气候变化对土地保护的挑战:重新思考保护地役权、策略和工具

W. Weeks, Jessica Owley, Federico Cheever, A. Rissman, Rebecca Shaw, W. Weeks, M. R. Shaw, Barton H. Thompson, Jessica Owley, Federico Cheever, A. Rissman, M. R. Shaw, Barton H. Thompson
{"title":"气候变化对土地保护的挑战:重新思考保护地役权、策略和工具","authors":"W. Weeks, Jessica Owley, Federico Cheever, A. Rissman, Rebecca Shaw, W. Weeks, M. R. Shaw, Barton H. Thompson, Jessica Owley, Federico Cheever, A. Rissman, M. R. Shaw, Barton H. Thompson","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3218525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Climate change has significant consequences for land conservation. Government agencies and nonprofit land trusts heavily rely on perpetual conservation easements. However, climate change and other dynamic landscape changes raise questions about the effectiveness and adaptability of permanent conservation instruments like conservation easements. Building upon a study of 269 conservation easements and interviews with seventy conservation-easement professionals in six different states, we examine the adaptability of conservation easements to climate change. We outline four potential approaches to enhance conservation outcomes under climate change: (1) shift land-acquisition priorities to account for potential climate-change impacts; (2) consider conservation tools other than perpetual conservation easements; (3) ensure that the terms of conservation easements permit the holder to adapt to climate change successfully; and (4) provide for more active stewardship of conservation lands. There is still a good deal of uncertainty as to the legal fate of a conservation easement that no longer meets its original purposes. Many state laws provide that conservation easements can be modified or terminated in the same manner as traditional easements. Yet, conservation easements are in many ways unlike other easements. The beneficiary is usually the public, not merely a neighboring landowner, and the holder is always a non-profit conservation organization or a government agency. Thus, there is a case to be made for adaptive protection. An overly narrow focus on perpetual property rights could actually thwart efforts to meet adaptation needs over the long term. We call for careful attention to ensuring conservation outcomes in dynamic landscapes over time.","PeriodicalId":81088,"journal":{"name":"Denver University law review","volume":"95 1","pages":"727-779"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Climate Change Challenges for Land Conservation: Rethinking Conservation Easements, Strategies, and Tools\",\"authors\":\"W. Weeks, Jessica Owley, Federico Cheever, A. Rissman, Rebecca Shaw, W. Weeks, M. R. Shaw, Barton H. Thompson, Jessica Owley, Federico Cheever, A. Rissman, M. R. Shaw, Barton H. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3218525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Climate change has significant consequences for land conservation. Government agencies and nonprofit land trusts heavily rely on perpetual conservation easements. However, climate change and other dynamic landscape changes raise questions about the effectiveness and adaptability of permanent conservation instruments like conservation easements. Building upon a study of 269 conservation easements and interviews with seventy conservation-easement professionals in six different states, we examine the adaptability of conservation easements to climate change. We outline four potential approaches to enhance conservation outcomes under climate change: (1) shift land-acquisition priorities to account for potential climate-change impacts; (2) consider conservation tools other than perpetual conservation easements; (3) ensure that the terms of conservation easements permit the holder to adapt to climate change successfully; and (4) provide for more active stewardship of conservation lands. There is still a good deal of uncertainty as to the legal fate of a conservation easement that no longer meets its original purposes. Many state laws provide that conservation easements can be modified or terminated in the same manner as traditional easements. Yet, conservation easements are in many ways unlike other easements. The beneficiary is usually the public, not merely a neighboring landowner, and the holder is always a non-profit conservation organization or a government agency. Thus, there is a case to be made for adaptive protection. An overly narrow focus on perpetual property rights could actually thwart efforts to meet adaptation needs over the long term. We call for careful attention to ensuring conservation outcomes in dynamic landscapes over time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Denver University law review\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"727-779\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Denver University law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3218525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Denver University law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3218525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

气候变化对土地保护有重大影响。政府机构和非营利性土地信托严重依赖永久保护地役权。然而,气候变化和其他动态景观变化对永久性保护手段(如保护地役权)的有效性和适应性提出了质疑。基于对269个地役权保护区的研究和对来自6个不同州的70位地役权保护区专业人士的访谈,我们考察了地役权保护区对气候变化的适应性。我们概述了在气候变化下提高保护成果的四种潜在方法:(1)改变土地征用的优先顺序,以考虑潜在的气候变化影响;(2)考虑永久保护地役权以外的保护工具;(3)确保保护地役权条款允许持有人成功适应气候变化;(4)提供更积极的保护用地管理。保护地役权的法律命运仍然存在很大的不确定性,因为它不再符合其最初的目的。许多州的法律规定,保护地役权可以像传统地役权一样被修改或终止。然而,保护地役权在许多方面不同于其他地役权。受益人通常是公众,而不仅仅是邻近的土地所有者,而所有者通常是非营利保护组织或政府机构。因此,有理由提出适应性保护。对永久产权过于狭隘的关注实际上可能会阻碍满足长期适应需求的努力。我们呼吁认真关注动态景观的保护成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Climate Change Challenges for Land Conservation: Rethinking Conservation Easements, Strategies, and Tools
Climate change has significant consequences for land conservation. Government agencies and nonprofit land trusts heavily rely on perpetual conservation easements. However, climate change and other dynamic landscape changes raise questions about the effectiveness and adaptability of permanent conservation instruments like conservation easements. Building upon a study of 269 conservation easements and interviews with seventy conservation-easement professionals in six different states, we examine the adaptability of conservation easements to climate change. We outline four potential approaches to enhance conservation outcomes under climate change: (1) shift land-acquisition priorities to account for potential climate-change impacts; (2) consider conservation tools other than perpetual conservation easements; (3) ensure that the terms of conservation easements permit the holder to adapt to climate change successfully; and (4) provide for more active stewardship of conservation lands. There is still a good deal of uncertainty as to the legal fate of a conservation easement that no longer meets its original purposes. Many state laws provide that conservation easements can be modified or terminated in the same manner as traditional easements. Yet, conservation easements are in many ways unlike other easements. The beneficiary is usually the public, not merely a neighboring landowner, and the holder is always a non-profit conservation organization or a government agency. Thus, there is a case to be made for adaptive protection. An overly narrow focus on perpetual property rights could actually thwart efforts to meet adaptation needs over the long term. We call for careful attention to ensuring conservation outcomes in dynamic landscapes over time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Climate Change Challenges for Land Conservation: Rethinking Conservation Easements, Strategies, and Tools In Search of a Forum for the Families of the Guantanamo Disappeared Democracy, Violence, and Constitutional Revision in the Shadow of Democratic Revolution Theory Closing the Courthouse Doors Corporations and Autonomy Theories of Contract: A Critique of the New Lex Mercatoria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1