动词及物性是否影响词联想反应?

IF 0.6 Q3 LINGUISTICS Mental Lexicon Pub Date : 2020-12-31 DOI:10.1075/ml.20019.thw
P. Thwaites
{"title":"动词及物性是否影响词联想反应?","authors":"P. Thwaites","doi":"10.1075/ml.20019.thw","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Although several studies have investigated the influence of the grammatical class of cue words on response patterns in the\n word association task, relatively little is known about the influence of more fine-grained distinctions such as cue transitivity. The present study tests two predictions, made in existing studies, of the influence of this variable. The first is that cue\n transitivity would influence the grammatical class of responses; the second, that it would affect the directionality of position-based, or\n syntagmatic, responses. English language associative responses to 49 transitive and 49 intransitive cues were gathered from 53 English L1\n respondents. These responses were then analysed according to their grammatical class and categorical designation. Results suggested that cue\n transitivity influences both of these measurements: transitive cues yielded more noun responses and more associations classified as likely\n to follow the cue in text than did intransitives, while transitives received more verb responses and more associations likely to precede the\n cue. These results are discussed in the light of contiguity-based and semantic theories of the determinants of word association.","PeriodicalId":45215,"journal":{"name":"Mental Lexicon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does verb transitivity influence word association responses?\",\"authors\":\"P. Thwaites\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ml.20019.thw\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Although several studies have investigated the influence of the grammatical class of cue words on response patterns in the\\n word association task, relatively little is known about the influence of more fine-grained distinctions such as cue transitivity. The present study tests two predictions, made in existing studies, of the influence of this variable. The first is that cue\\n transitivity would influence the grammatical class of responses; the second, that it would affect the directionality of position-based, or\\n syntagmatic, responses. English language associative responses to 49 transitive and 49 intransitive cues were gathered from 53 English L1\\n respondents. These responses were then analysed according to their grammatical class and categorical designation. Results suggested that cue\\n transitivity influences both of these measurements: transitive cues yielded more noun responses and more associations classified as likely\\n to follow the cue in text than did intransitives, while transitives received more verb responses and more associations likely to precede the\\n cue. These results are discussed in the light of contiguity-based and semantic theories of the determinants of word association.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mental Lexicon\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mental Lexicon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20019.thw\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental Lexicon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20019.thw","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管有几项研究调查了线索词的语法类别对单词联想任务中的反应模式的影响,但对线索及物性等更细粒度的区别的影响知之甚少。本研究检验了现有研究中对该变量影响的两个预测。第一,提示及物性会影响反应的语法类别;第二,它会影响基于位置或组合的反应的方向性。从53名英语一级受访者中收集了49个及物和49个不及物线索的英语联想反应。然后根据它们的语法类别和分类名称对这些回答进行分析。结果表明,线索传递性影响了这两种测量:与不及物动词相比,传递性线索在文本中产生了更多的名词反应和更多的被归类为可能跟随线索的联想,而传递性线索收到了更多的动词反应和更多可能在线索之前的联想。这些结果是在基于邻接性和语义的单词联想决定因素理论的基础上讨论的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does verb transitivity influence word association responses?
Although several studies have investigated the influence of the grammatical class of cue words on response patterns in the word association task, relatively little is known about the influence of more fine-grained distinctions such as cue transitivity. The present study tests two predictions, made in existing studies, of the influence of this variable. The first is that cue transitivity would influence the grammatical class of responses; the second, that it would affect the directionality of position-based, or syntagmatic, responses. English language associative responses to 49 transitive and 49 intransitive cues were gathered from 53 English L1 respondents. These responses were then analysed according to their grammatical class and categorical designation. Results suggested that cue transitivity influences both of these measurements: transitive cues yielded more noun responses and more associations classified as likely to follow the cue in text than did intransitives, while transitives received more verb responses and more associations likely to precede the cue. These results are discussed in the light of contiguity-based and semantic theories of the determinants of word association.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mental Lexicon
Mental Lexicon LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: The Mental Lexicon is an interdisciplinary journal that provides an international forum for research that bears on the issues of the representation and processing of words in the mind and brain. We encourage both the submission of original research and reviews of significant new developments in the understanding of the mental lexicon. The journal publishes work that includes, but is not limited to the following: Models of the representation of words in the mind Computational models of lexical access and production Experimental investigations of lexical processing Neurolinguistic studies of lexical impairment. Functional neuroimaging and lexical representation in the brain Lexical development across the lifespan Lexical processing in second language acquisition The bilingual mental lexicon Lexical and morphological structure across languages Formal models of lexical structure Corpus research on the lexicon New experimental paradigms and statistical techniques for mental lexicon research.
期刊最新文献
Explorations of morphological structure in distributional space Long-lag repetition priming in natural text reading Native and foreign language orthotactic probability and neighborhood density in word learning The cognate continuum Mimetic Reading of J.K. Rowling’s The Casual Vacancy: A Political Critique of the United Kingdom’s 2010 General Election Through the Analysis of Children Characters’ Sufferings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1