通过人为因素和临床协作进行使用相关风险分析的最佳实践

H. M. Mehrzad, T. Stüdeli, Helene Quie
{"title":"通过人为因素和临床协作进行使用相关风险分析的最佳实践","authors":"H. M. Mehrzad, T. Stüdeli, Helene Quie","doi":"10.1177/2327857923121044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Integrating the human factors engineering (HFE) process, and its user-centered approach, into the medical device and combination Product and Development Process (PDP), has been an ongoing challenge for its respective industries and Human Factors (HF) practitioners within it for decades. Yet, despite continuous process adaptation and evolution of the HFE process, as well as the introduction of standards and health authority guidelines, the early integration of a risk-based and user-centered approach within the development and design process remains an ongoing practical challenge occupying the minds of most. With the introduction of the European MDR 2017/745 in 2017, an additional emphasis was put on the importance of use-related risk identification, assessment, and data based evaluation within the clinical evaluation process, and with such introduces clinical teams to (new) ‘use-related risk challenges’ as well. This paper provides a framework for early integration of an iterative use-related risk analysis approach, addressing common practical challenges, and providing best practices for such. Furthermore, it highlights how applying a collaborative approach between HF and clinical efforts would permit for collection of more robust use-related data sets, thus potentially optimizing use-related risk, residual risk, and risk-benefit analyses and their processes.","PeriodicalId":74550,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","volume":"12 1","pages":"194 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Best Practices for Use-Related Risk Analysis Through Collaboration of Human Factors and Clinical\",\"authors\":\"H. M. Mehrzad, T. Stüdeli, Helene Quie\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/2327857923121044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Integrating the human factors engineering (HFE) process, and its user-centered approach, into the medical device and combination Product and Development Process (PDP), has been an ongoing challenge for its respective industries and Human Factors (HF) practitioners within it for decades. Yet, despite continuous process adaptation and evolution of the HFE process, as well as the introduction of standards and health authority guidelines, the early integration of a risk-based and user-centered approach within the development and design process remains an ongoing practical challenge occupying the minds of most. With the introduction of the European MDR 2017/745 in 2017, an additional emphasis was put on the importance of use-related risk identification, assessment, and data based evaluation within the clinical evaluation process, and with such introduces clinical teams to (new) ‘use-related risk challenges’ as well. This paper provides a framework for early integration of an iterative use-related risk analysis approach, addressing common practical challenges, and providing best practices for such. Furthermore, it highlights how applying a collaborative approach between HF and clinical efforts would permit for collection of more robust use-related data sets, thus potentially optimizing use-related risk, residual risk, and risk-benefit analyses and their processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"194 - 199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857923121044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857923121044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

几十年来,将人因工程(HFE)过程及其以用户为中心的方法集成到医疗设备和组合产品与开发过程(PDP)中,一直是其各自行业和其中的人因(HF)从业者面临的持续挑战。然而,尽管HFE过程不断进行过程调整和演变,并引入了标准和卫生当局指南,但在开发和设计过程中尽早整合基于风险和以用户为中心的方法仍然是大多数人心中持续存在的实际挑战。随着2017年欧洲MDR 2017/745的推出,在临床评估过程中,进一步强调了使用相关风险识别、评估和基于数据的评估的重要性,并向临床团队介绍了(新的)“使用相关风险挑战”。本文为迭代使用相关风险分析方法的早期集成提供了一个框架,解决了常见的实际挑战,并为此提供了最佳实践。此外,它强调了在HF和临床工作之间应用协作方法将如何允许收集更稳健的与使用相关的数据集,从而潜在地优化与使用相关风险、剩余风险和风险收益分析及其过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Best Practices for Use-Related Risk Analysis Through Collaboration of Human Factors and Clinical
Integrating the human factors engineering (HFE) process, and its user-centered approach, into the medical device and combination Product and Development Process (PDP), has been an ongoing challenge for its respective industries and Human Factors (HF) practitioners within it for decades. Yet, despite continuous process adaptation and evolution of the HFE process, as well as the introduction of standards and health authority guidelines, the early integration of a risk-based and user-centered approach within the development and design process remains an ongoing practical challenge occupying the minds of most. With the introduction of the European MDR 2017/745 in 2017, an additional emphasis was put on the importance of use-related risk identification, assessment, and data based evaluation within the clinical evaluation process, and with such introduces clinical teams to (new) ‘use-related risk challenges’ as well. This paper provides a framework for early integration of an iterative use-related risk analysis approach, addressing common practical challenges, and providing best practices for such. Furthermore, it highlights how applying a collaborative approach between HF and clinical efforts would permit for collection of more robust use-related data sets, thus potentially optimizing use-related risk, residual risk, and risk-benefit analyses and their processes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CHARACTERIZING PHYSICAL STRAIN IN NON-ROUTINIZED CLINICAL WORK THROUGH OBSERVATION: AN EXAMPLE OF ORAL HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS. Toward Joint Activity Design: Augmenting User-Centered Design with Heuristics for Supporting Joint Activity. Cracking The Code: Redesigning EHR Interfaces to Clarify Patients’ End of Life Wishes for Code Situations Considering Team Dynamics during Human Factors Work in Healthcare Preventing Hospital-Acquired Venous Thrombosis Embolism in Medical Patients Admitted to Acute Care Hospitals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1