女权主义的伊斯兰恐惧症:V.S.奈保尔游记和丹尼尔·派普斯的《历史》对穆斯林女性的表现

IF 0.4 0 RELIGION Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs Pub Date : 2021-10-02 DOI:10.1080/13602004.2022.2029013

M. Habibullah

{"title":"女权主义的伊斯兰恐惧症:V.S.奈保尔游记和丹尼尔·派普斯的《历史》对穆斯林女性的表现","authors":"M. Habibullah","doi":"10.1080/13602004.2022.2029013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract When feminism is co-opted to caricature Islam and Muslim men as patriarchal and oppressive to women, it may cause Islamophobia. This interrelation between feminism and Islamophobia can be called ‘Feministic Islamophobia'. Such Islamophobia is reflected in V. S. Naipaul's travelogues – “Among the Believers: An Islamic Journey” (1981) and “Beyond Belief: Islamic Excursions among the Converted Peoples” (1998). An advocate of these travelogues Daniel Pipes (1949- ) wrote an Islamic history – In the Path of God: Islam and Political Power (1983) – that, like Naipaulian travelogues, represents feministic Islamophobia. This article argues that the co-opted feminism of both Naipaul's travelogues and Pipes’ history causes feministic Islamophobia that is one of the causes of intertextual dynamic between their texts.","PeriodicalId":45523,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs","volume":"41 1","pages":"669 - 684"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feministic Islamophobia: Representation of Muslim Women in V.S. Naipaul’s Travelogues and Daniel Pipes’ History\",\"authors\":\"M. Habibullah\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13602004.2022.2029013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract When feminism is co-opted to caricature Islam and Muslim men as patriarchal and oppressive to women, it may cause Islamophobia. This interrelation between feminism and Islamophobia can be called ‘Feministic Islamophobia'. Such Islamophobia is reflected in V. S. Naipaul's travelogues – “Among the Believers: An Islamic Journey” (1981) and “Beyond Belief: Islamic Excursions among the Converted Peoples” (1998). An advocate of these travelogues Daniel Pipes (1949- ) wrote an Islamic history – In the Path of God: Islam and Political Power (1983) – that, like Naipaulian travelogues, represents feministic Islamophobia. This article argues that the co-opted feminism of both Naipaul's travelogues and Pipes’ history causes feministic Islamophobia that is one of the causes of intertextual dynamic between their texts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"669 - 684\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2022.2029013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13602004.2022.2029013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

当女权主义被用来讽刺伊斯兰教和穆斯林男性对女性的父权和压迫时，可能会引起伊斯兰恐惧症。女权主义和伊斯兰恐惧症之间的这种相互关系可以被称为“女性主义的伊斯兰恐惧症”。这种对伊斯兰教的恐惧反映在奈保尔的游记中——《在信众中:一次伊斯兰之旅》(1981)和《超越信仰:皈依者中的伊斯兰之旅》(1998)。这些游记的倡导者丹尼尔·派普斯(1949-)写了一部伊斯兰历史——《在真主的道路上:伊斯兰教和政治权力》(1983)——这本书和奈波利游记一样，代表了女性主义的伊斯兰恐惧症。本文认为奈保尔的游记和派普斯的历史都采用了女性主义，这导致了女性主义的伊斯兰恐惧症，这是他们文本互文动态的原因之一。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Feministic Islamophobia: Representation of Muslim Women in V.S. Naipaul’s Travelogues and Daniel Pipes’ History

Abstract When feminism is co-opted to caricature Islam and Muslim men as patriarchal and oppressive to women, it may cause Islamophobia. This interrelation between feminism and Islamophobia can be called ‘Feministic Islamophobia'. Such Islamophobia is reflected in V. S. Naipaul's travelogues – “Among the Believers: An Islamic Journey” (1981) and “Beyond Belief: Islamic Excursions among the Converted Peoples” (1998). An advocate of these travelogues Daniel Pipes (1949- ) wrote an Islamic history – In the Path of God: Islam and Political Power (1983) – that, like Naipaulian travelogues, represents feministic Islamophobia. This article argues that the co-opted feminism of both Naipaul's travelogues and Pipes’ history causes feministic Islamophobia that is one of the causes of intertextual dynamic between their texts.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs RELIGION-

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs is a peer reviewed research journal produced by the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs (IMMA) as part of its publication programme. Published since 1979, the journalhas firmly established itself as a highly respected and widely acclaimed academic and scholarly publication providing accurate, reliable and objective information. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs provides a forum for frank but responsible discussion of issues relating to the life of Muslims in non-Muslim societies. The journalhas become increasingly influential as the subject of Muslim minorities has acquired added significance. About 500 million Muslims, fully one third of the world Muslim population of 1.5 billion, live as minorities in 149 countries around the globe. Even as minorities they form significant communities within their countries of residence. What kind of life do they live? What are their social, political and economic problems? How do they perceive their strengths and weakness? What above all, is their future in Islam and in the communities of their residence? The journal explores these and similar questions from the Muslim and international point of view in a serious and responsible manner.