{"title":"巴西城市固体废物管理概况分析","authors":"Isabel das Mercês Costa, M. F. Dias, M. Robaina","doi":"10.5276/jswtm/2022.228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The management of urban solid waste (USWM) brings in its core, techniques, guidelines and standards to ensure the sustainability of the processes of generation, collection, reuse and disposal of waste. Since the 70s, the processes involving the USWM have undergone changes influenced\n by the behaviour of the generator, consumption patterns, impacts on the environment and by economic, political and social transformations. Although the need to reinsert waste into the production chain seems to be a consensus, scientific investigations point to clear regional differences in\n terms of management direction. As a result, this reveals a scenario composed of regions that managed to adhere to the principles of circular waste management, and others, especially those of medium and low income, which were able to neutralise problems inherent to the primary processes of\n management, such as collection and final disposal. Factors such as technical and financial capacity, legislation, regulation/inspection and the involvement of society in the discussions and deliberations related to the waste sector, have also been pointed out by the literature as determining\n the dimension of the advance or delay of the USWM. In this sense, the analysis of the different performances of the USWM of the countries, states, and/or municipalities and the identification of the factors that provoke this differentiation, are essential to point out, what the challenges\n and perspectives for promoting the advancement of the USWM are, according to the investigated local reality. The present research is descriptive and exploratory and has a general objective: to analyse the profile of the USWM of 786 Brazilian municipalities regarding the waste collection process\n and the adequacy of municipalities with the National Solid Waste Policy-NSWP (Law 12.305/ 2010), and discuss possible external factors of influence. The year evaluated corresponds to 2018 and the empirical analyses involved the municipalities which have all the model variables available in\n the National Sanitation Information System-SNIS base. For the optimisation of the investigation, the cities were classified into clusters according to the population, and the analyses were parameterised by 8 qualitative variables (Type of Management, Payment of the Generator, Municipal\n Waste Plan, Social Control, Regulation/Inspection Sector, Selective Collection, Cooperatives/Associations and Final Disposal System), and by 5 quantitative variables (Collection Expenses, Number of Employees, Number of Vehicles, Volume of Solid Urban Waste Collected and Population Served).\n To perceive possible influences of external factors in the USWM, analyses of the municipalities were carried out at regional level, using 8 socioeconomic indicators, called exogenous variables: Municipal Human Development Index (MHDI), MHDI-Income, Population, Density Demographic, Gross Domestic\n Product per capita, Income per capita, Percentage of hospitalisations because of diseases related to inadequate sanitation, and Percentage of people of 25 years of age or older with a college degree. Data from the municipalities were extracted from the following Brazilian electronic platforms:\n SNIS (2019), Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística-IBGE (2010; 2017) and Atlas Brasil (2010, 2017), and the theoretical foundation was supported by international scientific references and Brazilians. The analyses carried out made it possible to achieve the\n following specific objectives: i. present the status of the municipal solid waste collection process in order to provide input for future analysis of the USWM efficiency; ii. verify the adherence of municipalities to the guidelines of Law 12.305/2010; iii. make inferences about the magnitude\n of the analysis variables in the municipalities by Population Class, by Management Type and by Payment of the Generator; iv. present and discuss the profile of municipalities at regional level and v. identify the municipalities with greater adherence to the legislation's criteria, discussing\n the influence of external factors. Cluster analysis showed a greater tendency to suit the USWM in municipalities belonging to the largest population groups: (100.000 to 500.000 inhabitants) and (>500.000 inhabitants). The Autarchy and the Mixed Economy Society stood out as management models\n with a greater tendency towards adequacy and the payment of the generator is also suggested as an influencing variable for the adequacy of the USWM. Of the total number of municipalities evaluated, only 5,6% or 44 showed greater alignment with the NSWP guidelines, having the following profile:\n 91% are located in the most developed regions of the country (South and Southeast); have an average GDP higher than the national average; have a high degree of MHDI, being among the 200 Brazilian municipalities with the highest MHDI; have a very high degree of MHDI-Income, being among the\n 120 municipalities with the highest MHDI.","PeriodicalId":35783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the Solid Urban Waste Management Profile in Brazilian Municipalities\",\"authors\":\"Isabel das Mercês Costa, M. F. Dias, M. Robaina\",\"doi\":\"10.5276/jswtm/2022.228\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The management of urban solid waste (USWM) brings in its core, techniques, guidelines and standards to ensure the sustainability of the processes of generation, collection, reuse and disposal of waste. Since the 70s, the processes involving the USWM have undergone changes influenced\\n by the behaviour of the generator, consumption patterns, impacts on the environment and by economic, political and social transformations. Although the need to reinsert waste into the production chain seems to be a consensus, scientific investigations point to clear regional differences in\\n terms of management direction. As a result, this reveals a scenario composed of regions that managed to adhere to the principles of circular waste management, and others, especially those of medium and low income, which were able to neutralise problems inherent to the primary processes of\\n management, such as collection and final disposal. Factors such as technical and financial capacity, legislation, regulation/inspection and the involvement of society in the discussions and deliberations related to the waste sector, have also been pointed out by the literature as determining\\n the dimension of the advance or delay of the USWM. In this sense, the analysis of the different performances of the USWM of the countries, states, and/or municipalities and the identification of the factors that provoke this differentiation, are essential to point out, what the challenges\\n and perspectives for promoting the advancement of the USWM are, according to the investigated local reality. The present research is descriptive and exploratory and has a general objective: to analyse the profile of the USWM of 786 Brazilian municipalities regarding the waste collection process\\n and the adequacy of municipalities with the National Solid Waste Policy-NSWP (Law 12.305/ 2010), and discuss possible external factors of influence. The year evaluated corresponds to 2018 and the empirical analyses involved the municipalities which have all the model variables available in\\n the National Sanitation Information System-SNIS base. For the optimisation of the investigation, the cities were classified into clusters according to the population, and the analyses were parameterised by 8 qualitative variables (Type of Management, Payment of the Generator, Municipal\\n Waste Plan, Social Control, Regulation/Inspection Sector, Selective Collection, Cooperatives/Associations and Final Disposal System), and by 5 quantitative variables (Collection Expenses, Number of Employees, Number of Vehicles, Volume of Solid Urban Waste Collected and Population Served).\\n To perceive possible influences of external factors in the USWM, analyses of the municipalities were carried out at regional level, using 8 socioeconomic indicators, called exogenous variables: Municipal Human Development Index (MHDI), MHDI-Income, Population, Density Demographic, Gross Domestic\\n Product per capita, Income per capita, Percentage of hospitalisations because of diseases related to inadequate sanitation, and Percentage of people of 25 years of age or older with a college degree. Data from the municipalities were extracted from the following Brazilian electronic platforms:\\n SNIS (2019), Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística-IBGE (2010; 2017) and Atlas Brasil (2010, 2017), and the theoretical foundation was supported by international scientific references and Brazilians. The analyses carried out made it possible to achieve the\\n following specific objectives: i. present the status of the municipal solid waste collection process in order to provide input for future analysis of the USWM efficiency; ii. verify the adherence of municipalities to the guidelines of Law 12.305/2010; iii. make inferences about the magnitude\\n of the analysis variables in the municipalities by Population Class, by Management Type and by Payment of the Generator; iv. present and discuss the profile of municipalities at regional level and v. identify the municipalities with greater adherence to the legislation's criteria, discussing\\n the influence of external factors. Cluster analysis showed a greater tendency to suit the USWM in municipalities belonging to the largest population groups: (100.000 to 500.000 inhabitants) and (>500.000 inhabitants). The Autarchy and the Mixed Economy Society stood out as management models\\n with a greater tendency towards adequacy and the payment of the generator is also suggested as an influencing variable for the adequacy of the USWM. Of the total number of municipalities evaluated, only 5,6% or 44 showed greater alignment with the NSWP guidelines, having the following profile:\\n 91% are located in the most developed regions of the country (South and Southeast); have an average GDP higher than the national average; have a high degree of MHDI, being among the 200 Brazilian municipalities with the highest MHDI; have a very high degree of MHDI-Income, being among the\\n 120 municipalities with the highest MHDI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5276/jswtm/2022.228\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5276/jswtm/2022.228","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
城市固体废物管理(USWM)引入了其核心、技术、指南和标准,以确保废物产生、收集、再利用和处置过程的可持续性。自70年代以来,受生产者行为、消费模式、对环境的影响以及经济、政治和社会转型的影响,涉及USWM的过程发生了变化。尽管将废物重新纳入生产链的必要性似乎是一种共识,但科学调查表明,在管理方向方面存在明显的区域差异。因此,这揭示了一个由设法遵守循环废物管理原则的地区和其他地区组成的情景,特别是中低收入地区,这些地区能够解决收集和最终处置等主要管理过程中固有的问题。文献还指出,技术和财政能力、立法、监管/检查以及社会参与与废物部门有关的讨论和审议等因素决定了USWM的进展或延迟。从这个意义上说,根据调查的当地现实,分析各国、州和/或市的USWM的不同表现,并确定引发这种差异的因素,有必要指出促进USWM发展的挑战和前景。本研究具有描述性和探索性,具有总体目标:分析786个巴西城市的USWM关于废物收集过程的概况,以及城市是否符合国家固体废物政策NSWP(2010年12月30日第12号法律),并讨论可能的外部影响因素。所评估的年份对应于2018年,实证分析涉及城市,这些城市拥有国家卫生信息系统SNIS数据库中可用的所有模型变量。为了优化调查,根据人口将城市划分为集群,并通过8个定性变量(管理类型、生产者付款、城市废物计划、社会控制、监管/检查部门、选择性收集、合作社/协会和最终处置系统)对分析进行参数化,并通过5个定量变量(收集费用、员工人数、车辆数量、收集的城市固体废物量和服务人口)。为了了解外部因素在USWM中的可能影响,在地区层面上对各市镇进行了分析,使用了8个社会经济指标,称为外生变量:市人类发展指数(MHDI)、MHDI收入、人口、密度人口、人均国内生产总值、人均收入,因与卫生条件不足有关的疾病住院的百分比,以及25岁或以上拥有大学学历的人的百分比。市政当局的数据来自以下巴西电子平台:SNIS(2019)、Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística IBGE(2010;2017)和Atlas Brasil(20102017),其理论基础得到了国际科学参考文献和巴西人的支持。所进行的分析使实现以下具体目标成为可能:i.介绍城市固体废物收集过程的现状,以便为未来分析USWM效率提供投入;ii。核实市政当局是否遵守2010年12月30日第12.305/2010号法律的指导方针;iii.根据人口类别、管理类型和发电商的付款,推断市政当局中分析变量的大小;iv.介绍和讨论地区一级市政当局的概况;v.确定更遵守立法标准的市政当局,讨论外部因素的影响。聚类分析显示,在人口最多的城市中,更倾向于符合USWM:(100000至500000居民)和(>500000居民)。Autrarchy和混合经济社会是更倾向于充分性的管理模式,发电商的付款也被认为是USWM充分性的影响变量。在评估的城市总数中,只有5.6%或44个城市与NSWP指南更为一致,其特征如下:91%位于该国最发达的地区(南部和东南部);平均国内生产总值高于全国平均水平;MHDI程度较高,是巴西MHDI最高的200个市镇之一;MHDI收入非常高,是MHDI最高的120个市镇之一。
Analysis of the Solid Urban Waste Management Profile in Brazilian Municipalities
The management of urban solid waste (USWM) brings in its core, techniques, guidelines and standards to ensure the sustainability of the processes of generation, collection, reuse and disposal of waste. Since the 70s, the processes involving the USWM have undergone changes influenced
by the behaviour of the generator, consumption patterns, impacts on the environment and by economic, political and social transformations. Although the need to reinsert waste into the production chain seems to be a consensus, scientific investigations point to clear regional differences in
terms of management direction. As a result, this reveals a scenario composed of regions that managed to adhere to the principles of circular waste management, and others, especially those of medium and low income, which were able to neutralise problems inherent to the primary processes of
management, such as collection and final disposal. Factors such as technical and financial capacity, legislation, regulation/inspection and the involvement of society in the discussions and deliberations related to the waste sector, have also been pointed out by the literature as determining
the dimension of the advance or delay of the USWM. In this sense, the analysis of the different performances of the USWM of the countries, states, and/or municipalities and the identification of the factors that provoke this differentiation, are essential to point out, what the challenges
and perspectives for promoting the advancement of the USWM are, according to the investigated local reality. The present research is descriptive and exploratory and has a general objective: to analyse the profile of the USWM of 786 Brazilian municipalities regarding the waste collection process
and the adequacy of municipalities with the National Solid Waste Policy-NSWP (Law 12.305/ 2010), and discuss possible external factors of influence. The year evaluated corresponds to 2018 and the empirical analyses involved the municipalities which have all the model variables available in
the National Sanitation Information System-SNIS base. For the optimisation of the investigation, the cities were classified into clusters according to the population, and the analyses were parameterised by 8 qualitative variables (Type of Management, Payment of the Generator, Municipal
Waste Plan, Social Control, Regulation/Inspection Sector, Selective Collection, Cooperatives/Associations and Final Disposal System), and by 5 quantitative variables (Collection Expenses, Number of Employees, Number of Vehicles, Volume of Solid Urban Waste Collected and Population Served).
To perceive possible influences of external factors in the USWM, analyses of the municipalities were carried out at regional level, using 8 socioeconomic indicators, called exogenous variables: Municipal Human Development Index (MHDI), MHDI-Income, Population, Density Demographic, Gross Domestic
Product per capita, Income per capita, Percentage of hospitalisations because of diseases related to inadequate sanitation, and Percentage of people of 25 years of age or older with a college degree. Data from the municipalities were extracted from the following Brazilian electronic platforms:
SNIS (2019), Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística-IBGE (2010; 2017) and Atlas Brasil (2010, 2017), and the theoretical foundation was supported by international scientific references and Brazilians. The analyses carried out made it possible to achieve the
following specific objectives: i. present the status of the municipal solid waste collection process in order to provide input for future analysis of the USWM efficiency; ii. verify the adherence of municipalities to the guidelines of Law 12.305/2010; iii. make inferences about the magnitude
of the analysis variables in the municipalities by Population Class, by Management Type and by Payment of the Generator; iv. present and discuss the profile of municipalities at regional level and v. identify the municipalities with greater adherence to the legislation's criteria, discussing
the influence of external factors. Cluster analysis showed a greater tendency to suit the USWM in municipalities belonging to the largest population groups: (100.000 to 500.000 inhabitants) and (>500.000 inhabitants). The Autarchy and the Mixed Economy Society stood out as management models
with a greater tendency towards adequacy and the payment of the generator is also suggested as an influencing variable for the adequacy of the USWM. Of the total number of municipalities evaluated, only 5,6% or 44 showed greater alignment with the NSWP guidelines, having the following profile:
91% are located in the most developed regions of the country (South and Southeast); have an average GDP higher than the national average; have a high degree of MHDI, being among the 200 Brazilian municipalities with the highest MHDI; have a very high degree of MHDI-Income, being among the
120 municipalities with the highest MHDI.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Solid Waste Technology and Management is an international peer-reviewed journal covering landfill, recycling, waste-to-energy, waste reduction, policy and economics, composting, waste collection and transfer, municipal waste, industrial waste, residual waste and other waste management and technology subjects. The Journal is published quarterly (February, May, August, November) by the Widener University School of Engineering. It is supported by a distinguished international editorial board.