greenwashing word of mouth (GWWOM):对消费者的绿色行为有很大的影响

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT Journal of Global Responsibility Pub Date : 2022-06-29 DOI:10.1108/jgr-11-2021-0094
Navjit Singh, Kritika Gupta, Bharti Kapur
{"title":"greenwashing word of mouth (GWWOM):对消费者的绿色行为有很大的影响","authors":"Navjit Singh, Kritika Gupta, Bharti Kapur","doi":"10.1108/jgr-11-2021-0094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to examine the role of greenwashed word of mouth (GWWOM) originating from trickery and misleading green marketing practices on customer behavior. The outcomes of this study are expected to contribute in the domain of responsible green marketing. The significance of this study lies in its ability to provide useful recommendations to marketers, policymakers and customers toward accomplishment of sustainable development goals through usage and adoption of environment-friendly products.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis study is primarily descriptive in nature, as it attempted to investigate the implications of customers' reactions toward greenwashed practices prevailing in the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) market. The information gathered through a self-administered online questionnaire was analyzed using Smart PLS software package to verify the proposed hypotheses. The consistency and validity of the measurement and structural models proposed were tested using inferential statistical procedures.\n\n\nFindings\nThe results significantly confirmed the mediating role of GWWOM in shaping the relationship between green skepticism and shift in green behavior. It was verified from the results that customers’ futuristic behavioral patterns toward green products are negatively influenced by misleading and false claims of marketers through GWWOM communications.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe primary implications of this study are for marketers in understanding the role of GWWOM on organizations’ reputation. The policymakers may contribute by implementing appropriate changes in regulations to control greenwashed practices. Finally, customers may become more aware about the unethical marketing practices and act responsibly in the market place.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study revealed an intriguing finding in the sense that customers, who feel cheated by erroneous and mislead green claims of the marketers, are expected to communicate their experiences through variety of channels. Therefore, it is very likely that they may influence others to change their behaviors while going for environmentally safe products and may have significant consequences on the sustainable consumer behavior.\n","PeriodicalId":45268,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Responsibility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Greenwashed word of mouth (GWWOM): a vibrant influence on customer green behaviour\",\"authors\":\"Navjit Singh, Kritika Gupta, Bharti Kapur\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jgr-11-2021-0094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this study is to examine the role of greenwashed word of mouth (GWWOM) originating from trickery and misleading green marketing practices on customer behavior. The outcomes of this study are expected to contribute in the domain of responsible green marketing. The significance of this study lies in its ability to provide useful recommendations to marketers, policymakers and customers toward accomplishment of sustainable development goals through usage and adoption of environment-friendly products.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis study is primarily descriptive in nature, as it attempted to investigate the implications of customers' reactions toward greenwashed practices prevailing in the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) market. The information gathered through a self-administered online questionnaire was analyzed using Smart PLS software package to verify the proposed hypotheses. The consistency and validity of the measurement and structural models proposed were tested using inferential statistical procedures.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe results significantly confirmed the mediating role of GWWOM in shaping the relationship between green skepticism and shift in green behavior. It was verified from the results that customers’ futuristic behavioral patterns toward green products are negatively influenced by misleading and false claims of marketers through GWWOM communications.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe primary implications of this study are for marketers in understanding the role of GWWOM on organizations’ reputation. The policymakers may contribute by implementing appropriate changes in regulations to control greenwashed practices. Finally, customers may become more aware about the unethical marketing practices and act responsibly in the market place.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study revealed an intriguing finding in the sense that customers, who feel cheated by erroneous and mislead green claims of the marketers, are expected to communicate their experiences through variety of channels. Therefore, it is very likely that they may influence others to change their behaviors while going for environmentally safe products and may have significant consequences on the sustainable consumer behavior.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Global Responsibility\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Global Responsibility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-11-2021-0094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Responsibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jgr-11-2021-0094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本研究的目的是检验源自欺骗和误导性绿色营销实践的绿色口碑(GWWOM)对客户行为的影响。这项研究的结果有望为负责任的绿色营销领域做出贡献。这项研究的意义在于它能够为营销人员、政策制定者和客户提供有用的建议,通过使用和采用环保产品来实现可持续发展目标。设计/方法论/方法这项研究主要是描述性的,因为它试图调查消费者对快速消费品(FMCG)市场中普遍存在的环保做法的反应的影响。使用Smart PLS软件包对通过自行管理的在线问卷收集的信息进行分析,以验证所提出的假设。使用推断统计程序测试了所提出的测量和结构模型的一致性和有效性。研究结果显著证实了GWWOM在形成绿色怀疑论和绿色行为转变之间的关系中的中介作用。结果证实,消费者对绿色产品的未来行为模式受到营销人员通过GWWOM传播的误导和虚假声明的负面影响。实际含义本研究的主要含义是帮助营销人员理解GWWOM对组织声誉的作用。政策制定者可以通过实施适当的法规变更来控制“洗绿”行为。最后,客户可能会更加意识到不道德的营销行为,并在市场上负责任地行事。独创性/价值这项研究揭示了一个有趣的发现,即那些被营销人员错误和误导的绿色声明欺骗的客户,希望通过各种渠道交流他们的体验。因此,他们很可能会影响他人在购买环保产品的同时改变自己的行为,并可能对可持续的消费者行为产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Greenwashed word of mouth (GWWOM): a vibrant influence on customer green behaviour
Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the role of greenwashed word of mouth (GWWOM) originating from trickery and misleading green marketing practices on customer behavior. The outcomes of this study are expected to contribute in the domain of responsible green marketing. The significance of this study lies in its ability to provide useful recommendations to marketers, policymakers and customers toward accomplishment of sustainable development goals through usage and adoption of environment-friendly products. Design/methodology/approach This study is primarily descriptive in nature, as it attempted to investigate the implications of customers' reactions toward greenwashed practices prevailing in the fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) market. The information gathered through a self-administered online questionnaire was analyzed using Smart PLS software package to verify the proposed hypotheses. The consistency and validity of the measurement and structural models proposed were tested using inferential statistical procedures. Findings The results significantly confirmed the mediating role of GWWOM in shaping the relationship between green skepticism and shift in green behavior. It was verified from the results that customers’ futuristic behavioral patterns toward green products are negatively influenced by misleading and false claims of marketers through GWWOM communications. Practical implications The primary implications of this study are for marketers in understanding the role of GWWOM on organizations’ reputation. The policymakers may contribute by implementing appropriate changes in regulations to control greenwashed practices. Finally, customers may become more aware about the unethical marketing practices and act responsibly in the market place. Originality/value This study revealed an intriguing finding in the sense that customers, who feel cheated by erroneous and mislead green claims of the marketers, are expected to communicate their experiences through variety of channels. Therefore, it is very likely that they may influence others to change their behaviors while going for environmentally safe products and may have significant consequences on the sustainable consumer behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
18.80%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
Corporate social responsibility and gig worker commitment: empowerment and trust as mediators A concise autobiography of microfinancing: the pursuit of a world without poverty Sustainability in banking literature: review and synthesis of thematic structure Linking corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment: the role of employee job satisfaction Institutional pressure and responsible innovation: how big data analytics adoption drives manufacturing SMEs toward competitiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1