{"title":"“很简单,这是一门英语课,因此他们不应该依赖法语文本”","authors":"Caroline Payant, Philippa Bell","doi":"10.1075/ltyl.21004.pay","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the context of additional language (AL) learning, teachers need to focus on the development of language\n proficiency as well as on high-level literacy skills, for example, comprehending and evaluating information and creating new\n meaning. From a plurilingual perspective, AL learners’ first language (L1) is conceputalised as a useful tool in the development of\n target language proficiency; however, limited information exists concerning AL teachers’ beliefs towards the use of the L1 for\n high-level literacy instruction despite its potential utility for complex skill development. The aim of the present exploratory\n study was to examine the beliefs of in-service teachers of English as an additional language (EAL) working in the Quebec primary\n and secondary school system in francophone Canada regarding plurilingual approaches for classroom literacy practices and to\n uncover the factors that influence their beliefs. An online survey was distributed to in-service EAL teachers\n (N = 57) working in the province of Quebec, Canada. Findings suggest that teachers believe that it is most\n beneficial to adopt a monolingual lens to literacy instruction, a belief that denies learners’ use of their L1 and this, in a\n bilingual country. Implications for teacher education programs that challenge a monolingual lens are explored.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Very easy, it’s an English class, therefore they should not rely on a French text”\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Payant, Philippa Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ltyl.21004.pay\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In the context of additional language (AL) learning, teachers need to focus on the development of language\\n proficiency as well as on high-level literacy skills, for example, comprehending and evaluating information and creating new\\n meaning. From a plurilingual perspective, AL learners’ first language (L1) is conceputalised as a useful tool in the development of\\n target language proficiency; however, limited information exists concerning AL teachers’ beliefs towards the use of the L1 for\\n high-level literacy instruction despite its potential utility for complex skill development. The aim of the present exploratory\\n study was to examine the beliefs of in-service teachers of English as an additional language (EAL) working in the Quebec primary\\n and secondary school system in francophone Canada regarding plurilingual approaches for classroom literacy practices and to\\n uncover the factors that influence their beliefs. An online survey was distributed to in-service EAL teachers\\n (N = 57) working in the province of Quebec, Canada. Findings suggest that teachers believe that it is most\\n beneficial to adopt a monolingual lens to literacy instruction, a belief that denies learners’ use of their L1 and this, in a\\n bilingual country. Implications for teacher education programs that challenge a monolingual lens are explored.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.21004.pay\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.21004.pay","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
“Very easy, it’s an English class, therefore they should not rely on a French text”
In the context of additional language (AL) learning, teachers need to focus on the development of language
proficiency as well as on high-level literacy skills, for example, comprehending and evaluating information and creating new
meaning. From a plurilingual perspective, AL learners’ first language (L1) is conceputalised as a useful tool in the development of
target language proficiency; however, limited information exists concerning AL teachers’ beliefs towards the use of the L1 for
high-level literacy instruction despite its potential utility for complex skill development. The aim of the present exploratory
study was to examine the beliefs of in-service teachers of English as an additional language (EAL) working in the Quebec primary
and secondary school system in francophone Canada regarding plurilingual approaches for classroom literacy practices and to
uncover the factors that influence their beliefs. An online survey was distributed to in-service EAL teachers
(N = 57) working in the province of Quebec, Canada. Findings suggest that teachers believe that it is most
beneficial to adopt a monolingual lens to literacy instruction, a belief that denies learners’ use of their L1 and this, in a
bilingual country. Implications for teacher education programs that challenge a monolingual lens are explored.
期刊介绍:
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.