制裁或不制裁:执行自由贸易协定中的劳工条款

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Trade and Customs Journal Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.54648/gtcj2022045
Shiny Pradeep, Achyuth A
{"title":"制裁或不制裁:执行自由贸易协定中的劳工条款","authors":"Shiny Pradeep, Achyuth A","doi":"10.54648/gtcj2022045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The inclusion of labour provisions in trade agreements which commenced with the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in the 1990s and other developed countries such as Canada and the EU saw the reaffirmation and implementation of commitments undertaken as part of the International Labour Organization (ILO) Conventions that these countries have ratified – with specific emphasis on respecting, promoting and realizing the core labour standards.\nWhile the general commitments and the nature of labour standards included in different agreements are largely similar, the approaches to enforce these standards under various agreements have differed widely. While the major developed economies (US, Canada and the EU) all include substantive labour provisions in their trade agreements as a standard practice now, their approaches to enforcement of these provisions are strikingly different (with US-Canada approach largely similar). These two contrasting approaches are – (1) that entails a possibility of monetary assessment, countermeasures or suspension of preferential benefits (sanctions based) and (2) that is based exclusively on recommendations and directions by a Panel of Experts as part of the dispute resolution process without any possibility of economic assessment (non-sanctions-based). This article provides an overview of these two main approaches towards enforcement of labour provisions in trade agreements.\nIn light of the recent emphasis placed on including stronger enforcement mechanisms within the Free Trade Agreements (FTAs’) on sustainability, specifically in the EU this article examines the two approaches and highlights the approach which would be better suited for enforcing labour standards.\nLabour Standards, occupational safety and health, TSD, Dispute Settlement, Enforcement, NAFTA, NAALC, USMCA, Labour Provisions in FTAs’, Rapid Response Labour Mechanism, ILO Conventions, EU-Korea Labour Dispute, countermeasures, monetary assessment, suspension of benefits.","PeriodicalId":12728,"journal":{"name":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sanctions or No Sanctions: Enforcing Labour Provisions in Free Trade Agreements\",\"authors\":\"Shiny Pradeep, Achyuth A\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/gtcj2022045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The inclusion of labour provisions in trade agreements which commenced with the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in the 1990s and other developed countries such as Canada and the EU saw the reaffirmation and implementation of commitments undertaken as part of the International Labour Organization (ILO) Conventions that these countries have ratified – with specific emphasis on respecting, promoting and realizing the core labour standards.\\nWhile the general commitments and the nature of labour standards included in different agreements are largely similar, the approaches to enforce these standards under various agreements have differed widely. While the major developed economies (US, Canada and the EU) all include substantive labour provisions in their trade agreements as a standard practice now, their approaches to enforcement of these provisions are strikingly different (with US-Canada approach largely similar). These two contrasting approaches are – (1) that entails a possibility of monetary assessment, countermeasures or suspension of preferential benefits (sanctions based) and (2) that is based exclusively on recommendations and directions by a Panel of Experts as part of the dispute resolution process without any possibility of economic assessment (non-sanctions-based). This article provides an overview of these two main approaches towards enforcement of labour provisions in trade agreements.\\nIn light of the recent emphasis placed on including stronger enforcement mechanisms within the Free Trade Agreements (FTAs’) on sustainability, specifically in the EU this article examines the two approaches and highlights the approach which would be better suited for enforcing labour standards.\\nLabour Standards, occupational safety and health, TSD, Dispute Settlement, Enforcement, NAFTA, NAALC, USMCA, Labour Provisions in FTAs’, Rapid Response Labour Mechanism, ILO Conventions, EU-Korea Labour Dispute, countermeasures, monetary assessment, suspension of benefits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Trade and Customs Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Trade and Customs Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2022045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Trade and Customs Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2022045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自1990年代北美自由贸易协定(北美自由贸易协定)和加拿大和欧盟等其他发达国家开始将劳工条款列入贸易协定,这些国家重申和执行了作为这些国家批准的国际劳工组织(劳工组织)各项公约的一部分所作的承诺,特别强调尊重、促进和实现核心劳工标准。虽然不同协定所载的一般承诺和劳工标准的性质在很大程度上是相似的,但在不同协定下执行这些标准的方法却大不相同。虽然主要发达经济体(美国、加拿大和欧盟)现在都在其贸易协定中纳入了实质性的劳工条款,作为标准做法,但它们执行这些条款的方法却截然不同(美国和加拿大的方法基本相似)。这两种截然不同的方法是:(1)可能需要进行货币评估、反措施或暂停优惠待遇(以制裁为基础);(2)完全基于专家小组作为争端解决程序一部分的建议和指示,而不可能进行经济评估(不以制裁为基础)。本文概述了在贸易协定中执行劳工条款的这两种主要方法。鉴于最近强调在自由贸易协定(FTAs)中包括更强有力的可持续性执行机制,特别是在欧盟,本文研究了这两种方法,并强调了更适合执行劳工标准的方法。劳工标准,职业安全与健康,TSD,争端解决,执法,NAFTA, NAALC, USMCA, fta中的劳工条款,快速反应劳工机制,ILO公约,EU-Korea劳资纠纷,对策,货币评估,暂停福利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sanctions or No Sanctions: Enforcing Labour Provisions in Free Trade Agreements
The inclusion of labour provisions in trade agreements which commenced with the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in the 1990s and other developed countries such as Canada and the EU saw the reaffirmation and implementation of commitments undertaken as part of the International Labour Organization (ILO) Conventions that these countries have ratified – with specific emphasis on respecting, promoting and realizing the core labour standards. While the general commitments and the nature of labour standards included in different agreements are largely similar, the approaches to enforce these standards under various agreements have differed widely. While the major developed economies (US, Canada and the EU) all include substantive labour provisions in their trade agreements as a standard practice now, their approaches to enforcement of these provisions are strikingly different (with US-Canada approach largely similar). These two contrasting approaches are – (1) that entails a possibility of monetary assessment, countermeasures or suspension of preferential benefits (sanctions based) and (2) that is based exclusively on recommendations and directions by a Panel of Experts as part of the dispute resolution process without any possibility of economic assessment (non-sanctions-based). This article provides an overview of these two main approaches towards enforcement of labour provisions in trade agreements. In light of the recent emphasis placed on including stronger enforcement mechanisms within the Free Trade Agreements (FTAs’) on sustainability, specifically in the EU this article examines the two approaches and highlights the approach which would be better suited for enforcing labour standards. Labour Standards, occupational safety and health, TSD, Dispute Settlement, Enforcement, NAFTA, NAALC, USMCA, Labour Provisions in FTAs’, Rapid Response Labour Mechanism, ILO Conventions, EU-Korea Labour Dispute, countermeasures, monetary assessment, suspension of benefits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Trade and Customs Journal
Global Trade and Customs Journal INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Analysis Of The Foreign Subsidies Regulation From An International Trade Law Perspective On Trade In Goods Robotics Process Automation (RPA) And The Import/Export Customs Declaration Process Tackling Cross-Border Subsidies in the EU: The Need to Build on a Promising Start Part 1 The Foreign Subsidies Regulation of the European Union: A New Instrument Levelling the Playing Field? Digitalization in Global Trade: Opportunities and Challenges for Investment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1