教育领导中的关系方法与社会认识论:再答

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in Educational Administration & Leadership Pub Date : 2019-07-09 DOI:10.30828/REAL/2019.1.7
Scott Eacott
{"title":"教育领导中的关系方法与社会认识论:再答","authors":"Scott Eacott","doi":"10.30828/REAL/2019.1.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Calls for a social epistemology in educational administration and leadership are not new. As a field of inquiry, parallel monologues have come to dominate scholarly outlets and forums. But, parallel monologues arguably violate the logic of academic work – argument and refutation – with significant implications for the rigor and robustness of knowledge claims. This Special Issue sought to provide a forum for sustained dialogue and debate on the problems and possibilities of the relational approach that I am advancing. As the concluding paper, and a rejoinder to the contributions, here I highlight the difficulties of generating dialogue and debate and how going beyond our own complicity is challenging, but arguably rewarding, academic work","PeriodicalId":41311,"journal":{"name":"Research in Educational Administration & Leadership","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relational Approach and Social Epistemology in Educational Leadership: A Rejoinder\",\"authors\":\"Scott Eacott\",\"doi\":\"10.30828/REAL/2019.1.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Calls for a social epistemology in educational administration and leadership are not new. As a field of inquiry, parallel monologues have come to dominate scholarly outlets and forums. But, parallel monologues arguably violate the logic of academic work – argument and refutation – with significant implications for the rigor and robustness of knowledge claims. This Special Issue sought to provide a forum for sustained dialogue and debate on the problems and possibilities of the relational approach that I am advancing. As the concluding paper, and a rejoinder to the contributions, here I highlight the difficulties of generating dialogue and debate and how going beyond our own complicity is challenging, but arguably rewarding, academic work\",\"PeriodicalId\":41311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Educational Administration & Leadership\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Educational Administration & Leadership\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30828/REAL/2019.1.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Educational Administration & Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30828/REAL/2019.1.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在教育管理和领导中呼唤社会认识论并不是什么新鲜事。作为一个研究领域,平行独白已经主导了学术渠道和论坛。但是,平行独白可以说违反了学术工作的逻辑——论证和反驳——对知识主张的严谨性和稳健性有着重要的影响。本期特刊旨在提供一个论坛,就我所提出的关系方法的问题和可能性进行持续对话和辩论。作为结论性论文,以及对这些贡献的回应,我在这里强调了产生对话和辩论的困难,以及如何超越我们自己的共谋是具有挑战性的,但可以说是有益的,学术工作
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Relational Approach and Social Epistemology in Educational Leadership: A Rejoinder
Calls for a social epistemology in educational administration and leadership are not new. As a field of inquiry, parallel monologues have come to dominate scholarly outlets and forums. But, parallel monologues arguably violate the logic of academic work – argument and refutation – with significant implications for the rigor and robustness of knowledge claims. This Special Issue sought to provide a forum for sustained dialogue and debate on the problems and possibilities of the relational approach that I am advancing. As the concluding paper, and a rejoinder to the contributions, here I highlight the difficulties of generating dialogue and debate and how going beyond our own complicity is challenging, but arguably rewarding, academic work
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Educational Administration & Leadership
Research in Educational Administration & Leadership EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
School Administrators’ Priorities for Legal Literacy Training Teachers’ Organizational Commitment: The Role of Demographic Characteristics and Their Psychological Empowerment in Turkey Studying negative aspects in work organizations: The benefits of qualitative methodologies Evaluation of Image Studies in the Field of Education: A Systematic Literature Review Assessing the implementation of school discipline policy in Ghanaian basic schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1