分析社会生活中情绪的后范式方法

IF 1.2 Q3 SOCIOLOGY Emotions and Society Pub Date : 2020-11-01 DOI:10.1332/263169020x15893854268688
R. Olson, Alberto Bellocchi, A. Dadich
{"title":"分析社会生活中情绪的后范式方法","authors":"R. Olson, Alberto Bellocchi, A. Dadich","doi":"10.1332/263169020x15893854268688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scholars studying emotions in social life typically work mono-logically, within a paradigmatic camp, drawing on distinct theories of emotion. In isolation, each offers a singular conceptualisation of emotions in social life. Working multi-logically, in contrast, offers richer, comparative\n insight into the layered meanings of emotion relevant to a social context. Rather than treating them as incommensurate, we not only argue for the benefits of drawing on multiple paradigms, methods and theories of emotions in social life, we offer a worked example of a post-paradigmatic methodology\n for analysing emotions in social life that values multi-logicality and epistemic flexibility. Setting aside debates about what emotions are, we work from the premise that different conceptualisations of emotions do things: shape what we see and ignore, and discursively position\n people. We show how multiple theories and concordant methods can – and should – be applied to studying emotions in social life in the same study. In this empirical illustration of a methodological innovation, we map theories and methodologies of emotions in social life against\n four research paradigms and against four phases of a study into the emotional dimensions of interprofessional practice, depicting the realisations afforded through a post-paradigmatic methodology for analysing emotions in social life.","PeriodicalId":29742,"journal":{"name":"Emotions and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A post-paradigmatic approach to analysing emotions in social life\",\"authors\":\"R. Olson, Alberto Bellocchi, A. Dadich\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/263169020x15893854268688\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scholars studying emotions in social life typically work mono-logically, within a paradigmatic camp, drawing on distinct theories of emotion. In isolation, each offers a singular conceptualisation of emotions in social life. Working multi-logically, in contrast, offers richer, comparative\\n insight into the layered meanings of emotion relevant to a social context. Rather than treating them as incommensurate, we not only argue for the benefits of drawing on multiple paradigms, methods and theories of emotions in social life, we offer a worked example of a post-paradigmatic methodology\\n for analysing emotions in social life that values multi-logicality and epistemic flexibility. Setting aside debates about what emotions are, we work from the premise that different conceptualisations of emotions do things: shape what we see and ignore, and discursively position\\n people. We show how multiple theories and concordant methods can – and should – be applied to studying emotions in social life in the same study. In this empirical illustration of a methodological innovation, we map theories and methodologies of emotions in social life against\\n four research paradigms and against four phases of a study into the emotional dimensions of interprofessional practice, depicting the realisations afforded through a post-paradigmatic methodology for analysing emotions in social life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29742,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emotions and Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emotions and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/263169020x15893854268688\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotions and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/263169020x15893854268688","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

研究社会生活中情绪的学者通常在一个范式阵营中,以不同的情绪理论为基础,进行单逻辑研究。在孤立的情况下,每一种都提供了社会生活中情感的独特概念。相反,多元逻辑的工作提供了对与社会背景相关的情感分层含义的更丰富、比较的见解。我们不仅主张借鉴社会生活中情感的多种范式、方法和理论的好处,而且还提供了一个后范式方法论的例子,用于分析社会生活中的情感,这种方法重视多逻辑性和认识灵活性。抛开关于情绪是什么的争论不谈,我们的工作前提是不同的情绪概念会起作用:塑造我们所看到和忽视的东西,并对人们进行话语定位。我们展示了在同一项研究中,如何将多种理论和协调的方法应用于研究社会生活中的情绪。在这一方法创新的实证说明中,我们将社会生活中情绪的理论和方法与四个研究范式和跨专业实践的情绪维度研究的四个阶段进行了对比,描绘了通过分析社会生活中情感的后范式方法论所提供的实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A post-paradigmatic approach to analysing emotions in social life
Scholars studying emotions in social life typically work mono-logically, within a paradigmatic camp, drawing on distinct theories of emotion. In isolation, each offers a singular conceptualisation of emotions in social life. Working multi-logically, in contrast, offers richer, comparative insight into the layered meanings of emotion relevant to a social context. Rather than treating them as incommensurate, we not only argue for the benefits of drawing on multiple paradigms, methods and theories of emotions in social life, we offer a worked example of a post-paradigmatic methodology for analysing emotions in social life that values multi-logicality and epistemic flexibility. Setting aside debates about what emotions are, we work from the premise that different conceptualisations of emotions do things: shape what we see and ignore, and discursively position people. We show how multiple theories and concordant methods can – and should – be applied to studying emotions in social life in the same study. In this empirical illustration of a methodological innovation, we map theories and methodologies of emotions in social life against four research paradigms and against four phases of a study into the emotional dimensions of interprofessional practice, depicting the realisations afforded through a post-paradigmatic methodology for analysing emotions in social life.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Courtroom Ethnography: Exploring Contemporary Approaches, Fieldwork and Challenges by Lisa Flower and Sarah Klosterkamp (eds) (2023) The politics of joy under semi-authoritarianism: the trajectory of joyous struggles in a protest cycle in Hong Kong Emotionalising hope in times of climate change Crisis and the Culture of Fear and Anxiety in Contemporary Europe by Carmen Zamorano Llena, Jonas Stier and Billy Gray (eds) (2024) ‘Where are you from?’ The affective and emotional dimensions of an ambiguous event of everyday racism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1