编辑前言

IF 0.5 0 RELIGION Reformation Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/13574175.2023.2187926
M. Rankin
{"title":"编辑前言","authors":"M. Rankin","doi":"10.1080/13574175.2023.2187926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present issue offers a tribute to the scholarship of John N. King (1945-2020), former editor of Reformation (2006-2009). It opens with two pieces, by Arthur Marotti and Mark Bayer, on Shakespeare’s response to the ethical and political ideas of the Reformation. Although King did not consider himself to be a Shakespearean, he cultivated an interest across his career in the effect of the Reformation on Shakespeare’s plays. According to King, “[t]hat Shakespeare joined his contemporaries in restaging many theatrical encounters between kings and satirical embodiments of papal power demonstrates that memories of the conflict between ecclesiastical and secular authority long outlived the generations who came of age during the many religious crises that occurred between the 1534 Reformation Parliament and the Elizabethan settlement of religion in 1559.” In crafting his history plays, King argues, Shakespeare was sensitive to “the regal vices of pride, extravagance, and licentiousness” which could be mitigated via royal counsel, a “problem” “raised by works ranging from Utopia to 1 Henry IV.” Because “[t]he Italianate settings of Jacobean plays inherit a polemical Protestant edge,” “Shakespeare and his successors recreate the Reformation image of Italy in such plays as Othello, Volpone, and The Duchess of Malfi.” With characteristic erudition, King locates an analogous use of Othello’s abusive epithet “goats and monkeys,” which Othello hurls at Desdemona, in the mid-Tudor satirist William Baldwin’s translation of Matthias Flaccius’s Wonderfull newes of the death of Paule the. iii. last byshop of Rome (c. 1552). King’s point is not that Shakespeare necessarily read Flaccius, but that his dramas were unmistakably a product of Reformation literary culture. Mandated official homilies read weekly from most pulpits during Elizabeth’s reign “enables one to read these texts as a summary of the world view of Sidney and Spenser, Shakespeare and Donne,” according to King. This assertion leads him to identify “commonplaces from the homily on obedience” in Ulysses’ speech on order and degree, from Troilus and Cressida.” Reformation literary voices “helped to spawn masterworks by William Shakespeare.” “[P]lays such as Hamlet and Othello dramatize controversial issues related to conscience, confession, free will, and purgatory....Dramatization of","PeriodicalId":41682,"journal":{"name":"Reformation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editor’s Preface\",\"authors\":\"M. Rankin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13574175.2023.2187926\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present issue offers a tribute to the scholarship of John N. King (1945-2020), former editor of Reformation (2006-2009). It opens with two pieces, by Arthur Marotti and Mark Bayer, on Shakespeare’s response to the ethical and political ideas of the Reformation. Although King did not consider himself to be a Shakespearean, he cultivated an interest across his career in the effect of the Reformation on Shakespeare’s plays. According to King, “[t]hat Shakespeare joined his contemporaries in restaging many theatrical encounters between kings and satirical embodiments of papal power demonstrates that memories of the conflict between ecclesiastical and secular authority long outlived the generations who came of age during the many religious crises that occurred between the 1534 Reformation Parliament and the Elizabethan settlement of religion in 1559.” In crafting his history plays, King argues, Shakespeare was sensitive to “the regal vices of pride, extravagance, and licentiousness” which could be mitigated via royal counsel, a “problem” “raised by works ranging from Utopia to 1 Henry IV.” Because “[t]he Italianate settings of Jacobean plays inherit a polemical Protestant edge,” “Shakespeare and his successors recreate the Reformation image of Italy in such plays as Othello, Volpone, and The Duchess of Malfi.” With characteristic erudition, King locates an analogous use of Othello’s abusive epithet “goats and monkeys,” which Othello hurls at Desdemona, in the mid-Tudor satirist William Baldwin’s translation of Matthias Flaccius’s Wonderfull newes of the death of Paule the. iii. last byshop of Rome (c. 1552). King’s point is not that Shakespeare necessarily read Flaccius, but that his dramas were unmistakably a product of Reformation literary culture. Mandated official homilies read weekly from most pulpits during Elizabeth’s reign “enables one to read these texts as a summary of the world view of Sidney and Spenser, Shakespeare and Donne,” according to King. This assertion leads him to identify “commonplaces from the homily on obedience” in Ulysses’ speech on order and degree, from Troilus and Cressida.” Reformation literary voices “helped to spawn masterworks by William Shakespeare.” “[P]lays such as Hamlet and Othello dramatize controversial issues related to conscience, confession, free will, and purgatory....Dramatization of\",\"PeriodicalId\":41682,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reformation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reformation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13574175.2023.2187926\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13574175.2023.2187926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本期向《宗教改革》杂志前编辑约翰·N·金(1945-2020)(2006-2009)的学术成就致敬。它以亚瑟·马罗蒂和马克·拜尔的两篇作品开场,讲述了莎士比亚对宗教改革的伦理和政治思想的回应。尽管金并不认为自己是莎士比亚,但他在整个职业生涯中都对宗教改革对莎士比亚戏剧的影响产生了兴趣。根据King的说法,“[t]莎士比亚和他的同时代人一起,重述了国王之间的许多戏剧遭遇和教皇权力的讽刺体现,这表明,对教会和世俗权威之间冲突的记忆比1534年宗教改革议会和伊丽莎白时代1559年的宗教。”金认为,在创作历史剧时,莎士比亚对“傲慢、奢侈和放荡的帝王恶习”很敏感,这可以通过王室顾问来减轻,从《乌托邦》到《亨利四世》等作品都提出了一个“问题”。因为“雅各宾戏剧的意大利背景继承了新教的论战边缘”,“莎士比亚和他的继任者在《奥赛罗》、《沃尔波内》和《马尔菲公爵夫人》等戏剧中重现了意大利的宗教改革形象。”,King在都铎王朝中期讽刺作家William Baldwin翻译的Matthias Flaccius的《保罗之死》中找到了奥赛罗辱骂苔丝狄蒙娜的绰号“山羊和猴子”的类似用法。iii.罗马最后一次比绍(约1552年)。金的观点并不是说莎士比亚一定读过弗拉修斯,而是说他的戏剧无疑是宗教改革文学文化的产物。金表示,伊丽莎白统治期间,大多数讲坛每周都会宣读强制性的官方布道,“这使人们能够将这些文本作为西德尼和斯宾塞、莎士比亚和多恩世界观的总结来阅读”。这一论断使他从尤利西斯关于秩序和程度的演讲中,从特洛伊洛斯和克雷斯达那里,找到了“关于服从的说教的共同点”宗教改革派的文学声音“帮助催生了威廉·莎士比亚的杰作。”《哈姆雷特》和《奥赛罗》等戏剧将与良心、忏悔、自由意志和炼狱有关的争议问题戏剧化
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Editor’s Preface
The present issue offers a tribute to the scholarship of John N. King (1945-2020), former editor of Reformation (2006-2009). It opens with two pieces, by Arthur Marotti and Mark Bayer, on Shakespeare’s response to the ethical and political ideas of the Reformation. Although King did not consider himself to be a Shakespearean, he cultivated an interest across his career in the effect of the Reformation on Shakespeare’s plays. According to King, “[t]hat Shakespeare joined his contemporaries in restaging many theatrical encounters between kings and satirical embodiments of papal power demonstrates that memories of the conflict between ecclesiastical and secular authority long outlived the generations who came of age during the many religious crises that occurred between the 1534 Reformation Parliament and the Elizabethan settlement of religion in 1559.” In crafting his history plays, King argues, Shakespeare was sensitive to “the regal vices of pride, extravagance, and licentiousness” which could be mitigated via royal counsel, a “problem” “raised by works ranging from Utopia to 1 Henry IV.” Because “[t]he Italianate settings of Jacobean plays inherit a polemical Protestant edge,” “Shakespeare and his successors recreate the Reformation image of Italy in such plays as Othello, Volpone, and The Duchess of Malfi.” With characteristic erudition, King locates an analogous use of Othello’s abusive epithet “goats and monkeys,” which Othello hurls at Desdemona, in the mid-Tudor satirist William Baldwin’s translation of Matthias Flaccius’s Wonderfull newes of the death of Paule the. iii. last byshop of Rome (c. 1552). King’s point is not that Shakespeare necessarily read Flaccius, but that his dramas were unmistakably a product of Reformation literary culture. Mandated official homilies read weekly from most pulpits during Elizabeth’s reign “enables one to read these texts as a summary of the world view of Sidney and Spenser, Shakespeare and Donne,” according to King. This assertion leads him to identify “commonplaces from the homily on obedience” in Ulysses’ speech on order and degree, from Troilus and Cressida.” Reformation literary voices “helped to spawn masterworks by William Shakespeare.” “[P]lays such as Hamlet and Othello dramatize controversial issues related to conscience, confession, free will, and purgatory....Dramatization of
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reformation
Reformation RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Christian identity, piety, and politics in early modern England How the English Reformation was named: the politics of history, c. 1400–1700 Thomas More and the Taking of William Tyndale The Imperial Cities and Imperial Reform in Late Medieval and Early Reformation Germany, 1410–1532 Thomas Norton’s Meditation of a Penitent Sinner
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1