{"title":"古希伯来诗歌有格律吗?","authors":"M. W. Martin","doi":"10.15699/jbl.1403.2021.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The study addresses the much-debated question of whether Hebrew poetic composition is characterized by meter. I examine the question in the light of ancient Greco-Roman literary theory and its reflections on Greek and Latin periodic prose. Greco-Roman theorists chart a spectrum of poetic composition, with ordinary prose on one end, metered poetry on the other, and poetic or \"periodic\" prose occupying a middle ground between the two. I show that (a) Hebrew poetic composition is characterized by the same formal devices as Greco-Roman periodic prose; (b) these devices structure Hebrew poetry into the same periodic literary form seen in Greco-Roman periodic prose; and (c) this form produces the same rhythmic effect as in Greco-Roman periodic prose, one that is natural, not intentionally summoned, and of comparative irregularity. Micah 3:9–12, Wilfred G. E. Watson's alleged \"good illustration\" of \"regular metrical pattern,\" is examined as a case in point.","PeriodicalId":15251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biblical Literature","volume":"140 1","pages":"503 - 529"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Ancient Hebrew Poetry Have Meter?\",\"authors\":\"M. W. Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.15699/jbl.1403.2021.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The study addresses the much-debated question of whether Hebrew poetic composition is characterized by meter. I examine the question in the light of ancient Greco-Roman literary theory and its reflections on Greek and Latin periodic prose. Greco-Roman theorists chart a spectrum of poetic composition, with ordinary prose on one end, metered poetry on the other, and poetic or \\\"periodic\\\" prose occupying a middle ground between the two. I show that (a) Hebrew poetic composition is characterized by the same formal devices as Greco-Roman periodic prose; (b) these devices structure Hebrew poetry into the same periodic literary form seen in Greco-Roman periodic prose; and (c) this form produces the same rhythmic effect as in Greco-Roman periodic prose, one that is natural, not intentionally summoned, and of comparative irregularity. Micah 3:9–12, Wilfred G. E. Watson's alleged \\\"good illustration\\\" of \\\"regular metrical pattern,\\\" is examined as a case in point.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biblical Literature\",\"volume\":\"140 1\",\"pages\":\"503 - 529\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biblical Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15699/jbl.1403.2021.4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biblical Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15699/jbl.1403.2021.4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
摘要:本研究探讨了希伯来语诗歌创作是否以格律为特征这一备受争议的问题。我从古希腊罗马文学理论及其对希腊和拉丁周期性散文的反思的角度来研究这个问题。希腊罗马理论家描绘了诗歌创作的光谱,普通散文在一端,韵律诗在另一端,诗意或“周期性”散文占据两者之间的中间地带。我展示了(a)希伯来诗歌作品的特点是采用与希腊罗马周期性散文相同的形式手法;(b)这些装置将希伯来诗歌结构成与希腊罗马周期性散文相同的周期性文学形式;(c)这种形式产生与希腊罗马周期散文相同的节奏效果,一种自然的,不是故意召唤的,相对不规则的。弥迦书3:9-12,威尔弗雷德·g·e·沃森(Wilfred G. E. Watson)所谓的“有规则的格律模式”的“好例证”,是一个恰当的例子。
Abstract:The study addresses the much-debated question of whether Hebrew poetic composition is characterized by meter. I examine the question in the light of ancient Greco-Roman literary theory and its reflections on Greek and Latin periodic prose. Greco-Roman theorists chart a spectrum of poetic composition, with ordinary prose on one end, metered poetry on the other, and poetic or "periodic" prose occupying a middle ground between the two. I show that (a) Hebrew poetic composition is characterized by the same formal devices as Greco-Roman periodic prose; (b) these devices structure Hebrew poetry into the same periodic literary form seen in Greco-Roman periodic prose; and (c) this form produces the same rhythmic effect as in Greco-Roman periodic prose, one that is natural, not intentionally summoned, and of comparative irregularity. Micah 3:9–12, Wilfred G. E. Watson's alleged "good illustration" of "regular metrical pattern," is examined as a case in point.