书评

IF 0.7 2区 社会学 Q2 LAW International Journal of Evidence & Proof Pub Date : 2023-05-24 DOI:10.1177/13657127231176969
Polly Hernandez
{"title":"书评","authors":"Polly Hernandez","doi":"10.1177/13657127231176969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The rise of managerialist values and the ‘efficiency drive’ within the criminal justice system has been well-documented in the English and Welsh context (McEwan, 2011). Much of the literature has focused on the implications of this managerial drive on traditional criminal justice principles (Roberts, 2022), as well as the impact of increasingly managerialist environments on various legal actors within the justice process (Thomason 2021; Derbyshire, 2014). Given the pace of change and the increasing endorsement of managerial values in justice systems around the world, important questions still remain as to the impacts of managerialism in the criminal justice context. How does managerialism, in its many and various guises, impact traditional criminal justice values in different jurisdictions? How does managerialism impact the different stages of the justice process? What are the impacts of managerialism in the inquisitorial and adversarial contexts respectively? This book seeks to answer those questions, and goes some distance in providing answers on the manifestations and impacts of the ‘managerialist creep’ that is of concern not only in England and Wales but in justice systems around the world. This edited collection brings together a range of contributions that consider these complex questions and, crucially, through a global lens. The book comprises seven chapters focusing on the impacts of bureaucratisation and efficiency drives in criminal justice, with each chapter offering a perspective from a different jurisdiction. The first four chapters examine the effects of managerialism in the pre-trial stages of the justice process, by evaluating the changing role of public prosecutors in France, the Netherlands, Greece and China. The remaining chapters then consider the impacts of managerialism on specific actors within the justice system. Chapter 5 explores how judges have responded to an increasing environment of managerialism, Chapter 6 considers the impact on defence lawyers, and Chapter 7 on victim support agencies. The chapters are expertly woven together, and are presented in a logical order that reflects the sequential stages of the justice process. This book will be of particular interest to those working and studying in the area of criminal justice and procedure, and the quality of the text is such that it will be illuminating and of interest to those with either a comparative or a domestic focus. This review sets out chapter-by-chapter analysis before offering some final reflections, critique and praise for the editors.","PeriodicalId":54168,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Evidence & Proof","volume":"27 1","pages":"254 - 256"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review\",\"authors\":\"Polly Hernandez\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13657127231176969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction The rise of managerialist values and the ‘efficiency drive’ within the criminal justice system has been well-documented in the English and Welsh context (McEwan, 2011). Much of the literature has focused on the implications of this managerial drive on traditional criminal justice principles (Roberts, 2022), as well as the impact of increasingly managerialist environments on various legal actors within the justice process (Thomason 2021; Derbyshire, 2014). Given the pace of change and the increasing endorsement of managerial values in justice systems around the world, important questions still remain as to the impacts of managerialism in the criminal justice context. How does managerialism, in its many and various guises, impact traditional criminal justice values in different jurisdictions? How does managerialism impact the different stages of the justice process? What are the impacts of managerialism in the inquisitorial and adversarial contexts respectively? This book seeks to answer those questions, and goes some distance in providing answers on the manifestations and impacts of the ‘managerialist creep’ that is of concern not only in England and Wales but in justice systems around the world. This edited collection brings together a range of contributions that consider these complex questions and, crucially, through a global lens. The book comprises seven chapters focusing on the impacts of bureaucratisation and efficiency drives in criminal justice, with each chapter offering a perspective from a different jurisdiction. The first four chapters examine the effects of managerialism in the pre-trial stages of the justice process, by evaluating the changing role of public prosecutors in France, the Netherlands, Greece and China. The remaining chapters then consider the impacts of managerialism on specific actors within the justice system. Chapter 5 explores how judges have responded to an increasing environment of managerialism, Chapter 6 considers the impact on defence lawyers, and Chapter 7 on victim support agencies. The chapters are expertly woven together, and are presented in a logical order that reflects the sequential stages of the justice process. This book will be of particular interest to those working and studying in the area of criminal justice and procedure, and the quality of the text is such that it will be illuminating and of interest to those with either a comparative or a domestic focus. This review sets out chapter-by-chapter analysis before offering some final reflections, critique and praise for the editors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Evidence & Proof\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"254 - 256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Evidence & Proof\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127231176969\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Evidence & Proof","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127231176969","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言刑事司法系统中管理主义价值观和“效率驱动”的兴起在英语和威尔士语中得到了充分的证明(McEwan,2011)。许多文献都集中在这种管理驱动对传统刑事司法原则的影响上(Roberts,2022),以及日益增多的管理主义环境对司法过程中各种法律行为体的影响(Thomason 2021;德比郡,2014)。鉴于变革的步伐和世界各地司法系统对管理价值观的日益认可,管理主义在刑事司法背景下的影响仍然存在重要问题。管理主义以其多种形式如何影响不同司法管辖区的传统刑事司法价值观?管理主义如何影响司法程序的不同阶段?管理主义分别在审问和对抗的背景下产生了什么影响?这本书试图回答这些问题,并在一定程度上回答了“管理主义蔓延”的表现和影响,这不仅在英格兰和威尔士,而且在世界各地的司法系统中都令人担忧。这本经过编辑的合集汇集了一系列考虑这些复杂问题的贡献,至关重要的是,通过全球视角。这本书由七章组成,重点关注刑事司法中官僚化和效率驱动的影响,每章都从不同的司法管辖区提供了一个视角。前四章通过评估法国、荷兰、希腊和中国检察官角色的变化,考察了管理主义在司法程序预审阶段的影响。接下来的章节将考虑管理主义对司法系统内特定行为者的影响。第5章探讨了法官如何应对日益增长的管理主义环境,第6章考虑了对辩护律师的影响,第7章讨论了受害者支持机构。这些章节被熟练地编织在一起,并以反映司法程序顺序阶段的逻辑顺序呈现。这本书将引起那些在刑事司法和诉讼领域工作和研究的人的特别兴趣,文本的质量使它具有启发性,并引起那些具有比较或国内重点的人的兴趣。这篇综述逐章进行了分析,然后对编辑们进行了最后的反思、批评和赞扬。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Review
Introduction The rise of managerialist values and the ‘efficiency drive’ within the criminal justice system has been well-documented in the English and Welsh context (McEwan, 2011). Much of the literature has focused on the implications of this managerial drive on traditional criminal justice principles (Roberts, 2022), as well as the impact of increasingly managerialist environments on various legal actors within the justice process (Thomason 2021; Derbyshire, 2014). Given the pace of change and the increasing endorsement of managerial values in justice systems around the world, important questions still remain as to the impacts of managerialism in the criminal justice context. How does managerialism, in its many and various guises, impact traditional criminal justice values in different jurisdictions? How does managerialism impact the different stages of the justice process? What are the impacts of managerialism in the inquisitorial and adversarial contexts respectively? This book seeks to answer those questions, and goes some distance in providing answers on the manifestations and impacts of the ‘managerialist creep’ that is of concern not only in England and Wales but in justice systems around the world. This edited collection brings together a range of contributions that consider these complex questions and, crucially, through a global lens. The book comprises seven chapters focusing on the impacts of bureaucratisation and efficiency drives in criminal justice, with each chapter offering a perspective from a different jurisdiction. The first four chapters examine the effects of managerialism in the pre-trial stages of the justice process, by evaluating the changing role of public prosecutors in France, the Netherlands, Greece and China. The remaining chapters then consider the impacts of managerialism on specific actors within the justice system. Chapter 5 explores how judges have responded to an increasing environment of managerialism, Chapter 6 considers the impact on defence lawyers, and Chapter 7 on victim support agencies. The chapters are expertly woven together, and are presented in a logical order that reflects the sequential stages of the justice process. This book will be of particular interest to those working and studying in the area of criminal justice and procedure, and the quality of the text is such that it will be illuminating and of interest to those with either a comparative or a domestic focus. This review sets out chapter-by-chapter analysis before offering some final reflections, critique and praise for the editors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Preponderance, proportionality, stepwise liability Stepwise liability: Between the preponderance rule and proportional liability The skewing effect of outcome evidence The economic case for conviction multiplicity What matters for assessing insider witnesses? Results of an experimental vignette study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1