{"title":"将焦点转向严重认知障碍的评估:减少中风护理中的差异和不平等","authors":"Jennifer Stadden, A. Morrissey","doi":"10.1177/03080226231178109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"More than 100,000 strokes occur in the United Kingdom (UK) each year (Stroke Association, 2023). Decreasing stroke mortality rates have resulted in more people living with long-term disabilities, with approximately 50% of survivors demonstrating neurocognitive difficulties (Barbay et al., 2018). Cognitive impairment in the acute phase post stroke has been shown to impact participation in rehabilitation and increase the risk of poorer functional outcomes (D’Souza et al., 2021). Initial cognitive assessments play an important role in informing clinical reasoning for a person’s onward rehabilitation and care decisions; if an upward trajectory of improvement is demonstrated at an impairment and/or functional level, this further supports the need for referrals to inpatient specialist rehabilitation. Therefore, measuring their cognitive baseline following a stroke is pertinent to inform clinical decisions for professionals as well as advocate for patients where onward specialist rehabilitation is required to optimise their recovery. Completing cognitive assessment in the acute phase post stroke is recommended within national stroke guidelines (Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party, 2023) and these are routinely completed by occupational therapists (OTs) (Manee et al., 2020). For individuals with severe cognitive impairment following a stroke, they are highly unlikely to be able to engage in standardised assessments (Elliott et al., 2019), and functional cognitive assessments are recommended (Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party, 2023). OTs hold unique expertise in understanding occupation and the environmental impact on function. Through the utilisation of these specialist skills, we provide a vital contribution to cognitive assessments. Not only this, but we are skilled in implementing cognitive assessment results to support participation, choice and engagement in meaningful occupations. It is now time that our profession stands confident in our ability to be leaders in the field of assessment of individuals with severe cognitive impairments and drive change to improve consistency and quality of care. We completed a systematic review of OTs’ cognitive assessment practices in the acute stroke setting for individuals with severe cognitive impairment. Five academic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, AMED and Embase) were searched and no study was found that explicitly looked at assessment practices for severe cognitive impairment post stroke. Four related studies (Geraghty et al., 2019; Koh et al., 2009; Korner-Bitensky et al., 2011; Pilegaard et al., 2014) focused on the assessment of individuals with mild cognitive impairment post stroke and participants were predominantly experienced OTs, with 5–10 years of stroke experience. These studies found that while OTs preferred using functional cognitive assessments, because they are client centred and meaningful to the patient (Koh et al., 2009), there was a wide variability in their content (Pilegaard et al., 2014). The content of functional assessments was mainly developed from their past experiences and colleague recommendations, rather than informed from research (Holmqvist et al., 2009; Koh et al., 2009).","PeriodicalId":49096,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Occupational Therapy","volume":"86 1","pages":"529 - 530"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Turning the spotlight on assessment of severe cognitive impairment: Reducing disparity and inequality in stroke care\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Stadden, A. Morrissey\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03080226231178109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"More than 100,000 strokes occur in the United Kingdom (UK) each year (Stroke Association, 2023). Decreasing stroke mortality rates have resulted in more people living with long-term disabilities, with approximately 50% of survivors demonstrating neurocognitive difficulties (Barbay et al., 2018). Cognitive impairment in the acute phase post stroke has been shown to impact participation in rehabilitation and increase the risk of poorer functional outcomes (D’Souza et al., 2021). Initial cognitive assessments play an important role in informing clinical reasoning for a person’s onward rehabilitation and care decisions; if an upward trajectory of improvement is demonstrated at an impairment and/or functional level, this further supports the need for referrals to inpatient specialist rehabilitation. Therefore, measuring their cognitive baseline following a stroke is pertinent to inform clinical decisions for professionals as well as advocate for patients where onward specialist rehabilitation is required to optimise their recovery. Completing cognitive assessment in the acute phase post stroke is recommended within national stroke guidelines (Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party, 2023) and these are routinely completed by occupational therapists (OTs) (Manee et al., 2020). For individuals with severe cognitive impairment following a stroke, they are highly unlikely to be able to engage in standardised assessments (Elliott et al., 2019), and functional cognitive assessments are recommended (Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party, 2023). OTs hold unique expertise in understanding occupation and the environmental impact on function. Through the utilisation of these specialist skills, we provide a vital contribution to cognitive assessments. Not only this, but we are skilled in implementing cognitive assessment results to support participation, choice and engagement in meaningful occupations. It is now time that our profession stands confident in our ability to be leaders in the field of assessment of individuals with severe cognitive impairments and drive change to improve consistency and quality of care. We completed a systematic review of OTs’ cognitive assessment practices in the acute stroke setting for individuals with severe cognitive impairment. Five academic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, AMED and Embase) were searched and no study was found that explicitly looked at assessment practices for severe cognitive impairment post stroke. Four related studies (Geraghty et al., 2019; Koh et al., 2009; Korner-Bitensky et al., 2011; Pilegaard et al., 2014) focused on the assessment of individuals with mild cognitive impairment post stroke and participants were predominantly experienced OTs, with 5–10 years of stroke experience. These studies found that while OTs preferred using functional cognitive assessments, because they are client centred and meaningful to the patient (Koh et al., 2009), there was a wide variability in their content (Pilegaard et al., 2014). The content of functional assessments was mainly developed from their past experiences and colleague recommendations, rather than informed from research (Holmqvist et al., 2009; Koh et al., 2009).\",\"PeriodicalId\":49096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"volume\":\"86 1\",\"pages\":\"529 - 530\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Occupational Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226231178109\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Occupational Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03080226231178109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
英国每年发生的中风超过100000例(中风协会,2023年)。中风死亡率的下降导致更多的人长期残疾,约50%的幸存者表现出神经认知困难(Barbay等人,2018)。中风后急性期的认知障碍已被证明会影响康复参与,并增加功能较差的风险(D’Souza等人,2021)。初始认知评估在为一个人的后续康复和护理决策提供临床推理方面发挥着重要作用;如果在损伤和/或功能水平上表现出改善的上升轨迹,这进一步支持了转诊到住院专科康复的需求。因此,测量他们在中风后的认知基线有助于为专业人员的临床决策提供信息,并为需要继续进行专业康复以优化康复的患者提供支持。建议在国家中风指南中完成中风后急性期的认知评估(校际中风工作组,2023),这些评估由职业治疗师(OT)定期完成(Manee等人,2020)。对于中风后有严重认知障碍的人,他们极不可能进行标准化评估(Elliott et al.,2019),建议进行功能性认知评估(校际中风工作组,2023)。OT在理解职业和环境对功能的影响方面拥有独特的专业知识。通过利用这些专业技能,我们为认知评估做出了至关重要的贡献。不仅如此,我们还善于实施认知评估结果,以支持参与、选择和参与有意义的职业。现在是时候让我们的专业人士相信我们有能力成为严重认知障碍患者评估领域的领导者,并推动变革以提高护理的一致性和质量了。我们完成了对OT在严重认知障碍患者急性中风环境中的认知评估实践的系统回顾。检索了五个学术数据库(MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsychINFO、AMED和Embase),没有发现明确关注卒中后严重认知障碍评估实践的研究。四项相关研究(Geraghty等人,2019;Koh等人,2009年;Korner-Bitensky等人,2011年;Pilegaard等人,2014)专注于评估中风后轻度认知障碍的个体,参与者主要是有5–10年中风经验的OTs。这些研究发现,虽然OT更喜欢使用功能性认知评估,因为它们以客户为中心,对患者有意义(Koh et al.,2009),但其内容存在很大差异(Pilegaard et al.,2014)。功能评估的内容主要是根据他们过去的经验和同事的建议制定的,而不是根据研究制定的(Holmqvist等人,2009;Koh等人,2009年)。
Turning the spotlight on assessment of severe cognitive impairment: Reducing disparity and inequality in stroke care
More than 100,000 strokes occur in the United Kingdom (UK) each year (Stroke Association, 2023). Decreasing stroke mortality rates have resulted in more people living with long-term disabilities, with approximately 50% of survivors demonstrating neurocognitive difficulties (Barbay et al., 2018). Cognitive impairment in the acute phase post stroke has been shown to impact participation in rehabilitation and increase the risk of poorer functional outcomes (D’Souza et al., 2021). Initial cognitive assessments play an important role in informing clinical reasoning for a person’s onward rehabilitation and care decisions; if an upward trajectory of improvement is demonstrated at an impairment and/or functional level, this further supports the need for referrals to inpatient specialist rehabilitation. Therefore, measuring their cognitive baseline following a stroke is pertinent to inform clinical decisions for professionals as well as advocate for patients where onward specialist rehabilitation is required to optimise their recovery. Completing cognitive assessment in the acute phase post stroke is recommended within national stroke guidelines (Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party, 2023) and these are routinely completed by occupational therapists (OTs) (Manee et al., 2020). For individuals with severe cognitive impairment following a stroke, they are highly unlikely to be able to engage in standardised assessments (Elliott et al., 2019), and functional cognitive assessments are recommended (Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party, 2023). OTs hold unique expertise in understanding occupation and the environmental impact on function. Through the utilisation of these specialist skills, we provide a vital contribution to cognitive assessments. Not only this, but we are skilled in implementing cognitive assessment results to support participation, choice and engagement in meaningful occupations. It is now time that our profession stands confident in our ability to be leaders in the field of assessment of individuals with severe cognitive impairments and drive change to improve consistency and quality of care. We completed a systematic review of OTs’ cognitive assessment practices in the acute stroke setting for individuals with severe cognitive impairment. Five academic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsychINFO, AMED and Embase) were searched and no study was found that explicitly looked at assessment practices for severe cognitive impairment post stroke. Four related studies (Geraghty et al., 2019; Koh et al., 2009; Korner-Bitensky et al., 2011; Pilegaard et al., 2014) focused on the assessment of individuals with mild cognitive impairment post stroke and participants were predominantly experienced OTs, with 5–10 years of stroke experience. These studies found that while OTs preferred using functional cognitive assessments, because they are client centred and meaningful to the patient (Koh et al., 2009), there was a wide variability in their content (Pilegaard et al., 2014). The content of functional assessments was mainly developed from their past experiences and colleague recommendations, rather than informed from research (Holmqvist et al., 2009; Koh et al., 2009).
期刊介绍:
British Journal of Occupational Therapy (BJOT) is the official journal of the Royal College of Occupational Therapists. Its purpose is to publish articles with international relevance that advance knowledge in research, practice, education, and management in occupational therapy. It is a monthly peer reviewed publication that disseminates evidence on the effectiveness, benefit, and value of occupational therapy so that occupational therapists, service users, and key stakeholders can make informed decisions. BJOT publishes research articles, reviews, practice analyses, opinion pieces, editorials, letters to the editor and book reviews. It also regularly publishes special issues on topics relevant to occupational therapy.