地方政府财政缺口对公私伙伴关系的影响:政府需求和私营部门风险规避

IF 2.3 3区 管理学 Q2 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION International Public Management Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-15 DOI:10.1080/10967494.2022.2119316
Min Xiong, Shaoming Cheng, H. Guo, J. Zhao
{"title":"地方政府财政缺口对公私伙伴关系的影响:政府需求和私营部门风险规避","authors":"Min Xiong, Shaoming Cheng, H. Guo, J. Zhao","doi":"10.1080/10967494.2022.2119316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract While government fiscal gap is traditionally considered a demand factor for the use of public-private partnerships (PPPs) to deliver public services, a high level of fiscal gap may signal elevated financial risks to private partners and deter them from entering into PPP agreements. A causal mediation analytic framework is used to delineate the two distinct causal pathways. We develop a conceptual model and test derived hypotheses with data of Chinese prefecture-level cities during 2015–2017. The findings suggest that government fiscal gap has a positive impact on PPP adoption, through the mediating role of the debt position. The fiscal gap, as a risk factor, is negatively associated with PPP participation. Risk aversion of the private sector manifests more conspicuously as smaller PPP investment amounts than as a lower likelihood of PPP participation. The adverse effects of the fiscal gap associated with financial risks may entirely offset any positive impact.","PeriodicalId":47671,"journal":{"name":"International Public Management Journal","volume":"26 1","pages":"589 - 608"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of local government fiscal gaps on public-private partnerships: government demand and private sector risk aversion\",\"authors\":\"Min Xiong, Shaoming Cheng, H. Guo, J. Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10967494.2022.2119316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract While government fiscal gap is traditionally considered a demand factor for the use of public-private partnerships (PPPs) to deliver public services, a high level of fiscal gap may signal elevated financial risks to private partners and deter them from entering into PPP agreements. A causal mediation analytic framework is used to delineate the two distinct causal pathways. We develop a conceptual model and test derived hypotheses with data of Chinese prefecture-level cities during 2015–2017. The findings suggest that government fiscal gap has a positive impact on PPP adoption, through the mediating role of the debt position. The fiscal gap, as a risk factor, is negatively associated with PPP participation. Risk aversion of the private sector manifests more conspicuously as smaller PPP investment amounts than as a lower likelihood of PPP participation. The adverse effects of the fiscal gap associated with financial risks may entirely offset any positive impact.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Public Management Journal\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"589 - 608\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Public Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2119316\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Public Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2022.2119316","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然政府财政缺口传统上被认为是使用公私合作伙伴关系(PPP)提供公共服务的需求因素,但高水平的财政缺口可能预示着私营合作伙伴面临更高的金融风险,并阻止他们加入PPP协议。因果中介分析框架被用来描述两种不同的因果途径。我们建立了一个概念模型,并使用2015-2017年中国地级市的数据对推导出的假设进行了检验。研究结果表明,政府财政缺口通过债务状况的中介作用,对购买力平价采用产生积极影响。财政缺口作为一个风险因素,与PPP参与呈负相关。私营部门的风险厌恶更明显地表现为较小的PPP投资金额,而不是较低的PPP参与可能性。与金融风险相关的财政缺口的不利影响可能完全抵消任何积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact of local government fiscal gaps on public-private partnerships: government demand and private sector risk aversion
Abstract While government fiscal gap is traditionally considered a demand factor for the use of public-private partnerships (PPPs) to deliver public services, a high level of fiscal gap may signal elevated financial risks to private partners and deter them from entering into PPP agreements. A causal mediation analytic framework is used to delineate the two distinct causal pathways. We develop a conceptual model and test derived hypotheses with data of Chinese prefecture-level cities during 2015–2017. The findings suggest that government fiscal gap has a positive impact on PPP adoption, through the mediating role of the debt position. The fiscal gap, as a risk factor, is negatively associated with PPP participation. Risk aversion of the private sector manifests more conspicuously as smaller PPP investment amounts than as a lower likelihood of PPP participation. The adverse effects of the fiscal gap associated with financial risks may entirely offset any positive impact.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: The International Public Management Journal (IPMJ) publishes high-quality empirical and theoretical work on managing large organizations, particularly public organizations. IPMJ features work from scholars around the world who conduct research in the areas of public management and government reform, comparative public administration, organizational theory, and organizational behavior. IPMJ seeks to provide a bridge between those conducting research on public management and public administration on the one hand, and those working in the areas of organizational behavior and organization theory on the other. IPMJ intends to stimulate and reflect the academic interests of an international constituency of readers and scholars.
期刊最新文献
It takes two to tango: concepts and evidence of further integration of public service motivation theory and self-determination theory Deliberative Democracy, Public Policy, and Local Government Public value and the digital economy Controversies in employee-driven innovation: Exploring the Danish public healthcare Transforming public and private sector organizations: Implementing sustainable purpose, traveling organization and connectivity for resilience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1