{"title":"动词及物性是否影响词联想反应?","authors":"P. Thwaites","doi":"10.1075/ml.20019.thw","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Although several studies have investigated the influence of the grammatical class of cue words on response patterns in the\n word association task, relatively little is known about the influence of more fine-grained distinctions such as cue transitivity. The present study tests two predictions, made in existing studies, of the influence of this variable. The first is that cue\n transitivity would influence the grammatical class of responses; the second, that it would affect the directionality of position-based, or\n syntagmatic, responses. English language associative responses to 49 transitive and 49 intransitive cues were gathered from 53 English L1\n respondents. These responses were then analysed according to their grammatical class and categorical designation. Results suggested that cue\n transitivity influences both of these measurements: transitive cues yielded more noun responses and more associations classified as likely\n to follow the cue in text than did intransitives, while transitives received more verb responses and more associations likely to precede the\n cue. These results are discussed in the light of contiguity-based and semantic theories of the determinants of word association.","PeriodicalId":45215,"journal":{"name":"Mental Lexicon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does verb transitivity influence word association responses?\",\"authors\":\"P. Thwaites\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ml.20019.thw\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Although several studies have investigated the influence of the grammatical class of cue words on response patterns in the\\n word association task, relatively little is known about the influence of more fine-grained distinctions such as cue transitivity. The present study tests two predictions, made in existing studies, of the influence of this variable. The first is that cue\\n transitivity would influence the grammatical class of responses; the second, that it would affect the directionality of position-based, or\\n syntagmatic, responses. English language associative responses to 49 transitive and 49 intransitive cues were gathered from 53 English L1\\n respondents. These responses were then analysed according to their grammatical class and categorical designation. Results suggested that cue\\n transitivity influences both of these measurements: transitive cues yielded more noun responses and more associations classified as likely\\n to follow the cue in text than did intransitives, while transitives received more verb responses and more associations likely to precede the\\n cue. These results are discussed in the light of contiguity-based and semantic theories of the determinants of word association.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental Lexicon\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental Lexicon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20019.thw\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Lexicon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20019.thw","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does verb transitivity influence word association responses?
Although several studies have investigated the influence of the grammatical class of cue words on response patterns in the
word association task, relatively little is known about the influence of more fine-grained distinctions such as cue transitivity. The present study tests two predictions, made in existing studies, of the influence of this variable. The first is that cue
transitivity would influence the grammatical class of responses; the second, that it would affect the directionality of position-based, or
syntagmatic, responses. English language associative responses to 49 transitive and 49 intransitive cues were gathered from 53 English L1
respondents. These responses were then analysed according to their grammatical class and categorical designation. Results suggested that cue
transitivity influences both of these measurements: transitive cues yielded more noun responses and more associations classified as likely
to follow the cue in text than did intransitives, while transitives received more verb responses and more associations likely to precede the
cue. These results are discussed in the light of contiguity-based and semantic theories of the determinants of word association.
期刊介绍:
The Mental Lexicon is an interdisciplinary journal that provides an international forum for research that bears on the issues of the representation and processing of words in the mind and brain. We encourage both the submission of original research and reviews of significant new developments in the understanding of the mental lexicon. The journal publishes work that includes, but is not limited to the following: Models of the representation of words in the mind Computational models of lexical access and production Experimental investigations of lexical processing Neurolinguistic studies of lexical impairment. Functional neuroimaging and lexical representation in the brain Lexical development across the lifespan Lexical processing in second language acquisition The bilingual mental lexicon Lexical and morphological structure across languages Formal models of lexical structure Corpus research on the lexicon New experimental paradigms and statistical techniques for mental lexicon research.