这些要素都是加强质量保证和监测符合目的的持续评估实践所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Continuous assessment fit for purpose? Analysing the experiences of academics from a South African university of technology
ABSTRACT Despite the expanding literature in the last three decades on modes of implementation and the various forms of formal and informal assessments, there is limited evidence of academics’ knowledge and understanding of continuous assessment practice. Using a mixed methods sequential explanatory research design, this paper aimed to investigate academics’ knowledge and understanding of the structure of continuous assessment and its application in supporting students’ learning experiences at a South African University of Technology. The results of this study provide the basis to initiate deeper discussions on developing shared understandings of assessment literacy, assessment bunching, and assessment validity and reliability. These elements are all required for the enhancement of quality assurance and monitoring of fit for purpose continuous assessment practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Education Inquiry
Education Inquiry Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Transforming Nordic early childhood education and care in times of marketisation, privatisation and commercialisation Police education reform in Iceland: examining the legitimating principles, contradictions, and tensions in policy discourse Describing teacher educators’ metatalk moves enacted for teaching how to teach concepts Newly qualified secondary school teachers’ perspectives on workplace learning Status beliefs negatively affect expected university attainment of lower class students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1