确定器官分配最优局部共享方差的优化框架

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Operations Research for Health Care Pub Date : 2020-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.orhc.2019.100242
Mohsen Mohammadi , Vikram Koli , Monica Gentili , Shanthi Muthuswamy
{"title":"确定器官分配最优局部共享方差的优化框架","authors":"Mohsen Mohammadi ,&nbsp;Vikram Koli ,&nbsp;Monica Gentili ,&nbsp;Shanthi Muthuswamy","doi":"10.1016/j.orhc.2019.100242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>One of the main elements affecting the performance of the organ transplantation system is the set of organ allocation boundaries that limits the number of organs shared among regions. To overcome these boundary limits, members of the Organ Procurement Transplant Network - OPTN - (including, transplant hospitals, Organ Procurement Organizations (OPO), medical/scientific members, among others) can propose a variance to the current allocation system to allocate organs differently than the OPTN policies. Over the years, several variances have been enacted by different members for various organs. In this study, we focus on the analysis of sharing variances which allow allocating organs within participating members before offering them at other levels. This type of variance has been successfully implemented in the past. For example, Florida and Tennessee created the Statewide Sharing program whereby kidneys are made available within-state donor service areas before they are made available for regional or national allocation. This program removed geographic </span>disparities within those two states and resulted in better performance of the system in the states. Given these success stories, we propose a multi-period optimization model that can be used to determine the best policy for a local sharing program for any given OPO. We use liver allocation for the GALL OPO (i.e., LifeLink of Georgia) in the state of Georgia (USA) as a test case; however, our approach could be used for a variety of organs in any OPO.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46320,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research for Health Care","volume":"24 ","pages":"Article 100242"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.orhc.2019.100242","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An optimization framework to determine an optimal local sharing variance for organ allocation\",\"authors\":\"Mohsen Mohammadi ,&nbsp;Vikram Koli ,&nbsp;Monica Gentili ,&nbsp;Shanthi Muthuswamy\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.orhc.2019.100242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>One of the main elements affecting the performance of the organ transplantation system is the set of organ allocation boundaries that limits the number of organs shared among regions. To overcome these boundary limits, members of the Organ Procurement Transplant Network - OPTN - (including, transplant hospitals, Organ Procurement Organizations (OPO), medical/scientific members, among others) can propose a variance to the current allocation system to allocate organs differently than the OPTN policies. Over the years, several variances have been enacted by different members for various organs. In this study, we focus on the analysis of sharing variances which allow allocating organs within participating members before offering them at other levels. This type of variance has been successfully implemented in the past. For example, Florida and Tennessee created the Statewide Sharing program whereby kidneys are made available within-state donor service areas before they are made available for regional or national allocation. This program removed geographic </span>disparities within those two states and resulted in better performance of the system in the states. Given these success stories, we propose a multi-period optimization model that can be used to determine the best policy for a local sharing program for any given OPO. We use liver allocation for the GALL OPO (i.e., LifeLink of Georgia) in the state of Georgia (USA) as a test case; however, our approach could be used for a variety of organs in any OPO.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Operations Research for Health Care\",\"volume\":\"24 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100242\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.orhc.2019.100242\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Operations Research for Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211692318301346\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research for Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211692318301346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

影响器官移植系统性能的主要因素之一是器官分配边界,它限制了区域间共享器官的数量。为了克服这些边界限制,器官获取移植网络(OPTN)的成员(包括移植医院、器官获取组织(OPO)、医疗/科学成员等)可以对目前的分配制度提出不同于OPTN政策的器官分配方案。多年来,不同的成员为不同的机构制定了一些差异。在本研究中,我们重点分析了允许在其他级别提供器官之前在参与成员内部分配器官的共享差异。这种类型的变化在过去已经成功地实现了。例如,佛罗里达州和田纳西州创建了全州共享计划,根据该计划,肾脏在提供给地区或全国分配之前,先在州内的捐赠服务区提供。这个项目消除了这两个州之间的地理差异,提高了这两个州的系统性能。鉴于这些成功案例,我们提出了一个多周期优化模型,该模型可用于确定任何给定OPO的本地共享计划的最佳策略。我们使用佐治亚州(美国)的GALL OPO(即佐治亚州LifeLink)的肝脏分配作为测试案例;然而,我们的方法可以用于任何OPO的各种器官。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An optimization framework to determine an optimal local sharing variance for organ allocation

One of the main elements affecting the performance of the organ transplantation system is the set of organ allocation boundaries that limits the number of organs shared among regions. To overcome these boundary limits, members of the Organ Procurement Transplant Network - OPTN - (including, transplant hospitals, Organ Procurement Organizations (OPO), medical/scientific members, among others) can propose a variance to the current allocation system to allocate organs differently than the OPTN policies. Over the years, several variances have been enacted by different members for various organs. In this study, we focus on the analysis of sharing variances which allow allocating organs within participating members before offering them at other levels. This type of variance has been successfully implemented in the past. For example, Florida and Tennessee created the Statewide Sharing program whereby kidneys are made available within-state donor service areas before they are made available for regional or national allocation. This program removed geographic disparities within those two states and resulted in better performance of the system in the states. Given these success stories, we propose a multi-period optimization model that can be used to determine the best policy for a local sharing program for any given OPO. We use liver allocation for the GALL OPO (i.e., LifeLink of Georgia) in the state of Georgia (USA) as a test case; however, our approach could be used for a variety of organs in any OPO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research for Health Care
Operations Research for Health Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Preference-based allocation of patients to nursing homes Balancing continuity of care and home care schedule costs using blueprint routes Outpatient appointment systems: A new heuristic with patient classification A modeling framework for evaluating proactive and reactive nurse rostering strategies — A case study from a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1