制造驱逐人口:欧洲驱逐单位内部的官僚知识实践

IF 1.4 3区 社会学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY Polar-Political and Legal Anthropology Review Pub Date : 2021-11-24 DOI:10.1111/plar.12447
Lieke M. Wissink
{"title":"制造驱逐人口:欧洲驱逐单位内部的官僚知识实践","authors":"Lieke M. Wissink","doi":"10.1111/plar.12447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores how people are made deportable through bureaucratic practices within European migration infrastructures. Drawing on months of ethnographic fieldwork in a deportation unit, the article focuses on the daily work of file practices. Bridging schol-arship on street-level bureaucrats and the materiality of paperwork, it traces how depor-tation files move along procedural trajectories, among case workers, databases, police, whiteboards, quota, subunits, embassies, and airlines. This shows how the relations gathered in file practices mobilize categories of populations, for example racialized or gen-dered. The research elaborates that the deportable subject is formed in a constellation of various populations, paradoxically given the legal call to individualize all deportees. Moreover, the populations themselves need to be made in file practices, too, unfolding a dual bureaucratic knowledge practice that shows the populations that are demarcated by state deportations to be intrinsically situated.","PeriodicalId":56256,"journal":{"name":"Polar-Political and Legal Anthropology Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Making Populations for Deportation: Bureaucratic Knowledge Practices Inside a European Deportation Unit\",\"authors\":\"Lieke M. Wissink\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/plar.12447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores how people are made deportable through bureaucratic practices within European migration infrastructures. Drawing on months of ethnographic fieldwork in a deportation unit, the article focuses on the daily work of file practices. Bridging schol-arship on street-level bureaucrats and the materiality of paperwork, it traces how depor-tation files move along procedural trajectories, among case workers, databases, police, whiteboards, quota, subunits, embassies, and airlines. This shows how the relations gathered in file practices mobilize categories of populations, for example racialized or gen-dered. The research elaborates that the deportable subject is formed in a constellation of various populations, paradoxically given the legal call to individualize all deportees. Moreover, the populations themselves need to be made in file practices, too, unfolding a dual bureaucratic knowledge practice that shows the populations that are demarcated by state deportations to be intrinsically situated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polar-Political and Legal Anthropology Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polar-Political and Legal Anthropology Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12447\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polar-Political and Legal Anthropology Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文探讨了如何通过欧洲移民基础设施内的官僚做法将人们驱逐出境。这篇文章借鉴了驱逐单位数月的民族志实地调查,重点介绍了档案实践的日常工作。它将街头官僚和文书工作的实质性联系在一起,追踪了档案如何在办案人员、数据库、警察、白板、配额、分支机构、大使馆和航空公司之间沿着程序轨迹移动。这表明了档案实践中收集的关系是如何动员各类人群的,例如种族化或性别化。该研究阐述了可驱逐主体是在不同人群中形成的,矛盾的是,法律呼吁对所有被驱逐者进行个性化处理。此外,人口本身也需要在档案中进行实践,展开双重官僚知识实践,表明被国家驱逐出境划分的人口处于固有的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Making Populations for Deportation: Bureaucratic Knowledge Practices Inside a European Deportation Unit
This article explores how people are made deportable through bureaucratic practices within European migration infrastructures. Drawing on months of ethnographic fieldwork in a deportation unit, the article focuses on the daily work of file practices. Bridging schol-arship on street-level bureaucrats and the materiality of paperwork, it traces how depor-tation files move along procedural trajectories, among case workers, databases, police, whiteboards, quota, subunits, embassies, and airlines. This shows how the relations gathered in file practices mobilize categories of populations, for example racialized or gen-dered. The research elaborates that the deportable subject is formed in a constellation of various populations, paradoxically given the legal call to individualize all deportees. Moreover, the populations themselves need to be made in file practices, too, unfolding a dual bureaucratic knowledge practice that shows the populations that are demarcated by state deportations to be intrinsically situated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
28
期刊最新文献
Stitching a rights narrative: How Syrian women in Shatila use embroidery to express ideas about social justice Beyond lawfare: An analysis of law's temporality through Russian‐doll urbanization from Turkey From garbage wars to green city: Defining Ukraine's European identity Zones of compounded informality: Migrants in the megacity “For just decisions we need you!”: Relational decision‐making and the bureaucratic exclusion of “poor others”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1