埃塞俄比亚获得基本水、环境卫生和个人卫生设施的情况及相关因素:来自人口统计和健康调查的证据

IF 1.6 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 WATER RESOURCES Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.2166/washdev.2022.226
Belay Desye, A. Keleb, Leykun Berhanu, Ahemed Mohammed Ebrahim, Tarikuwa Natnael, Birhanu Wagaye, Zenawi Hagos Gufue, Metadel Adane
{"title":"埃塞俄比亚获得基本水、环境卫生和个人卫生设施的情况及相关因素:来自人口统计和健康调查的证据","authors":"Belay Desye, A. Keleb, Leykun Berhanu, Ahemed Mohammed Ebrahim, Tarikuwa Natnael, Birhanu Wagaye, Zenawi Hagos Gufue, Metadel Adane","doi":"10.2166/washdev.2022.226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In low- and middle-income countries, ensuring water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) facilities for households remains a major public health concern. Therefore, this study aimed to assess households’ access to WASH services and associated factors in Ethiopia. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 16,650 and 8,663 households in the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey (EDHS) and 2019 Mini-EDHS, respectively. The households were selected using a stratified two-stage cluster sampling technique. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with basic WASH services. Households’ access to basic water services was 65.2% (95% CI: 64.5–65.9%) and 68.7% (95% CI: 68.01–69.4%) in the 2016 EDHS and 2019 Mini-EDHS, respectively. Only 25.9% (95% CI: 25.2–26.62%) in the 2016 EDHS and 27.5% (95% CI: 26.34–28.3%) in the 2019 Mini-EDHS households had access to basic sanitation services. Moreover, only 38% (95% CI: 37.25–38.8%) of households had access to basic hygiene services in the 2016 EDHS. Female-headed households, urban residents, having education, family members ≥7, presence of soaps or detergents, and having a better wealth index were the most likely to have access to basic WASH services. The findings in general suggest the need for effective WASH interventions.","PeriodicalId":48893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access to basic water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) facilities and associated factors in Ethiopia: evidence from demographics and health surveys\",\"authors\":\"Belay Desye, A. Keleb, Leykun Berhanu, Ahemed Mohammed Ebrahim, Tarikuwa Natnael, Birhanu Wagaye, Zenawi Hagos Gufue, Metadel Adane\",\"doi\":\"10.2166/washdev.2022.226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In low- and middle-income countries, ensuring water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) facilities for households remains a major public health concern. Therefore, this study aimed to assess households’ access to WASH services and associated factors in Ethiopia. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 16,650 and 8,663 households in the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey (EDHS) and 2019 Mini-EDHS, respectively. The households were selected using a stratified two-stage cluster sampling technique. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with basic WASH services. Households’ access to basic water services was 65.2% (95% CI: 64.5–65.9%) and 68.7% (95% CI: 68.01–69.4%) in the 2016 EDHS and 2019 Mini-EDHS, respectively. Only 25.9% (95% CI: 25.2–26.62%) in the 2016 EDHS and 27.5% (95% CI: 26.34–28.3%) in the 2019 Mini-EDHS households had access to basic sanitation services. Moreover, only 38% (95% CI: 37.25–38.8%) of households had access to basic hygiene services in the 2016 EDHS. Female-headed households, urban residents, having education, family members ≥7, presence of soaps or detergents, and having a better wealth index were the most likely to have access to basic WASH services. The findings in general suggest the need for effective WASH interventions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2022.226\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"WATER RESOURCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2022.226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在中低收入国家,确保家庭用水、环境卫生和个人卫生设施仍然是一个主要的公共卫生问题。因此,本研究旨在评估埃塞俄比亚家庭获得讲卫生服务的情况及相关因素。在2016年埃塞俄比亚人口健康调查(EDHS)和2019年小型EDHS中,分别对16650户和8663户家庭进行了横断面研究。这些家庭采用分层两阶段整群抽样技术进行选择。进行了多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定与基本讲卫生服务相关的因素。在2016年EDHS和2019年Mini-EDHS中,家庭获得基本供水服务的比例分别为65.2%(95%CI:64.5-65.9%)和68.7%(95%CI:68.01-69.4%)。在2016年的EDHS中,只有25.9%(95%CI:25.2-26.62%)和2019年的Mini-EDHS家庭中,只有27.5%(95%CI:26.34-28.3%)能够获得基本的卫生服务。此外,在2016年EDHS中,只有38%(95%置信区间:37.25-38.8%)的家庭能够获得基本卫生服务。女性户主家庭、城市居民、受过教育、家庭成员≥7岁、有肥皂或洗涤剂、财富指数较高的人最有可能获得基本的讲卫生服务。调查结果总体上表明,有必要采取有效的讲卫生运动干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Access to basic water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) facilities and associated factors in Ethiopia: evidence from demographics and health surveys
In low- and middle-income countries, ensuring water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) facilities for households remains a major public health concern. Therefore, this study aimed to assess households’ access to WASH services and associated factors in Ethiopia. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 16,650 and 8,663 households in the 2016 Ethiopian Demographic Health Survey (EDHS) and 2019 Mini-EDHS, respectively. The households were selected using a stratified two-stage cluster sampling technique. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with basic WASH services. Households’ access to basic water services was 65.2% (95% CI: 64.5–65.9%) and 68.7% (95% CI: 68.01–69.4%) in the 2016 EDHS and 2019 Mini-EDHS, respectively. Only 25.9% (95% CI: 25.2–26.62%) in the 2016 EDHS and 27.5% (95% CI: 26.34–28.3%) in the 2019 Mini-EDHS households had access to basic sanitation services. Moreover, only 38% (95% CI: 37.25–38.8%) of households had access to basic hygiene services in the 2016 EDHS. Female-headed households, urban residents, having education, family members ≥7, presence of soaps or detergents, and having a better wealth index were the most likely to have access to basic WASH services. The findings in general suggest the need for effective WASH interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the dissemination of high-quality information on the science, policy and practice of drinking-water supply, sanitation and hygiene at local, national and international levels.
期刊最新文献
Socioeconomic predictors of access to improved water sources, sanitation facilities, and household water treatment in Nigeria WASH practices increased the prevalence of malnutrition among under-five children (6–59 months) in an urban slum area in Ibadan, Nigeria Enhancing rural drinking water safety using a Mg–Al-type layered double hydroxide foil as a new point-of-use disinfection tool Occurrence of Acanthamoeba spp. in a major river in the Philippines: impact on water quality and health WASH FIT implementation in Rohingya camps in Cox's Bazar Bangladesh – results after 1 year
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1