关于“阿尔卑斯”在高海拔热带环境中的应用

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Mountain Research and Development Pub Date : 2023-03-13 DOI:10.1659/mrd.2022.00024
E. Suárez, A. Encalada, Segundo Chimbolema, R. Jaramillo, R. Hofstede, D. Riveros‐Iregui
{"title":"关于“阿尔卑斯”在高海拔热带环境中的应用","authors":"E. Suárez, A. Encalada, Segundo Chimbolema, R. Jaramillo, R. Hofstede, D. Riveros‐Iregui","doi":"10.1659/mrd.2022.00024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study of mountain ecosystems has a long tradition. This can be traced from the extensive geological surveys of Horace de Saussure in the 1800s in the European Alps (Billing 2019) to the seminal research that Humboldt performed on his trip through the Andes (Linder et al 2019; Moret et al 2019). However, the geographical distribution of the research has remained biased toward the global North and, more specifically, to the mountain ranges of Europe and North America (K€ orner 2003). This bias means that the understanding of mountains has been mostly based on temperate ranges in which the lives and ecology of organisms are tied to the marked rhythms that seasons impose on temperature, precipitation, and irradiance (but see Llamb ı and Rada 2019). The historical bias seems also to have percolated into the language that we use to describe mountain ecosystems. The adjective ‘‘alpine,’’ for example, has become a standard term to describe the high-elevation ecosystems that occupy the higher reaches of mountains, above the climatic tree line. Similarly, ‘‘tropical alpine,’’ is used to describe the ecosystems and vegetation that characterize the highelevation landscape of the Northern Andes and other tropical mountains (Hedberg and Hedberg 1979; Smith and Cleef 1988; Christmann and Oliveras 2020). However, this generalized use of ‘‘alpine’’ could result in 2 unintended outcomes. On the one hand, it might restrict the usefulness of the word ‘‘alpine’’ as a descriptor of the particular ecosystem traits and environmental characteristics of the temperate mountains that inspired the original use of the term. On the other hand, while used to describe the outstanding diversity of high-elevation ecosystems in the world, ‘‘alpine’’ might become simply synonymous with ‘‘high mountain,’’ thus failing to convey any meaningful idea of the diverse and unique environments that dominate the upper reaches of the mountains of the world. Therefore, does the term ‘‘alpine’’ accurately encompass the heterogeneous nature of all high-elevation ecosystems across the world, or does its reference to the temperate, seasonal landscape entail an ambiguous generalization? In this commentary, we examine the use of ‘‘alpine’’ as an overarching term to broadly describe high-elevation ecosystems and their species, using as an example the p aramo of the humid Northern Andes.","PeriodicalId":49793,"journal":{"name":"Mountain Research and Development","volume":"43 1","pages":"V1 - V4"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Use of “Alpine” for High-Elevation Tropical Environments\",\"authors\":\"E. Suárez, A. Encalada, Segundo Chimbolema, R. Jaramillo, R. Hofstede, D. Riveros‐Iregui\",\"doi\":\"10.1659/mrd.2022.00024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study of mountain ecosystems has a long tradition. This can be traced from the extensive geological surveys of Horace de Saussure in the 1800s in the European Alps (Billing 2019) to the seminal research that Humboldt performed on his trip through the Andes (Linder et al 2019; Moret et al 2019). However, the geographical distribution of the research has remained biased toward the global North and, more specifically, to the mountain ranges of Europe and North America (K€ orner 2003). This bias means that the understanding of mountains has been mostly based on temperate ranges in which the lives and ecology of organisms are tied to the marked rhythms that seasons impose on temperature, precipitation, and irradiance (but see Llamb ı and Rada 2019). The historical bias seems also to have percolated into the language that we use to describe mountain ecosystems. The adjective ‘‘alpine,’’ for example, has become a standard term to describe the high-elevation ecosystems that occupy the higher reaches of mountains, above the climatic tree line. Similarly, ‘‘tropical alpine,’’ is used to describe the ecosystems and vegetation that characterize the highelevation landscape of the Northern Andes and other tropical mountains (Hedberg and Hedberg 1979; Smith and Cleef 1988; Christmann and Oliveras 2020). However, this generalized use of ‘‘alpine’’ could result in 2 unintended outcomes. On the one hand, it might restrict the usefulness of the word ‘‘alpine’’ as a descriptor of the particular ecosystem traits and environmental characteristics of the temperate mountains that inspired the original use of the term. On the other hand, while used to describe the outstanding diversity of high-elevation ecosystems in the world, ‘‘alpine’’ might become simply synonymous with ‘‘high mountain,’’ thus failing to convey any meaningful idea of the diverse and unique environments that dominate the upper reaches of the mountains of the world. Therefore, does the term ‘‘alpine’’ accurately encompass the heterogeneous nature of all high-elevation ecosystems across the world, or does its reference to the temperate, seasonal landscape entail an ambiguous generalization? In this commentary, we examine the use of ‘‘alpine’’ as an overarching term to broadly describe high-elevation ecosystems and their species, using as an example the p aramo of the humid Northern Andes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mountain Research and Development\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"V1 - V4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mountain Research and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.2022.00024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mountain Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1659/mrd.2022.00024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究山区生态系统有着悠久的传统。这可以追溯到19世纪霍勒斯·德·索绪尔在欧洲阿尔卑斯山的广泛地质调查(Billing 2019),以及洪堡在安第斯山脉之旅中进行的开创性研究(Linder等人,2019;Moret等人,2019)。然而,研究的地理分布仍然偏向于全球北方,更具体地说,偏向于欧洲和北美的山脉(K€orner 2003)。这种偏见意味着,对山脉的理解主要基于温带范围,在温带范围内,生物的生活和生态与季节对温度、降水和辐照度施加的显著节奏有关(但见Llambı和Rada 2019)。历史偏见似乎也渗透到了我们用来描述山区生态系统的语言中。例如,形容词“阿尔卑斯”已成为描述高海拔生态系统的标准术语,这些生态系统位于气候树线以上的山脉上游。类似地,“热带高山”用于描述安第斯山脉北部和其他热带山脉高海拔景观的生态系统和植被(Hedberg和Hedberg 1979;Smith和Cleef 1988;Christmann和Oliveras 2020)。然而,这种“alpine”的普遍使用可能会导致两种意想不到的结果。一方面,它可能会限制“阿尔卑斯山”一词作为温带山脉特定生态系统特征和环境特征的描述词的有用性,这些特征和环境特点激发了该词的最初使用。另一方面,虽然“阿尔卑斯”被用来描述世界上高海拔生态系统的杰出多样性,但它可能只是“高山”的同义词,从而无法传达出任何关于主宰世界山脉上游的多样性和独特环境的有意义的想法。因此,“高山”一词是否准确地涵盖了世界各地所有高海拔生态系统的异质性,或者它对温带季节性景观的引用是否意味着模糊的概括?在这篇评论中,我们以潮湿的安第斯山脉北部的帕拉莫为例,研究了“阿尔卑斯”作为一个总体术语的使用,以广泛描述高海拔生态系统及其物种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On the Use of “Alpine” for High-Elevation Tropical Environments
The study of mountain ecosystems has a long tradition. This can be traced from the extensive geological surveys of Horace de Saussure in the 1800s in the European Alps (Billing 2019) to the seminal research that Humboldt performed on his trip through the Andes (Linder et al 2019; Moret et al 2019). However, the geographical distribution of the research has remained biased toward the global North and, more specifically, to the mountain ranges of Europe and North America (K€ orner 2003). This bias means that the understanding of mountains has been mostly based on temperate ranges in which the lives and ecology of organisms are tied to the marked rhythms that seasons impose on temperature, precipitation, and irradiance (but see Llamb ı and Rada 2019). The historical bias seems also to have percolated into the language that we use to describe mountain ecosystems. The adjective ‘‘alpine,’’ for example, has become a standard term to describe the high-elevation ecosystems that occupy the higher reaches of mountains, above the climatic tree line. Similarly, ‘‘tropical alpine,’’ is used to describe the ecosystems and vegetation that characterize the highelevation landscape of the Northern Andes and other tropical mountains (Hedberg and Hedberg 1979; Smith and Cleef 1988; Christmann and Oliveras 2020). However, this generalized use of ‘‘alpine’’ could result in 2 unintended outcomes. On the one hand, it might restrict the usefulness of the word ‘‘alpine’’ as a descriptor of the particular ecosystem traits and environmental characteristics of the temperate mountains that inspired the original use of the term. On the other hand, while used to describe the outstanding diversity of high-elevation ecosystems in the world, ‘‘alpine’’ might become simply synonymous with ‘‘high mountain,’’ thus failing to convey any meaningful idea of the diverse and unique environments that dominate the upper reaches of the mountains of the world. Therefore, does the term ‘‘alpine’’ accurately encompass the heterogeneous nature of all high-elevation ecosystems across the world, or does its reference to the temperate, seasonal landscape entail an ambiguous generalization? In this commentary, we examine the use of ‘‘alpine’’ as an overarching term to broadly describe high-elevation ecosystems and their species, using as an example the p aramo of the humid Northern Andes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mountain Research and Development
Mountain Research and Development 地学-环境科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
18.80%
发文量
36
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: MRD features three peer-reviewed sections: MountainDevelopment, which contains “Transformation Knowledge,” MountainResearch, which contains “Systems Knowledge,” and MountainAgenda, which contains “Target Knowledge.” In addition, the MountainPlatform section offers International Mountain Society members an opportunity to convey information about their mountain initiatives and priorities; and the MountainMedia section presents reviews of recent publications on mountains and mountain development. Key research and development fields: -Society and culture- Policy, politics, and institutions- Economy- Bio- and geophysical environment- Ecosystems and cycles- Environmental risks- Resource and land use- Energy, infrastructure, and services- Methods and theories- Regions
期刊最新文献
Pastoralism in Changthang, Ladakh: Adaptations, Challenges, and Pathways for Sustainability Understanding the Heterogeneity of Swiss Alpine Summer Farms for Tailored Agricultural Policies: A Typology Social Technology for the Protection of the Páramo in the Central Andes of Ecuador Drying of Springs in the Himalayan Region of Nepal: Perspectives of Local Government Leaders on Causes, Consequences, and Conservation Efforts Publisher Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1