传热系数参考温度对超临界CO2数值模型验证的影响

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1115/1.4051637
Ya-tsʻêng d. Chao, Nicholas C. Lopes, Mark A. Ricklick, S. Boetcher
{"title":"传热系数参考温度对超临界CO2数值模型验证的影响","authors":"Ya-tsʻêng d. Chao, Nicholas C. Lopes, Mark A. Ricklick, S. Boetcher","doi":"10.1115/1.4051637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Validating turbulence models for cooling supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) in a horizontal pipe is challenging due to the lack of experimental data with spatially resolved local temperature measurements. Although many variables may be present to cause discrepancies between numerical and experimental data, this study focuses on how the choice of reference temperatures (both wall reference temperature and fluid bulk reference temperature) when calculating the heat transfer coefficient influences turbulence-model validation results. While it may seem straightforward to simply use the same parameters as the experimental setup, this has not been observed in practice. In this work, numerical simulations are performed for cooling sCO2 in a horizontal pipe for p = 8 MPa, d = 6 mm, G = 200, and 400 kg/(m2s), and qw = 12, 24, and 33 kW/m2. Local and average heat transfer coefficients with different reference temperatures, found to be frequently used in the literature, are presented and compared with commonly used experimental data. It was found that the choice of reference temperatures has a significant influence on the results of the numerical validation. Historically, the higher heat flux cases have been more difficult to validate, theorized due to using reference temperatures differing from the experiment; however, good agreement was found here using the reference temperatures that most closely matched the experiment. This not only highlights the need for careful selection of reference temperatures in simulations, but also the importance of clearly defining the reference temperature employed when reporting experimental results.","PeriodicalId":52254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of the Heat Transfer Coefficient Reference Temperatures on Validating Numerical Models of Supercritical CO2\",\"authors\":\"Ya-tsʻêng d. Chao, Nicholas C. Lopes, Mark A. Ricklick, S. Boetcher\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4051637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Validating turbulence models for cooling supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) in a horizontal pipe is challenging due to the lack of experimental data with spatially resolved local temperature measurements. Although many variables may be present to cause discrepancies between numerical and experimental data, this study focuses on how the choice of reference temperatures (both wall reference temperature and fluid bulk reference temperature) when calculating the heat transfer coefficient influences turbulence-model validation results. While it may seem straightforward to simply use the same parameters as the experimental setup, this has not been observed in practice. In this work, numerical simulations are performed for cooling sCO2 in a horizontal pipe for p = 8 MPa, d = 6 mm, G = 200, and 400 kg/(m2s), and qw = 12, 24, and 33 kW/m2. Local and average heat transfer coefficients with different reference temperatures, found to be frequently used in the literature, are presented and compared with commonly used experimental data. It was found that the choice of reference temperatures has a significant influence on the results of the numerical validation. Historically, the higher heat flux cases have been more difficult to validate, theorized due to using reference temperatures differing from the experiment; however, good agreement was found here using the reference temperatures that most closely matched the experiment. This not only highlights the need for careful selection of reference temperatures in simulations, but also the importance of clearly defining the reference temperature employed when reporting experimental results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4051637\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4051637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

由于缺乏具有空间分辨率的局部温度测量的实验数据,验证水平管道中冷却超临界二氧化碳(sCO2)的湍流模型具有挑战性。虽然可能存在许多变量导致数值和实验数据之间的差异,但本研究的重点是计算传热系数时参考温度(壁面参考温度和流体体参考温度)的选择如何影响湍流模型验证结果。虽然简单地使用与实验设置相同的参数似乎很简单,但在实践中并未观察到这一点。在这项工作中,数值模拟了在p = 8 MPa, d = 6 mm, G = 200和400 kg/(m2s), qw = 12, 24和33 kW/m2的水平管道中冷却sCO2的情况。本文给出了文献中常用的不同参考温度下的局部传热系数和平均传热系数,并与常用的实验数据进行了比较。结果表明,参考温度的选择对数值验证结果有显著影响。从历史上看,由于使用与实验不同的参考温度,较高的热通量情况更难以验证;然而,使用与实验最接近的参考温度,这里发现了很好的一致性。这不仅强调了在模拟中仔细选择参考温度的必要性,而且还强调了在报告实验结果时明确定义参考温度的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of the Heat Transfer Coefficient Reference Temperatures on Validating Numerical Models of Supercritical CO2
Validating turbulence models for cooling supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) in a horizontal pipe is challenging due to the lack of experimental data with spatially resolved local temperature measurements. Although many variables may be present to cause discrepancies between numerical and experimental data, this study focuses on how the choice of reference temperatures (both wall reference temperature and fluid bulk reference temperature) when calculating the heat transfer coefficient influences turbulence-model validation results. While it may seem straightforward to simply use the same parameters as the experimental setup, this has not been observed in practice. In this work, numerical simulations are performed for cooling sCO2 in a horizontal pipe for p = 8 MPa, d = 6 mm, G = 200, and 400 kg/(m2s), and qw = 12, 24, and 33 kW/m2. Local and average heat transfer coefficients with different reference temperatures, found to be frequently used in the literature, are presented and compared with commonly used experimental data. It was found that the choice of reference temperatures has a significant influence on the results of the numerical validation. Historically, the higher heat flux cases have been more difficult to validate, theorized due to using reference temperatures differing from the experiment; however, good agreement was found here using the reference temperatures that most closely matched the experiment. This not only highlights the need for careful selection of reference temperatures in simulations, but also the importance of clearly defining the reference temperature employed when reporting experimental results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
A Curved Surface Integral Method for Reliability Analysis of Multiple Failure Modes System with Non-Overlapping Failure Domains A Framework for Developing Systematic Testbeds for Multi-Fidelity Optimization Techniques Reliability Analysis for RV Reducer by Combining PCE and Saddlepoint Approximation Considering Multi-Failure Modes Machine Learning-Based Resilience Modeling and Assessment of High Consequence Systems Under Uncertainty Posterior Covariance Matrix Approximations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1