印度与中国的RCEP困境:超越法律文本*

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 Q2 AREA STUDIES Pacific Focus Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI:10.1111/PAFO.12180
Chao Wang, Vinay Sharma
{"title":"印度与中国的RCEP困境:超越法律文本*","authors":"Chao Wang, Vinay Sharma","doi":"10.1111/PAFO.12180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ASEAN-inaugurated Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) was eventually concluded on 15 November 2020 after 8 years of tough negotiations India was counted as an important member of the RCEP, but it chose to back out when other members were finalizing the RCEP legal text This article critically analyzes the relevant legal provisions leading to India's withdrawal from this significant mega trade deal, the reasons behind India's refusal of those provisions, the possibility of isolationism India might face, and geopolitical changes in Sino–India relations post stand-off on the Galwan Valley as well as the COVID-19 pandemic It argues that unbalanced economic relations, India's self-reliant ideology, as well as China's growing hegemony in the Asia-Pacific region are among the principle factors for India to back out from the RCEP However, the door to participate in the future remains open for India © 2021 Center for International Studies, Inha University","PeriodicalId":19923,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Focus","volume":"36 1","pages":"40-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/PAFO.12180","citationCount":"15","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"India's RCEP Dilemma with China: Beyond the Legal Texts*\",\"authors\":\"Chao Wang, Vinay Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/PAFO.12180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ASEAN-inaugurated Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) was eventually concluded on 15 November 2020 after 8 years of tough negotiations India was counted as an important member of the RCEP, but it chose to back out when other members were finalizing the RCEP legal text This article critically analyzes the relevant legal provisions leading to India's withdrawal from this significant mega trade deal, the reasons behind India's refusal of those provisions, the possibility of isolationism India might face, and geopolitical changes in Sino–India relations post stand-off on the Galwan Valley as well as the COVID-19 pandemic It argues that unbalanced economic relations, India's self-reliant ideology, as well as China's growing hegemony in the Asia-Pacific region are among the principle factors for India to back out from the RCEP However, the door to participate in the future remains open for India © 2021 Center for International Studies, Inha University\",\"PeriodicalId\":19923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacific Focus\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"40-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/PAFO.12180\",\"citationCount\":\"15\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacific Focus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/PAFO.12180\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Focus","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/PAFO.12180","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

摘要

经过8年的艰苦谈判,东盟发起的区域全面经济伙伴关系(RCEP)最终于2020年11月15日达成,印度被视为RCEP的重要成员,但在其他成员敲定RCEP法律文本时,印度选择退出。本文批判性地分析了导致印度退出这一重要的大型贸易协定的相关法律条款,以及印度拒绝这些条款背后的原因。文章认为,不平衡的经济关系、印度自力更生的意识形态以及中国在亚太地区日益增长的霸权是印度退出RCEP的主要因素。然而,印度参与RCEP的大门仍为印度敞开©2021国际研究中心,韩国仁荷大学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
India's RCEP Dilemma with China: Beyond the Legal Texts*
The ASEAN-inaugurated Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) was eventually concluded on 15 November 2020 after 8 years of tough negotiations India was counted as an important member of the RCEP, but it chose to back out when other members were finalizing the RCEP legal text This article critically analyzes the relevant legal provisions leading to India's withdrawal from this significant mega trade deal, the reasons behind India's refusal of those provisions, the possibility of isolationism India might face, and geopolitical changes in Sino–India relations post stand-off on the Galwan Valley as well as the COVID-19 pandemic It argues that unbalanced economic relations, India's self-reliant ideology, as well as China's growing hegemony in the Asia-Pacific region are among the principle factors for India to back out from the RCEP However, the door to participate in the future remains open for India © 2021 Center for International Studies, Inha University
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pacific Focus
Pacific Focus Multiple-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: Pacific Focus is published on behalf of the Center for International Studies, Inha University, South Korea. The Journal is a peer-reviewed and indexed and abstracted in the Social Sciences Citation Index, Social Scisearch, Journal Citation Reports/Social Sciences Edition. Pacific Focus" scope encompasses the wide range of research interests concerning the Asia-Pacific, including: - security - regionalism - environment - migration - civil society - multi-culturalism
期刊最新文献
Navigating Middle Eastern Disputes: The “Two‐Goods” Approach of China's Constructive Intervention* The Right to Food and Responsibility to Protect in North Korea: In the Face of Food Availability Decline and Food Entitlement Decline* Navigating Geopolitical Change in Northeast Asia: A Realist Approach to Analyze the Matrix Scenario of US‐China Conflict and US–North Korea Relations Under What Conditions Would South Korea Go Nuclear? Seoul's Strategic Choice on Nuclear Weapons Nexus of Strong Presidentialism and Philippine Foreign Policy: The Case of the Duterte Presidency's Hedging toward China*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1