逆流而行:文化心理学与文化变革管理

IF 1 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Culture & Psychology Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.1177/1354067X21993789
E. Graamans, Wouter ten Have, S. ten Have
{"title":"逆流而行:文化心理学与文化变革管理","authors":"E. Graamans, Wouter ten Have, S. ten Have","doi":"10.1177/1354067X21993789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the 1980s, psychologists and management scholars have contributed significantly to the popularity of the idea of culture in organizations. A common and tenacious pitfall surrounding this idea, at times pointed out by these scholars themselves, is that culture is too often hypostatized and superimposed upon people. In doing so, this can have harmful consequences for employees at every level of organization. In this article, we reiterate this critique, challenge familiar managerial notions used to address “shared” behavior among employees, and answer to an old but neglected call to bring back real people to the forefront of our analyses. Based upon our adaptation of the enactive approach to the social tuning of behavior developed by Paul Voestermans and Theo Verheggen—made applicable in empirical studies on culture change conducted by the first author of this article—and inspired by principles of Gestalt, we propose a novel heuristic model to address organizational culture change. We attempt to do so both from an analytical and interventionist standpoint, while avoiding attributing causality to the idea of culture.","PeriodicalId":47241,"journal":{"name":"Culture & Psychology","volume":"27 1","pages":"325 - 343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1354067X21993789","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Against the current: Cultural psychology and culture change management\",\"authors\":\"E. Graamans, Wouter ten Have, S. ten Have\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1354067X21993789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since the 1980s, psychologists and management scholars have contributed significantly to the popularity of the idea of culture in organizations. A common and tenacious pitfall surrounding this idea, at times pointed out by these scholars themselves, is that culture is too often hypostatized and superimposed upon people. In doing so, this can have harmful consequences for employees at every level of organization. In this article, we reiterate this critique, challenge familiar managerial notions used to address “shared” behavior among employees, and answer to an old but neglected call to bring back real people to the forefront of our analyses. Based upon our adaptation of the enactive approach to the social tuning of behavior developed by Paul Voestermans and Theo Verheggen—made applicable in empirical studies on culture change conducted by the first author of this article—and inspired by principles of Gestalt, we propose a novel heuristic model to address organizational culture change. We attempt to do so both from an analytical and interventionist standpoint, while avoiding attributing causality to the idea of culture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Culture & Psychology\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"325 - 343\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1354067X21993789\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Culture & Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X21993789\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture & Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X21993789","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

自20世纪80年代以来,心理学家和管理学者对文化理念在组织中的流行做出了重大贡献。这些学者自己有时也指出,围绕这一观点的一个常见而顽固的陷阱是,文化往往被实体化并叠加在人身上。这样做可能会对组织各个层面的员工造成有害后果。在这篇文章中,我们重申了这一批评,挑战了人们熟悉的用于解决员工之间“共享”行为的管理理念,并回应了一个古老但被忽视的呼吁,即让真实的人回到我们分析的前沿。基于我们对Paul Voestermans和Theo Verheggen提出的行为社会调节的制定方法的改编——适用于本文第一作者对文化变化的实证研究——并受到格式塔原理的启发,我们提出了一个新的启发式模型来解决组织文化变化问题。我们试图从分析和干预的角度来做到这一点,同时避免将因果关系归因于文化理念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Against the current: Cultural psychology and culture change management
Since the 1980s, psychologists and management scholars have contributed significantly to the popularity of the idea of culture in organizations. A common and tenacious pitfall surrounding this idea, at times pointed out by these scholars themselves, is that culture is too often hypostatized and superimposed upon people. In doing so, this can have harmful consequences for employees at every level of organization. In this article, we reiterate this critique, challenge familiar managerial notions used to address “shared” behavior among employees, and answer to an old but neglected call to bring back real people to the forefront of our analyses. Based upon our adaptation of the enactive approach to the social tuning of behavior developed by Paul Voestermans and Theo Verheggen—made applicable in empirical studies on culture change conducted by the first author of this article—and inspired by principles of Gestalt, we propose a novel heuristic model to address organizational culture change. We attempt to do so both from an analytical and interventionist standpoint, while avoiding attributing causality to the idea of culture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Culture & Psychology
Culture & Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
18.80%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Culture & Psychology addresses the centrality of culture necessary for a basic understanding of the psychology of human beings: their identity, social conduct, intra- and intersubjective experiences, emotions and semiotic creativity. By drawing on diverse theoretical backgrounds, the editorial aim is to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for scholarly investigations and discussions that will advance our basic knowledge of the self in its historical and cultural contexts. The orientation of the journal is towards formulating new conceptualizations of culture in psychology, together with theoretically relevant empirical investigations.
期刊最新文献
Moving up the stream beyond resistance to counter move The homeless mind in a mobile world: An autoethnographic approach on cognitive immobility in international migration Cultural and idiographic approach to the microgenesis of visual metaphors Exploring experiences of proculturation in international students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Identity and parent-child relationship representations of Nezha: From cultural narrative to case conceptualization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1