COVID-19紧急状态下护士的适应性、凝聚力和家庭功能

Sílvia Manuela Dias Tavares da Silva, C. Fernandes, Bruno M. Magalhães, Beatriz Edra
{"title":"COVID-19紧急状态下护士的适应性、凝聚力和家庭功能","authors":"Sílvia Manuela Dias Tavares da Silva, C. Fernandes, Bruno M. Magalhães, Beatriz Edra","doi":"10.15446/av.enferm.v39n1supl.98633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate nurses’ family adaptability, cohesion, and functionality during the state of emergency.\nMaterials and method: The following is an exploratory, quantitative, descriptive, and cross-sectional study. We used a snowball sample, non-probabilistic, and for convenience. For data collection, we used an instrument consisting of a sociodemographic questionnaire; a family, housing, and cohabitation characterization questionnaire; a Duvall’s Family Life Cycle Assessment Scale; a Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale (FACES II); and Family-Scale Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve (APGAR) that measures family function.\nResults: 125 responses were obtained, being identified the following aspects as predictors of better APGAR, Cohesion, and Adaptability: better housing conditions; families with three or more members; mature families, with children or adult children; individuals teleworking and households in which no more than one member is socially isolated. Age is a predictor of lower adaptability and cohesion.\nConclusions: Twenty percent of families (APGAR) have moderate or severe dysfunction; 4.8 % are classified as “extreme” families, and 39.2 % as “very balanced” (FACES II), therefore being at risk.","PeriodicalId":30347,"journal":{"name":"Avances en Enfermeria","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptability, cohesion and family functionality of nurses during state of emergency by COVID-19\",\"authors\":\"Sílvia Manuela Dias Tavares da Silva, C. Fernandes, Bruno M. Magalhães, Beatriz Edra\",\"doi\":\"10.15446/av.enferm.v39n1supl.98633\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To evaluate nurses’ family adaptability, cohesion, and functionality during the state of emergency.\\nMaterials and method: The following is an exploratory, quantitative, descriptive, and cross-sectional study. We used a snowball sample, non-probabilistic, and for convenience. For data collection, we used an instrument consisting of a sociodemographic questionnaire; a family, housing, and cohabitation characterization questionnaire; a Duvall’s Family Life Cycle Assessment Scale; a Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale (FACES II); and Family-Scale Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve (APGAR) that measures family function.\\nResults: 125 responses were obtained, being identified the following aspects as predictors of better APGAR, Cohesion, and Adaptability: better housing conditions; families with three or more members; mature families, with children or adult children; individuals teleworking and households in which no more than one member is socially isolated. Age is a predictor of lower adaptability and cohesion.\\nConclusions: Twenty percent of families (APGAR) have moderate or severe dysfunction; 4.8 % are classified as “extreme” families, and 39.2 % as “very balanced” (FACES II), therefore being at risk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Avances en Enfermeria\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Avances en Enfermeria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15446/av.enferm.v39n1supl.98633\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avances en Enfermeria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/av.enferm.v39n1supl.98633","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估护士在紧急状态下的家庭适应能力、凝聚力和功能。材料和方法:以下是一项探索性、定量、描述性和横断面研究。为了方便起见,我们使用了非概率的雪球样本。在数据收集方面,我们使用了一种由社会人口调查问卷组成的工具;家庭、住房和同居特征调查表;杜瓦尔家庭生命周期评估量表;家庭适应性和凝聚力评估量表(FACES II);以及衡量家庭功能的家庭适应、伙伴关系、成长、情感和决心(APGAR)。结果:获得了125个回答,被确定为更好的APGAR、凝聚力和适应性的预测因素:更好的住房条件;有三个或三个以上成员的家庭;有子女或成年子女的成熟家庭;远程工作的个人和不超过一名成员处于社会孤立状态的家庭。年龄是适应性和凝聚力降低的预测因素。结论:20%的家庭(APGAR)有中度或重度功能障碍;4.8%的家庭被归类为“极端”家庭,39.2%的家庭被分类为“非常平衡”(FACES II),因此处于危险之中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adaptability, cohesion and family functionality of nurses during state of emergency by COVID-19
Objective: To evaluate nurses’ family adaptability, cohesion, and functionality during the state of emergency. Materials and method: The following is an exploratory, quantitative, descriptive, and cross-sectional study. We used a snowball sample, non-probabilistic, and for convenience. For data collection, we used an instrument consisting of a sociodemographic questionnaire; a family, housing, and cohabitation characterization questionnaire; a Duvall’s Family Life Cycle Assessment Scale; a Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scale (FACES II); and Family-Scale Adaptation, Partnership, Growth, Affection, and Resolve (APGAR) that measures family function. Results: 125 responses were obtained, being identified the following aspects as predictors of better APGAR, Cohesion, and Adaptability: better housing conditions; families with three or more members; mature families, with children or adult children; individuals teleworking and households in which no more than one member is socially isolated. Age is a predictor of lower adaptability and cohesion. Conclusions: Twenty percent of families (APGAR) have moderate or severe dysfunction; 4.8 % are classified as “extreme” families, and 39.2 % as “very balanced” (FACES II), therefore being at risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Vitimização por bullying e senso de comunidade escolar: prevalência e fatores associados Validez y confiabilidad del instrumento Adopción del rol de cuidador con uso de medicamentos Propiedades psicométricas del Índice de Bienestar General en mujeres gestantes colombianas Manejo da hipertensão gestacional no pré-natal: validação de cenário para a simulação clínica Cuidando la sexualidad desde lo comunicacional: teoría fundamentada constructivista
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1